Measuring social and emotional learning implementation in a research-practice partnership.

implementation implementation science measurement researcher practitioner partnerships social and emotional learning (SEL)

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 24 09 2022
accepted: 30 03 2023
medline: 11 8 2023
pubmed: 11 8 2023
entrez: 11 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The measurement of social and emotional learning (SEL) implementation is a critical part of enhancing and understanding the effects of SEL programming. Research has shown that high-quality SEL implementation is associated with social, emotional, and academic outcomes. Schools achieve these outcomes in part through organizational practices that emphasize ongoing communication, collaboration, coordination, shared decision making, and strategic planning, processes that are ideally informed by evidence. The application of implementation science to SEL has advanced our understanding of the role of implementation in achieving student outcomes. However, the development of practical approaches for measuring and supporting SEL implementation have lagged behind work on measuring student SEL outcomes. Research-practitioner partnerships (RPP), long-term, mutually-beneficial collaborations geared toward identifying problems of practice and testing solutions for improvement, are a promising means for addressing this important gap. Though implementation science and RPPs have complementary aims, there has been limited attention to the integration of these approaches in the context of SEL programming. The goal of this paper is to offer practical strategies for measuring and using SEL implementation data in schools, using the example of an RPP that used implementation science practices to guide SEL implementation. We give special attention to structures that can support the collection and use of implementation data to improve practice, as well as considerations around developing measures, considering trade-offs of data collection decisions, and conducting data analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37564314
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052877
pmc: PMC10410557
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1052877

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Grant, Meyer and Strambler.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Child Dev. 2023 Jul 13;:
pubmed: 37448158
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112376
pubmed: 31036287
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(2):283-287
pubmed: 31789545
Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017;69(Suppl 2):107-131
pubmed: 28989188
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3:32
pubmed: 26376626
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81
pubmed: 18302018
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):282-4
pubmed: 22688847
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):462-80
pubmed: 22644083
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50
pubmed: 18322790
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):405-32
pubmed: 21291449

Auteurs

Nickholas Grant (N)

Division of Prevention and Community Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Joanna L Meyer (JL)

Division of Prevention and Community Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Michael J Strambler (MJ)

Division of Prevention and Community Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Classifications MeSH