A randomised study of nurse collected venous blood and self-collected dried blood spots for the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors in the Understanding Society Innovation Panel.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 08 2023
10 08 2023
Historique:
received:
16
02
2023
accepted:
28
07
2023
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
11
8
2023
entrez:
10
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dried blood spot (DBS) sample collection has been suggested as a less invasive, cheaper and more convenient alternative to venepuncture, which requires trained personnel, making it a potentially viable approach for self-collection of blood on a large scale. We examine whether participants in a longitudinal survey were willing to provide a DBS sample in different interview settings, and how resulting cardiovascular risk biomarkers compared with those from venous blood to calculate clinical risk. Participants of the Understanding Society Innovation Panel, a representative sample of UK households, were randomly assigned to three modes of interview. Most participants (84%) were interviewed in their allocated mode. Participants (n = 2162) were interviewed by a nurse who collected both a blood sample by venepuncture and a DBS card ('nurse collection') or participants were seen by an interviewer or took part in the survey online to self-collect a DBS card ('self-collection'). All DBS cards were returned in the post after the sample had dried. Lipids (total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides), HbA1c and C-reactive protein were measured in venous and DBS samples and equivalence was calculated. The resultant values were used to confirm equivalent prevalence of risk of cardiovascular disease in each type of blood sample by mode of participation. Of participants interviewed by a nurse 69% consented to venous blood sample and 74% to a DBS sample, while in the self-collection modes, 35% consented to DBS collection. Demographic characteristics of participants in self-collection mode was not different to those in nurse collection mode. The percentage of participants with clinically raised biomarkers did not significantly differ between type of blood collection (for example, 62% had high cholesterol (> 5 mmol/l) measured by venepuncture and 67% had high cholesterol within the self-collected DBS sample (p = 0.13)). While self-collected DBS sampling had a lower response rate to DBS collected by a nurse, participation did not vary by key demographic characteristics. This study demonstrates that DBS collection is a feasible method of sample collection that can provide acceptable measures of clinically relevant biomarkers, enabling the calculation of population levels of cardiovascular disease risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37563249
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39674-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-39674-6
pmc: PMC10415328
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Cholesterol, HDL
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13008Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Pollitt, R. A., Rose, K. M. & Kaufman, J. S. Evaluating the evidence for models of life course socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 5(1), 7 (2005).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-7
pubmed: 15661071
pmcid: 548689
Stringhini, S. et al. Socio-economic trajectories and cardiovascular disease mortality in older people: The English longitudinal study of ageing. Int. J. Epidemiol. 47(1), 36–46 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx106
pubmed: 29040623
Marmot, M. & Brunner, E. Cohort profile: The whitehall II study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 34(2), 251–256 (2005).
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh372
pubmed: 15576467
Elliott, P., Peakman, T. C. & Biobank, U. K. The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. Int. J. Epidemiol. 37(2), 234–44 (2008).
doi: 10.1093/ije/dym276
pubmed: 18381398
Fraser, A. et al. Cohort profile: The Avon longitudinal study of parents and children: ALSPAC mothers cohort. Int. J. Epidemiol. 42(1), 97–110 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/ije/dys066
pubmed: 22507742
Mills, E. et al. Barriers to participation in HIV drug trials: A systematic review. Lancet. Infect. Dis 6(1), 32–38 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70324-8
pubmed: 16377532
Rockett, J. C., Buck, G. M., Lynch, C. D. & Perreault, S. D. The value of home-based collection of biospecimens in reproductive epidemiology. Environ. Health Perspect. 112(1), 94–104 (2004).
doi: 10.1289/ehp.6264
pubmed: 14698937
pmcid: 1241803
Williams, S. R. & McDade, T. W. The use of dried blood spot sampling in the national social life, health, and aging project. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 64(SUPPL.1), i131-6 (2009).
Guyer, H., Ofstedal, M. B., Lessof, C., & Cox, K. The benefits and challenges of collecting physical measures and biomarkers in cross- national studies in March 2022: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/Collecting%20PM-Bio%20Data_DocumentationReport.pdf .
Egier, D. A., Keys, J. L., Hall, S. K. & McQueen, M. J. Measurement of hemoglobin A1c from filter papers for population-based studies. Clin. Chem. 57(4), 577–585 (2011).
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.156380
pubmed: 21296974
Affan, E. T., Praveen, D., Chow, C. K. & Neal, B. C. Comparability of HbA1c and lipids measured with dried blood spot versus venous samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Clin. Path. 14, 21 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-14-21
Crimmins, E. M. et al. Dried blood spots: Effects of less than optimal collection, shipping time, heat, and humidity. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 32(5), e23390 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23390
pubmed: 31922324
pmcid: 7347424
Hall, J. M. et al. HbA1c determination from HemaSpot™ blood collection devices: Comparison of home prepared dried blood spots with standard venous blood analysis. Diabet. Med. 37(9), 1463–1470 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/dme.14110
pubmed: 31418916
McDade, T. W., Burhop, J. & Dohnal, J. High-sensitivity enzyme immunoassay for C-reactive protein in dried blood spots. Clin. Chem. 50(3), 652–654 (2004).
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029488
pubmed: 14981035
Platt, L., Knies, G., Luthra, R. R., Nandi, A. & Benzeval, M. Understanding society at 10 years | European sociological review | Oxford academic. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 36(3), 976–988 (2020).
Al Baghal, T., et al. Collection of biomarkers using nurses, interviewers, and participants: the design of IP12|Understanding Society University of Essex; 2021 in 2021 Oct 14: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/546970
McFall, S. L., Conolly, A. & Burton, J. Collecting biomarkers using trained interviewers. Lessons learned from a pilot study. Surv. Res. Methods 8(1), 57–66 (2014).
WhatmanSimpleSpotCheck.pdf in 2021 Oct 14: https://ldh.la.gov/assets/oph/Center-PHCH/Center-PH/genetic/NBSManual/WhatmanSimpleSpotCheck.pdf
mcr.pdf in 2021 Oct 14: https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2014-11-05/web/packages/mcr/mcr.pdf
Deming, W. E. Statistical Adjustment of Data (Wiley, 1943).
Cornbleet, P. J. & Gochman, N. Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis. Clin. Chem. 25(3), 432–438 (1979).
doi: 10.1093/clinchem/25.3.432
pubmed: 262186
Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8(2), 135–160 (1999).
doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204
pubmed: 10501650
University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research. Understanding Society: Innovation Panel, Waves 1-12, 2008-2019. [data collection]. 10th Edition. 2021. UK Data Service. SN: 6849. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6849-13 .
Jaszczak, A., Lundeen, K. & Smith, S. Using nonmedically trained interviewers to collect biomeasures in a national in-home survey. Field Methods 21(1), 26–48 (2009).
doi: 10.1177/1525822X08323988
pubmed: 21796261
pmcid: 3143069
Sakshaug, J. W., Couper, M. P. & Ofstedal, M. B. Characteristics of physical measurement consent in a population-based survey of older adults. Med. Care 48(1), 64–71 (2010).
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181adcbd3
pubmed: 20050351
pmcid: 4075032
Korbmacher, J. M. Interviewer effects on respondents’ willingness to provide blood samples in SHARE. SHARE working paper series 20. Available online: WP_Series_20_2014_Korbmacher.pdf (share-project.org).
Kaplan, B. A. Health and Lifestyles. By Mildred Blaxter Pp. 268 (Tavistock, Routledge, London, 1990) Paperback. J. Biosoc. Sci. 24(1), 139–139 (1990).
doi: 10.1017/S0021932000006908
Cernat, A., Sakshaug, J. W., Chandola, T., Nazroo, J. & Shlomo, N. Nurse effects on non-response in survey-based biomeasures. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 24(4), 487–499 (2021).
doi: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1832737
Mindell, J. S. et al. Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe—experience from seven national surveys. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 15(1), 78 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0072-4
pmcid: 4595185
Pashazadeh, F., Cernat, A., & Sakshaug, J. W. Chapter 16: Investigating the use of nurse paradata in understanding nonresponse to biological data collection. Appendix 16. In: Interviewer effects from a total survey error perspective.
Crimmins, E. et al. Validation of blood-based assays using dried blood spots for use in large population studies. Biodemogr. Soc. Biol. 2(60), 38–48 (2014).
doi: 10.1080/19485565.2014.901885
Lacher, D. A., et al. Comparison of dried blood spot to venous methods for hemoglobin A1c, glucose, total cholesterol, high-density - Biospecimen Research Database in Oct 14 2021: https://brd.nci.nih.gov/brd/paper/clin-chim-acta/2013/comparison-of-dried-blood-spot-to-venous-methods-for-hemoglobin/12089
Miller, I. M. et al. Collection and laboratory methods for dried blood spots for hemoglobin A1c and total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in population-based surveys. Clin. Chim. Acta 20(445), 143–154 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.03.028
Fallaize, R. et al. Association between diet-quality scores, adiposity, total cholesterol and markers of nutritional status in European adults: Findings from the Food4Me study. Nutrients 10(1), E49 (2018).
doi: 10.3390/nu10010049
Li, W., Zhang, J. & Tse, F. L. S. Handbook of LC-MS Bioanalysis: Best Practices, Experimental Protocols, and Regulations (Wiley, 2013).
doi: 10.1002/9781118671276
Buxton, O. M., Malarick, K., Wang, W. & Seeman, T. Changes in dried blood spot HbA1c with varied post-collection conditions. Clin. Chem. 55(5), 1034–1036 (2009).
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.111641
pubmed: 19299546
pmcid: 2925185
Buxton, O. M., Malarick, K., Wang, W. & Seeman, T. Changes in dried blood spot Hb A1c with varied postcollection conditions. Clin. Chem. 55(5), 1034–1036 (2009).
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.111641
pubmed: 19299546
pmcid: 2925185
Jaklevic, M. C. Pandemic spotlights in-home colon cancer screening tests. JAMA 325(2), 116–118 (2021).
Bhatti, P. et al. Blood spots as an alternative to whole blood collection and the effect of a small monetary incentive to increase participation in genetic association studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 9(1), 76 (2009).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-76
pubmed: 19912630
pmcid: 2781815