Comparative elucidation on the phenolic fingerprint, sugars and antioxidant activity of white, orange and purple-fleshed sweet potatoes (

Anthocyanins Antioxidant capacity Ipomoea batatas L. Phenolics Sweet potato

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 05 04 2023
revised: 07 07 2023
accepted: 25 07 2023
medline: 10 8 2023
pubmed: 10 8 2023
entrez: 10 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this study, three cooking methods (baking, boiling, sous vide (SV)) were applied to Turkish sweet potatoes with three flesh colors (white, orange, purple) to examine the effects of the product color and cooking methods on the total phenolics, antioxidant activity, sugars, phenolic acids, and anthocyanins. LC-MS-MS was employed in the characterization of these compounds. It was observed that the product color and cooking method significantly affected the concentrations of bioactive compounds like polyphenols. Both the highest total phenolic content (11.36 mg/g) and antioxidant activity (DPPH (50.3 μM TE/g) and ABTS (63.53 μM TE/g)) were determined in the purple sweet potato cooked with the SV method. 10 phenolic acids were quantified in all samples which were in the highest amounts in the orange colored samples followed by the purple samples. Baking resulted in the highest total phenolic acids in all samples. 13 anthocyanins were detected in the purple-colored samples, while the SV cooking best preserved the anthocyanins. In sum, purple sweet potatoes cooked by SV are recommended for higher phenolic contents, antioxidant capacity and anthocyanins.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37560669
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18684
pii: S2405-8440(23)05892-9
pmc: PMC10407218
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e18684

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Molecules. 2019 Oct 23;24(21):
pubmed: 31652733
Food Chem. 2019 Feb 15;274:460-470
pubmed: 30372966
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jan 15;99(1):173-182
pubmed: 29851088
Food Chem. 2020 Feb 1;305:125505
pubmed: 31606693
J Food Sci Technol. 2014 Dec;51(12):4072-7
pubmed: 25477683
J Food Sci. 2007 Sep;72(7):C412-6
pubmed: 17995640
J Mass Spectrom. 2018 Jan;53(1):58-64
pubmed: 28960779
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005 May;69(5):979-88
pubmed: 15914919
J Mass Spectrom. 2018 May;53(5):444-454
pubmed: 29469168
Food Chem. 2021 Jun 30;348:129088
pubmed: 33515948
Food Res Int. 2016 Nov;89(Pt 1):90-116
pubmed: 28460992
Molecules. 2022 Mar 14;27(6):
pubmed: 35335244
J Nutr. 2001 Jan;131(1):66-71
pubmed: 11208940

Auteurs

Gamze Guclu (G)

Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cukurova University, 01330, Adana, Türkiye.

Mumine Melike Dagli (MM)

Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cukurova University, 01330, Adana, Türkiye.
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, 01250, Adana, Türkiye.

Muharrem Keskin (M)

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31040, Antakya, Hatay, Türkiye.

Hasim Kelebek (H)

Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, 01250, Adana, Türkiye.

Serkan Selli (S)

Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cukurova University, 01330, Adana, Türkiye.

Classifications MeSH