The association between the incidence of postmenopausal breast cancer and occupational exposure to selected organic solvents, Montreal, Canada, 2008-2011.

breast cancer case-control study occupational exposures organic solvents population-based postmenopausal

Journal

American journal of industrial medicine
ISSN: 1097-0274
Titre abrégé: Am J Ind Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8101110

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised: 17 07 2023
received: 03 05 2023
accepted: 27 07 2023
pubmed: 11 8 2023
medline: 11 8 2023
entrez: 11 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among women and recognized risk factors explain 25%-47% of cases. Organic solvents are used widely in the workplace and exposure may increase the risk of developing breast cancer, yet there are insufficient data to confirm this hypothesis. We sought to determine whether past occupational exposures to selected organic solvents were associated with the incidence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Montréal, Canada. From a population-based case-control study (2008-2011), using in-depth interviews we elicited information on risk factors and lifetime occupational histories. Industrial hygienists and chemists translated job descriptions into specific chemical and physical exposures. We assessed 11 individual solvents and four solvent groups. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for metrics of past exposures to selected solvents. Exposure metrics included any previous exposure, average frequency in hours per week, duration in years, and average cumulative concentration weighted by hours per workweek exposed. We enrolled 695 cases and 608 controls. We found increased ORs for average cumulative concentration of exposure to mononuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.28), chlorinated alkanes (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.23, 5.68), toluene (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.59), and a group of organic solvents with reactive metabolites (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.24). Positive associations were found across all exposure metrics and were higher among women with estrogen-positive/progesterone-negative tumors. Our findings suggest occupational exposure to certain organic solvents may increase the risk of incident postmenopausal breast cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among women and recognized risk factors explain 25%-47% of cases. Organic solvents are used widely in the workplace and exposure may increase the risk of developing breast cancer, yet there are insufficient data to confirm this hypothesis. We sought to determine whether past occupational exposures to selected organic solvents were associated with the incidence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Montréal, Canada.
METHODS METHODS
From a population-based case-control study (2008-2011), using in-depth interviews we elicited information on risk factors and lifetime occupational histories. Industrial hygienists and chemists translated job descriptions into specific chemical and physical exposures. We assessed 11 individual solvents and four solvent groups. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for metrics of past exposures to selected solvents. Exposure metrics included any previous exposure, average frequency in hours per week, duration in years, and average cumulative concentration weighted by hours per workweek exposed.
RESULTS RESULTS
We enrolled 695 cases and 608 controls. We found increased ORs for average cumulative concentration of exposure to mononuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.28), chlorinated alkanes (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.23, 5.68), toluene (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.59), and a group of organic solvents with reactive metabolites (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.24). Positive associations were found across all exposure metrics and were higher among women with estrogen-positive/progesterone-negative tumors.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest occupational exposure to certain organic solvents may increase the risk of incident postmenopausal breast cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37565624
doi: 10.1002/ajim.23525
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

911-927

Subventions

Organisme : Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation
Organisme : Cancer Research Society
Organisme : Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Industrial Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Brenner DR, Poirier A, Woods RR, et al. Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2022. Can Med Assoc J. 2022;194(17):E601-E607.
Labrèche F, Goldberg MS, Hashim D, Weiderpass E. Breast cancer. Chap 24. 2nd ed. Springer; 2020.
Coyle YM. The effect of environment on breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;84(3):273-288.
Madigan MP, Ziegler RG, Benichou J, Byrne C, Hoover RN. Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(22):1681-1685.
Seidman H, Stellman SD, Mushinski MH. A different perspective on breast cancer risk factors: some implications of the nonattributable risk. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1982;32(5):301-313.
Hulka BS, Liu ET, Lininger RA. Steroid hormones and risk of breast cancer. Cancer. 1994;74(S3):1111-1124.
Labreche FP, Goldberg MS. Exposure to organic solvents and breast cancer in women: a hypothesis. Am J Ind Med. 1997;32(1):1-14.
NIOSH. Organic Solvents. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018.
Safety CCfOHa. The Health and Safety Report. Safety CCfOHa; 2005.
Dick FD. Solvent neurotoxicity. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(3):221-226.
Semple S. Dermal exposure to chemicals in the workplace: just how important is skin absorption? Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(4):376-382.
Toftgård R, Gustafsson JA. Biotransformation of organic solvents: a review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1980;6:1-18.
Attia SM. Deleterious effects of reactive metabolites. Oxid Med Cell Longevity. 2010;3(4):238-253.
Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE. Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA. 2003;289(11):1421-1424.
Petralia S, Vena J, Freudenheim J, et al. Risk of premenopausal breast cancer in association with occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and benzene. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25(3):215-221.
Labreche F, Goldberg MS, Valois MF, Nadon L. Postmenopausal breast cancer and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(4):263-269.
Aschengrau A, Paulu C, Ozonoff D. Tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water and the risk of breast cancer. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(suppl 4):947-953.
Aschengrau A, Rogers S, Ozonoff D. Perchloroethylene-contaminated drinking water and the risk of breast cancer: additional results from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(2):167-173.
Gallagher LG, Vieira VM, Ozonoff D, Webster TF, Aschengrau A. Risk of breast cancer following exposure to tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water in Cape Cod, Massachusetts: reanalysis of a case-control study using a modified exposure assessment. Environ Health. 2011;10:47.
Glass DC, Heyworth J, Thomson AK, Peters S, Saunders C, Fritschi L. Occupational exposure to solvents and risk of breast cancer. Am J Ind Med. 2015;58(9):915-922.
Peplonska B, Stewart P, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, et al. Occupational exposure to organic solvents and breast cancer in women. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(11):722-729.
Pedersen JE, Strandberg-Larsen K, Andersson M, Hansen J. Occupational exposure to specific organic solvents and risk of subtypes of breast cancer in a large population of Danish women, 1964-2016. Occup Environ Med. 2021;78(3):192-198.
Vieira V, Aschengrau A, Ozonoff D. Impact of tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water on the risk of breast cancer: using a dose model to assess exposure in a case-control study. Environ Health. 2005;4(1):3.
Font-Ribera L, Gràcia-Lavedan E, Aragonés N, et al. Long-term exposure to trihalomethanes in drinking water and breast cancer in the Spanish multicase-control study on cancer (MCC-Spain). Environ Int. 2018;112:227-234.
Ekenga CC, Parks CG, D'Aloisio AA, Deroo LA, Sandler DP. Breast cancer risk after occupational solvent exposure: the influence of timing and setting. Cancer Res. 2014;74(11):3076-3083.
Ekenga CC, Parks CG, Sandler DP. Chemical exposures in the workplace and breast cancer risk: a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(7):1765-1774.
Petralia SA, Chow WH, McLaughlin J, Jin F, Gao YT, Dosemeci M. Occupational risk factors for breast cancer among women in Shanghai. Am J Ind Med. 1998;34(5):477-483.
Ray RM, Gao DL, Li W, et al. Occupational exposures and breast cancer among women textile workers in Shanghai. Epidemiology. 2007;18(3):383-392.
Rennix CP, Quinn MM, Amoroso PJ, Eisen EA, Wegman DH. Risk of breast cancer among enlisted Army women occupationally exposed to volatile organic compounds. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(3):157-167.
Sung TI, Chen PC, Jyuhn-Hsiarn Lee L, Lin YP, Hsieh GY, Wang JD. Increased standardized incidence ratio of breast cancer in female electronics workers. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:102.
Videnros C, Selander J, Wiebert P, et al. Postmenopausal breast cancer and occupational exposure to chemicals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(6):642-650.
Videnros C, Selander J, Wiebert P, et al. Investigating the risk of breast cancer among women exposed to chemicals: a nested case-control study using improved exposure estimates. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020;93(2):261-269.
Weiderpass E, Pukkala E, Kauppinen T, et al. Breast cancer and occupational exposures in women in Finland. Am J Ind Med. 1999;36(1):48-53.
Wennborg H, Yuen J, Nise G, Sasco AJ, Vainio H, Gustavsson P. Cancer incidence and work place exposure among Swedish biomedical research personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001;74(8):558-564.
Costantini AS, Gorini G, Consonni D, Miligi L, Giovannetti L, Quinn M. Exposure to benzene and risk of breast cancer among shoe factory workers in Italy. Tumori J. 2009;95(1):8-12.
Chang YM, Tai CF, Yang SC, et al. Cancer incidence among workers potentially exposed to chlorinated solvents in an electronics factory. J Occup Health. 2005;47(2):171-180.
Niehoff NM, Gammon MD, Keil AP, et al. Airborne mammary carcinogens and breast cancer risk in the Sister Study. Environ Int. 2019;130:104897.
Spirtas R, Stewart PA, Lee JS, et al. Retrospective cohort mortality study of workers at an aircraft maintenance facility. I. Epidemiological results. Br J Ind Med. 1991;48(8):515-530.
Chang YM, Tai CF, Yang SC, et al. A cohort mortality study of workers exposed to chlorinated organic solvents in Taiwan. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9):652-660.
Shannon HS, Haines T, Bernholz C, et al. Cancer morbidity in lamp manufacturing workers. Am J Ind Med. 1988;14(3):281-290.
Blair A, Hartge P, Stewart PA, McAdams M, Lubin J. Mortality and cancer incidence of aircraft maintenance workers exposed to trichloroethylene and other organic solvents and chemicals: extended follow up. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(3):161-171.
Coggon D, Ntani G, Harris EC, Palmer KT. Risk of cancer in workers exposed to styrene at eight British companies making glass-reinforced plastics. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(3):165-170.
Lipworth L, Sonderman JS, Mumma MT, et al. Cancer mortality among aircraft manufacturing workers: an extended follow-up. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(9):992-1007.
Radican L, Blair A, Stewart P, Wartenberg D. Mortality of aircraft maintenance workers exposed to trichloroethylene and other hydrocarbons and chemicals: extended follow-up. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(11):1306-1319.
Sathiakumar N, Delzell E. A follow-up study of mortality among women in the North American synthetic rubber industry. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(11):1314-1325.
Callahan CL, Stewart PA, Blair A, Purdue MP. Extended mortality follow-up of a cohort of dry cleaners. Epidemiology. 2019;30(2):285-290.
Goldberg MS, Labrèche F, Weichenthal S, et al. The association between the incidence of postmenopausal breast cancer and concentrations at street-level of nitrogen dioxide and ultrafine particles. Environ Res. 2017;158:7-15.
Wang Q, Goldberg MS, Labrèche F, Ho V. The association between the incidence of post-menopausal breast cancer and residential greenness. Cancer Epidemiol. 2022;76:102094.
Organization WH. Research on the Menopause: Report of a WHO Scientific Group [Meeting Held in Geneva From 8 to 12 December 1980]. World Health Organization; 1981.
WHO scientific group on research on the menopause in the 1990s. Research on the Menopause in the 1990s. World Health Organization;1996.
Hart JE, Bertrand KA, Dupre N, et al. Exposure to hazardous air pollutants and risk of incident breast cancer in the nurses' health study II. Environ Health. 2018;17(1):28.
Batisse E, Labrèche F, Goldberg MS, et al. Inter-rater reliability of occupational exposure assessment in a case-control study of female breast cancer. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2021;18:522-531.
Sauvé JF, Lavoué J, Nadon L, et al. A hybrid expert approach for retrospective assessment of occupational exposures in a population-based case-control study of cancer. Environ Health. 2019;18(1):14.
Gérin M, Siemiatycki J, Kemper H, Bégin D. Obtaining occupational exposure histories in epidemiologic case-control studies. J Occup Med. 1985;27:420-426.
Stewart PA, Stewart WF, Siemiatycki J, Heineman EF, Dosemeci M. Questionnaires for collecting detailed occupational information for community-based case control studies. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998;59(1):39-44.
Florath I, Glass DC, Rhazi MS, Parent ME, Fritschi L. Inter-rater agreement between exposure assessment using automatic algorithms and using experts. Ann Work Expo Health. 2019;63(1):45-53.
Fritschi L, Nadon L, Benke G, et al. Validation of expert assessment of occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2003;43(5):519-522.
Goldberg MS, Siemiatycki J, Gerin M. Inter-rater agreement in assessing occupational exposure in a case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 1986;43(10):667-676.
Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA. A prediction-based approach to modelling temporal and spatial variability of traffic-related air pollution in Montreal, Canada. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(32):5075-5084.
Weichenthal S, Ryswyk KV, Goldstein A, Bagg S, Shekkarizfard M, Hatzopoulou M. A land use regression model for ambient ultrafine particles in Montreal, Canada: a comparison of linear regression and a machine learning approach. Environ Res. 2016;146:65-72.
Pettorelli N. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Oxford University Press; 2013.
Pinault L, Christidis T, Toyib O, Crouse DL. Ethnocultural and socioeconomic disparities in exposure to residential greenness within urban Canada. Health Rep. 2021;32(5):3-14.
Crouse DL, Ross NA, Goldberg MS. Double burden of deprivation and high concentrations of ambient air pollution at the neighbourhood scale in Montreal, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(6):971-981.
Goldberg MS, Baumgartner J, Chevrier J. Statistical adjustments of environmental pollutants arising from multiple sources in epidemiologic studies: the role of markers of complex mixtures. Atmos Environ. 2022;270:118788.
Day NE, Byar DP, Green SB. Overadjustment in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112(5):696-706.
American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2019-2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. Inc. 2019;1-44.
Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643-653.
Xu M, Richardson L, Campbell S, Pintos J, Siemiatycki J. Response rates in case-control studies of cancer by era of fieldwork and by characteristics of study design. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(6):385-391.
Wang DKW, Austin CC. Determination of complex mixtures of volatile organic compounds in ambient air: an overview. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006;386(4):1089-1098.
Weisskopf MG, Seals RM, Webster TF. Bias amplification in epidemiologic analysis of exposure to mixtures. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(4):047003.
Weisskopf MG, Webster TF. Trade-offs of personal versus more proxy exposure measures in environmental epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2017;28(5):635-643.

Auteurs

Sydney Westra (S)

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Mark S Goldberg (MS)

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

France Labrèche (F)

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Centre de recherche en santé publique (CReSP), University of Montréal and CIUSSS Centre-Sud, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Jill Baumgartner (J)

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Ethics, Equity and Policy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Vikki Ho (V)

Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub Université de Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal School of Public Health (ESPUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Classifications MeSH