Measuring social and emotional learning implementation in a research-practice partnership.
implementation
implementation science
measurement
researcher practitioner partnerships
social and emotional learning (SEL)
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
24
09
2022
accepted:
30
03
2023
medline:
11
8
2023
pubmed:
11
8
2023
entrez:
11
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The measurement of social and emotional learning (SEL) implementation is a critical part of enhancing and understanding the effects of SEL programming. Research has shown that high-quality SEL implementation is associated with social, emotional, and academic outcomes. Schools achieve these outcomes in part through organizational practices that emphasize ongoing communication, collaboration, coordination, shared decision making, and strategic planning, processes that are ideally informed by evidence. The application of implementation science to SEL has advanced our understanding of the role of implementation in achieving student outcomes. However, the development of practical approaches for measuring and supporting SEL implementation have lagged behind work on measuring student SEL outcomes. Research-practitioner partnerships (RPP), long-term, mutually-beneficial collaborations geared toward identifying problems of practice and testing solutions for improvement, are a promising means for addressing this important gap. Though implementation science and RPPs have complementary aims, there has been limited attention to the integration of these approaches in the context of SEL programming. The goal of this paper is to offer practical strategies for measuring and using SEL implementation data in schools, using the example of an RPP that used implementation science practices to guide SEL implementation. We give special attention to structures that can support the collection and use of implementation data to improve practice, as well as considerations around developing measures, considering trade-offs of data collection decisions, and conducting data analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37564314
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052877
pmc: PMC10410557
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1052877Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Grant, Meyer and Strambler.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Child Dev. 2023 Jul 13;:
pubmed: 37448158
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112376
pubmed: 31036287
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(2):283-287
pubmed: 31789545
Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017;69(Suppl 2):107-131
pubmed: 28989188
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3:32
pubmed: 26376626
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81
pubmed: 18302018
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):282-4
pubmed: 22688847
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):462-80
pubmed: 22644083
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50
pubmed: 18322790
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):405-32
pubmed: 21291449