No evidence that Chinese playtime mandates reduced heavy gaming in one segment of the video games industry.
Journal
Nature human behaviour
ISSN: 2397-3374
Titre abrégé: Nat Hum Behav
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
25
11
2022
accepted:
27
06
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
11
8
2023
entrez:
10
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Governments around the world are considering regulatory measures to reduce young people's time spent on digital devices, particularly video games. This raises the question of whether proposed regulatory measures would be effective. Since the early 2000s, the Chinese government has been enacting regulations to directly restrict young people's playtime. In November 2019, it limited players aged under 18 to 1.5 hours of daily playtime and 3 hours on public holidays. Using telemetry data on over seven billion hours of playtime provided by a stakeholder from the video games industry, we found no credible evidence for overall reduction in the prevalence of heavy playtime following the implementation of regulations: individual accounts became 1.14 times more likely to play heavily in any given week (95% confidence interval 1.139-1.141). This falls below our preregistered smallest effect size of interest (2.0) and thus is not interpreted as a practically meaningful increase. Results remain robust across a variety of sensitivity analyses, including an analysis of more recent (2021) adjustments to playtime regulation. This casts doubt on the effectiveness of such state-controlled playtime mandates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37563302
doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01669-8
pii: 10.1038/s41562-023-01669-8
pmc: PMC10593605
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1753-1766Subventions
Organisme : RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
ID : iGGi DTC
Organisme : RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
ID : EP/S022325/1
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Behav Addict. 2022 May 27;11(2):249-255
pubmed: 35895617
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jul 27;9(7):220411
pubmed: 35911206
J Behav Addict. 2021 Nov 10;:
pubmed: 34762067
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 03;18(21):
pubmed: 34770077
Addict Behav Rep. 2019 Nov 11;10:100232
pubmed: 31832537
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;47(1):71-83
pubmed: 29623484
J Behav Addict. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):1-9
pubmed: 29529886
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;19(15):
pubmed: 35954678
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61098
pubmed: 23560113
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):415-420
pubmed: 27413060
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023 Feb;28(1):155-157
pubmed: 36510354
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):503-517
pubmed: 28859487
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1143-1157
pubmed: 32603635
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):103-109
pubmed: 27599673
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):296-301
pubmed: 28816501
Games Health J. 2020 Aug;9(4):255-264
pubmed: 32053021
Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):e319-29
pubmed: 21242221
J Affect Disord. 2021 Apr 1;284:136-142
pubmed: 33592432
BJPsych Int. 2022 Aug;19(3):63-66
pubmed: 36287819
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jun 1;176(6):543-544
pubmed: 35377394
Comput Human Behav. 2017 Mar;68:472-479
pubmed: 28260834
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 May;37(3):545-557
pubmed: 36355659
J Adolesc Health. 2018 May;62(5):548-555
pubmed: 29434003
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;174(3):230-236
pubmed: 27809571
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Nov;216:124-132
pubmed: 30257787
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):267-270
pubmed: 28033714
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;56(2):207-217
pubmed: 32743778
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Feb 17;8(2):202049
pubmed: 33972879
Front Psychol. 2021 May 10;12:651530
pubmed: 34040562
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Oct;12(5):485-92
pubmed: 19772442
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):e1563
pubmed: 25730697
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 15;19:101117
pubmed: 32637300
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e143
pubmed: 33640074