Variation of rectal temperature in dogs undergoing 3T-MRI in general anesthesia.

body temperature diagnostic imaging dog hyperthermia hypothermia

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 01 02 2023
accepted: 06 06 2023
medline: 10 8 2023
pubmed: 10 8 2023
entrez: 10 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Managing body temperature during MRI scanning under general anesthesia poses challenges for both human and veterinary patients, as many temperature monitoring devices and patient warming systems are unsuitable for the use inside an MRI scanner. MRI has the potential to cause tissue and body warming, but this effect may be counteracted by the hypothermia induced by general anesthesia and the low ambient temperature usually encountered in scanner rooms. This study aimed to observe temperature variations in dogs undergoing MRI under general anesthesia. In this prospective observational study, client-owned dogs scheduled for 3-Tesla MRI under anesthesia between February and October 2020 at a veterinary teaching hospital were eligible for enrollment. Recorded data included breed, body mass, body condition score, age, fur quality, pre- and post-MRI rectal temperatures, time in the MRI room, scan area and coil used, application of contrast medium, choice of anesthetic agents, use of blankets, and infusion therapy. Group comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis test, with In total 171 dogs met the inclusion criteria. The median body temperature at admission was 38.4°C (IQR 38.1-38.7°C). The median body temperature before MRI was 38.2°C (IQR 37.8-38.6°C), and the median temperature after the MRI scan was 37.7°C (IQR 37.238.2°C) resulting in a median temperature difference (∆T) before and after MRI of - 0.6°C (IQR -0.8--0.1°C). The median duration of MRI scans was 49 min (IQR 38-63 min). A temperature loss of more than 0.1°C was observed in 121 (70.8%) dogs, 29 (16.9%) dogs maintained their temperature within 0.1°C, and 21 (12.3%) dogs experienced a temperature increase of more than 0.1°C. Factors associated with a higher post-MRI temperature included greater body mass, medium or long fur, and the application of α Dogs undergoing MRI under general anesthesia are likely to experience temperature loss in the given circumstances. However, in larger dogs and those with much fur, an increase in body temperature is possible and more common than generally anticipated, although clinically insignificant in most cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37559890
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1156773
pmc: PMC10409483
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1156773

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Paul and Alef.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):385-9
pubmed: 19174372
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jun;102(6):1674-9
pubmed: 16717307
Cureus. 2019 Sep 20;11(9):e5705
pubmed: 31720173
Anesth Analg. 1993 Jul;77(1):73-7
pubmed: 8317751
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 May 23;4(4):e181
pubmed: 31572883
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;258(1):64-71
pubmed: 33314972
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011 Mar-Apr;52(1 Suppl 1):S2-4
pubmed: 21392152
Am J Vet Res. 2016 Apr;77(4):351-7
pubmed: 27027833
Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Jan;20(1):65-76
pubmed: 11973031
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Apr;33(4):950-6
pubmed: 21448962
Lancet. 2016 Jun 25;387(10038):2655-2664
pubmed: 26775126
Ir Vet J. 2018 Dec 17;71:26
pubmed: 30568789
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Nov;26(5):1334-9
pubmed: 17969173
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 12;11(8):
pubmed: 34438834
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016 Sep;43(5):502-10
pubmed: 26782994
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2015 May-Jun;25(3):372-8
pubmed: 25854787
Can Vet J. 2003 Nov;44(11):885-97
pubmed: 14664351
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 May;42(3):333-9
pubmed: 24794473
Aust Vet J. 2007 Apr;85(4):158-62
pubmed: 17397389
Vet Rec. 2013 Nov 30;173(21):524
pubmed: 24158324
Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1416-20, table of contents
pubmed: 12031998
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 May;44(3):452-460
pubmed: 28549943
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2013 May;40(3):280-4
pubmed: 23347363
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):200-205
pubmed: 32317875
Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):978-84
pubmed: 11004060
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):223
pubmed: 32883204
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Nov 18;12:1717-1720
pubmed: 27920541
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20160027
pubmed: 27194459
Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Jul;32(7):870-879
pubmed: 35366370
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Aug;25(4):163-9
pubmed: 27367314
Vet Rec. 2012 Oct 13;171(15):374
pubmed: 22922707
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Jun 15;230(12):1841-8
pubmed: 17571987
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2019 Nov;46(6):720-728
pubmed: 31547961
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011 Mar-Apr;52(1 Suppl 1):S5-S14
pubmed: 21392156

Auteurs

Frauke Paul (F)

Department for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Michaele Alef (M)

Department for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Classifications MeSH