Big Data Analysis of Glaucoma Prevalence in Israel.
Journal
Journal of glaucoma
ISSN: 1536-481X
Titre abrégé: J Glaucoma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9300903
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2023
01 11 2023
Historique:
received:
03
03
2023
accepted:
10
07
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
11
8
2023
entrez:
11
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The prevalence of glaucoma in the adult population included in this study was 2.3%. Normal values of routine eye examinations are provided including age and sex variations. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prevalence of glaucoma in a very large database. Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients examined at the Medical Survey Institute of a tertiary care university referral center between 2001 and 2020. A natural language process (NLP) algorithm identified patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma. The main outcome measures included the prevalence and age distribution of glaucoma. The secondary outcome measures included the prevalence and distribution of visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR). Data were derived from 184,589 visits of 36,762 patients (mean age: 52 y, 68% males). The NLP model was highly sensitive in identifying glaucoma, achieving an accuracy of 94.98% (area under the curve=93.85%), and 633 of 27,517 patients (2.3%) were diagnosed as having glaucoma with increasing prevalence in older age. The mean VA was 20/21, IOP 14.4±2.84 mm Hg, and CDR 0.28±0.16, higher in males. The VA decreased with age, while the IOP and CDR increased with age. The prevalence of glaucoma in the adult population included in this study was 2.3%. Normal values of routine eye examinations are provided including age and sex variations. We proved the validity and accuracy of the NLP model in identifying glaucoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37566879
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002281
pii: 00061198-990000000-00262
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
962-967Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Holm E, Holm M, Vilhelmsen K, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in the Faroese population. J Glaucoma. 2022;31:72–78.
Guo B, Tan Y, Nygaard S, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: the Vientiane Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106:1121–1125.
Chan EW, Li X, Tham YC, et al. Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:78–85.
Levkovitch-Verbin H, Goldshtein I, Chodick G, et al. The Maccabi Glaucoma Study: prevalence and incidence of glaucoma in a large israeli health maintenance organization. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:402.e1–408.e1.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436–444.
Gargeya R, Leng T. Automated identification of diabetic retinopathy using deep learning. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:962–969.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–2410.
Burlina PM, Joshi N, Pekala M, et al. Automated grading of age-related macular degeneration from color fundus images using deep convolutional neural networks. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:1170–1176.
Brown JM, Campbell JP, Beers A, et al. Automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using deep convolutional neural networks. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:803–810.
Baxter SL, Saseendrakumar BR, Paul P, et al. Predictive analytics for glaucoma using data from the all of Us Research Program. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;227:74–86.
Salvi M, Dazzi D, Pellistri I, et al. Classification and prediction of the progression of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy by an artificial neural network. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1703–1708.
Ting DSW, Pasquale LR, Peng L, et al. Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:167–175.
Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090.
Klein R, Lee KE, Gangnon RE, et al. Incidence of visual impairment over a 20-year period: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1210–1219.
Jonas JB, Xu L, Wang YX. The Beijing Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:247–261.
AREDS2 Research Group, Chew EY, Clemons T, SanGiovanni JP, et al. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2): study design and baseline characteristics (AREDS2 report number 1). Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2282–2289.
Moore M, Butler JS, Flitcroft DI, et al. Big data analysis of vision screening standards used to evaluate fitness to drive. Curr Eye Res. 2022;47:953–962.
Kim YJ, Kim JM, Shim SH, et al. Epidemiologic Survey Committee of the Korean Ophthalmological Society. Associations between optic cup-to-disc ratio and systemic factors in the healthy Korean population. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2015;29:336–343.
Pakravan M, Javadi MA, Yazdani S, et al. Distribution of intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and vertical cup-to-disc ratio in a healthy Iranian population: the Yazd Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e144–e151.
Aj T, Rn W, Lm Z, et al. The relationship between cup-to-disc ratio and estimated number of retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:3205–3214.
Shin J, Kang MS, Park K, et al. Association between metabolic risk factors and optic disc cupping identified by deep learning method. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0239071.