Changing the paradigm for pesticide resistance management.
pesticide resistance
resistance management
stakeholder engagement
wicked problem
Journal
Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
25
07
2023
received:
14
02
2023
accepted:
10
08
2023
pubmed:
10
8
2023
medline:
10
8
2023
entrez:
10
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Collaborative action on the part of all stakeholders in pest management is essential to effectively address the challenges of pesticide resistance. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through its Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee, recently posted a report on pesticide resistance management and the role the Agency can play in these efforts. In this Perspective, we commend the Agency for acknowledging these needs, and encourage implementation of the recommendations. We urge all stakeholders to follow the example set by the EPA to engage openly, listen to other stakeholders, and determine their role as part of the broader community that is needed to address the challenges of resistance. Our contention is that pesticide resistance will continue to escalate until all stakeholders evaluate their roles in resistance management and work together as a community to influence effective management. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4726-4730Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Rittel H and Webber M, Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 5:155-169 (1973).
Ervin DE and Jussaume RA Jr, Herbicide resistance: integrating social science into understanding and managing weed resistance and associated environmental impacts. Weed Sci 62:403-414 (2014).
Shaw DR, The “wicked” nature of the herbicide resistance problem. Weed Sci 64:552-558 (2016).
Jussaume RA Jr and Ervin DE, Understanding weed resistance as a wicked problem to improve weed management decisions. Weed Sci 64:559-569 (2016).
Ervin DE and Frisvold GB, Community-based approaches to herbicide-resistant weed management: lessons from science and practice. Weed Sci 64:609-626 (2016).
Gould F, Brown ZS and Kuzma J, Wicked evolution: can we address the sociobiological dilemma of pesticide resistance? Science 360:728-732 (2018).
Heap I, International Herbicide Resistant-Weed Database https://www.weedscience.org/Pages/ChronologicalIncrease.aspx. Accessed June 1, 2023.
McCauley C, Legleiter T, Herman R, Rasoulpour R, Schroeder J, Pilcher T et al., Sustainable weed management - what is it and how are we doing? Weed Technol 36:768-776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2022.103.
Dentzman K, Gunderson R and Jussaume R, Techno-optimism as a barrier to overcoming herbicide resistance: comparing farmer perceptions of the future potential of herbicides. J Rural Stud 48:22-32 (2016).
Shaw D, Ervin D, Frisvold G, Jussaume R and Sword G, Stewardship Challenges for New Pest Management Technologies in Agriculture. Commentary. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST), Ames, Iowa (2020).
Haney PB, Lewis WJ and Lambert WR, Cotton Production and the Boll Weevil in Georgia: History, Cost of Control, and Benefits of Eradication. Georgia Agriculture Experiment Stations Research Bulletin No. 428. University of Georgia, Athens, GA (2009).
Walters ML, Sequeira R, Staten R, El-Lissy O, Moses-Gonzales N, Radcliffe E et al., Eradication: strategies and tactics, in Integrated Pest Management, ed. by Radcliffe EB, Hutchison WD and Cancelado RE. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 298-308 (2009).
Schroeder J, Barrett M, Shaw DR, Asmus AB, Coble H, Ervin D et al., Managing herbicide resistance: listening to the perspectives of practitioners. Procedures for conducting listening sessions and an evaluation of the process. Weed Technol 32:489-497 (2018).
Coble HD and Schroeder J, A call to action on herbicide resistance. Weed Sci 64:661-666 (2016).
Ostrom E, A general framework for analyzing the sustainability of socio-ecological systems. Science 325:419-422 (2009).
Ostrom E, Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:641-672 (2010).
Ostrom E, Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J 39:7-27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x.
Ervin D, Breshears E, Frisvold G, Hurley T, Dentzman K, Gunsolus J et al., Farmer attitudes toward cooperative approaches to herbicide resistance management: a common pool ecosystem service challenge. Ecol Econ 157:237-245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.023.
Dentzman K, Pilcher C, Bagavathiannan M, Barrett M and Burke I, Lessons in building community capacity for managing agricultural pests: a science policy experience in Iowa. Outlooks Pest Manag 31:249-256 (2020).
Shaw D ed, Report from the Resistance Management Work Group Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee, A. Reynolds, D. Shaw, B. Chism, co-chairs Available: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-10/resistance-management-workgroup-report-and-recommendations-for-ppdc-review.pdf (2021).
(EPA) Environmental Protection Agency, Available: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/slowing-and-combating-pest-resistance-pesticides, [12 February 2023].
(EPA) Environmental Protection Agency, Available: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/prn-2017-1-guidance-pesticide-registrants-pesticide-resistance-management, [12 February 2023].
(EPA) Environmental Protection Agency, Available: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/prn-2017-2-guidance-herbicide-resistance-management-labeling-education, [12 February 2023].
Norsworthy J, Ward S, Shaw D, Llewellyn R, Nichols R, Webster T et al., Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:31-62 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00155.1.
(EPA) Environmental Protection Agency, Summary of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 5 U.S.C. 10 Available: https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-federal-advisory-committee-act. [05 December 2023].
(EPA) Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Available: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-advisory-committees-and-regulatory-partners/pesticide-program-dialogue-committee-ppdc#about, Accessed [4 June 2023].
Ansell C and Gash A, Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory 18:543-571 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.