Test-retest reliability and sensitivity of senior elite amateur boxers maximal punch force, as quantified by a vertically mounted force plate.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
21
11
2022
accepted:
26
07
2023
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
10
8
2023
entrez:
10
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An ecologically valid, reliable and sensitive method of quantifying punch force variables would be useful for coaches and practitioners monitoring combat-specific performance. The present study utilised a vertically mounted force plate to quantify the peak punch force and rate of force development (RFD) of amateur boxers. Ten male senior elite amateur boxers performed maximal jab, cross, and hook punches across two separate days. The force plate showed excellent within-day and good-to-excellent between-day reliability for peak punch impact force and RFD (ICC 0.89-0.99). The CV% for all punch force variables were similar on day 1 (3-9%) and day 2 (4-10%). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest worthwhile changes (SWC) revealed the force plate can detect small-to-moderate changes in punch performance. The greatest impact forces and RFD were found in the rear hook (2624 ± 581 N, 296448 ± 101823 N.s-1), followed by the lead hook (2524 ± 532 N, 256813 ± 81735 N.s-1), cross 2425 ± 545 N, 193004 ± 62671 N.s-1) and jab (1645 ± 537 N, 116675 ± 41577 N.s-1). The vertically mounted force plate is a reliable and sensitive test of punch performance, thus may be useful in determining the efficacy of training interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37561692
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289791
pii: PONE-D-22-27622
pmc: PMC10414587
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0289791Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Finlay et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 01;10:1359
pubmed: 31736781
Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):1-15
pubmed: 10907753
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Apr;34(4):1052-1061
pubmed: 30358696
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):1005-1012
pubmed: 29570596
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Jan;10(1):53-7
pubmed: 24912199
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jan;30(1):109-16
pubmed: 26110348
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Apr;34(4):1040-1051
pubmed: 30789570
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(5):516-28
pubmed: 23121380
J Sports Sci. 2000 Jun;18(6):445-50
pubmed: 10902679
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Dec;32(12):3441-3446
pubmed: 30480653
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40
pubmed: 15705040
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;39(10):710-9
pubmed: 16183766
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2016;18(1):47-54
pubmed: 27149957
Sports Med. 1998 Oct;26(4):217-38
pubmed: 9820922
J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Jul 01;5(CSSI):74-89
pubmed: 24357979
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 21;9(4):e95773
pubmed: 24752193
Psychol Res. 2017 Sep;81(5):1051-1058
pubmed: 27465395
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jul;32(7):1838-1842
pubmed: 29420389
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Nov 26;2:598861
pubmed: 33345181
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2001 Jun;11(2):238-47
pubmed: 11426438
Sports Biomech. 2011 Mar;10(1):1-11
pubmed: 21560747
Sports Med. 2008;38(4):297-316
pubmed: 18348590
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Apr 1;35(4):e3-e288
pubmed: 33752224
Br J Sports Med. 2000 Apr;34(2):109-14; discussion 115
pubmed: 10786866