18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography provides pertinent additional information to computed tomography for assessment and management of tarsal pain in horses.


Journal

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
ISSN: 1943-569X
Titre abrégé: J Am Vet Med Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503067

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 15 04 2023
accepted: 11 07 2023
pubmed: 11 8 2023
medline: 11 8 2023
entrez: 10 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess the value of 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) for imaging the tarsus and proximal metatarsus and compare it with CT and lameness evaluation. 25 horses with lameness localized to the tarsal and proximal metatarsal regions that underwent 18F-NaF PET/CT between 2016 and 2021. 18F-NaF PET and CT images were retrospectively independently evaluated by 3 observers. Standardized uptake values (SUV) were used to characterize 18F-NaF uptake. Correlation between PET and CT findings with subjective and objective maximum (Max-D) and minimum pelvic height lameness data was estimated. The inter-observer Kappa-weighted value (κ) was higher for PET (κ = 0.66) than CT (κ = 0.6). CT and PET scores were fairly correlated (R = 0.49; P < 0.05). PET SUVratio (SUV of the main lesion/SUV talus) had the highest correlation with Max-D (R = 0.71; P < .05). PET and CT scores for the plantar region were significantly higher in Quarter Horses (P < .05) and showed consistently higher correlation with objective lameness data (CT plantar grade - Max-D [R = 0.6; P < .05], PET plantar grade - Max-D [R = 0.47; P = .04]) than other regions of the distal tarsal joints. Three Warmbloods presented marked uptake at the medial cochlea of the distal tibia. PET had a moderate correlation with CT for assessment of tarsal lesions. The degree of PET uptake can help differentiate active versus inactive lesions. Specific location of the uptake is important in determining clinical relevance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37562781
doi: 10.2460/javma.23.03.0164
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1638-1645

Auteurs

Pablo Espinosa-Mur (P)

1Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Mathieu Spriet (M)

2School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.

Gabriel Manso-Diaz (G)

3Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Stefanie Arndt (S)

4Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University.

Marcos Perez-Nogues (M)

2School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.

Javier Lopez-San Roman (JL)

3Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Ricardo Garcia-Mata (R)

3Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Scott A Katzman (SA)

2School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.

Larry D Galuppo (LD)

2School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.

Classifications MeSH