Metoprolol or Verapamil in the Management of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review.
beta-blockers
calcium channel blockers
hocm
left ventricular outflow obstruction
metoprolol
sudden cardiac death (scd)
verapamil
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
15
05
2023
accepted:
09
08
2023
medline:
11
8
2023
pubmed:
11
8
2023
entrez:
11
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease and is a prevalent cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). This study aims to establish the benefits and therapeutic value metoprolol or verapamil offer to patients who suffer from symptoms caused by HCM, with regard to resolving left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), as well as improving a patient's quality of life and reducing symptoms. We conducted a systematic review to find clinical studies that described the use of metoprolol or verapamil in the management of HCM. Three databases were analyzed for studies, PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. We discovered 6,260 potentially eligible records across all the databases. According to our eligibility criteria, we included four studies in this review. Metoprolol showed median left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients of 25 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg (P = 0.007) at rest, 28 mm Hg versus 62 mm Hg (P < 0.001) at peak exercise, and 45 mm Hg versus 115 mm Hg (P < 0.001) post-exercise. Verapamil also showed a statistically significant increase in exercise capacity. Both drugs have been shown to be safe to use with a good side effect profile; however, metoprolol was better tolerated in the patient population that was tested in the studies collected. In this study, metoprolol was effective in reducing LVOT and improving the quality of life in patients, while verapamil showed variable effects on both exercise capacity and baseline hemodynamics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37565181
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43197
pmc: PMC10411313
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e43197Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Taha et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Circ Res. 2017 Sep 15;121(7):749-770
pubmed: 28912181
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jul;20(1):42-52
pubmed: 1607537
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jun;21(7):1672-9
pubmed: 8496536
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Dec 21;78(25):2505-2517
pubmed: 34915981
Jpn Heart J. 1986 Sep;27(5):701-15
pubmed: 3546779
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):8-23
pubmed: 36181355
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Dec;36(7):2219-25
pubmed: 11127464
Circulation. 1998 Feb 10;97(5):461-6
pubmed: 9490241
Heart. 2001 Dec;86(6):709-14
pubmed: 11711479
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Jan;49(1):35-43
pubmed: 34322777
Jpn Heart J. 1976 Sep;17(5):611-29
pubmed: 136532
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008
pubmed: 28935701
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 20;66(16):1845-1846
pubmed: 26483113
JAMA. 2002 Mar 13;287(10):1308-20
pubmed: 11886323
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Jun;22(3):260-6
pubmed: 27054628