The first external validation of the Dallas steatosis index in biopsy-proven Non-alcoholic fatty liver Disease: A multicenter study.
Liver fibrosis
Liver steatosis
Net-benefit analysis
Non-invasive tool
Validation study
Journal
Diabetes research and clinical practice
ISSN: 1872-8227
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Res Clin Pract
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8508335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
20
06
2023
revised:
04
08
2023
accepted:
07
08
2023
pubmed:
12
8
2023
medline:
12
8
2023
entrez:
11
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A new non-invasive tool (NIT) for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) proposed in 2022 by the multi-ethnic Dallas Heart Study, i.e. the Dallas Steatosis Index (DSI), was validated herein using for the first time the gold standard i.e. liver biopsy-proven NAFLD. This is a multicenter study based on samples and data from two Gastroenterology-Hepatology Clinics (Greece and Australia) and one Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Clinic (Italy). Overall, n = 455 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (n = 374) and biopsy-proven controls (n = 81) were recruited. The ability of DSI to correctly classify participants as NAFLD or controls was very good, reaching an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.887. The cut-off point that could best differentiate the presence vs. absence of NAFLD corresponded to DSI = 0.0 (risk threshold: 50% | Sensitivity: 0.88; Positive Predictive Value (PPV): 93.0%; F1-score = 0.91). DSI demonstrated significantly better performance characteristics than other liver steatosis indexes. Decision curve analysis revealed that the benefit of DSI as a marker to indicate the need for invasive liver assessment was confirmed only when higher DSI values, i.e. ≥ 1.4, were used as risk thresholds. DSI performance to differentiate disease progression was inadequate (all AUCs < 0.700). DSI is more useful for disease screening (NAFLD vs. controls) than to differentiate diseases stages or progression. The value of any inclusion of DSI to guidelines needs to be further studied.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37567510
pii: S0168-8227(23)00633-2
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110870
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110870Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [CSM reports grants through his institution from Merck, Massachusetts Life Sciences Center and Boehringer Ingellheim, has been a shareholder of and has received grants through his Institution and personal consulting fees from Coherus Inc. and AltrixBio, he reports personal consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, reports personal consulting fees and support with research reagents from Ansh Inc., collaborative research support from LabCorp Inc., reports personal consulting fees from Genfit, Lumos, Amgen, Corcept, Intercept, 89 Bio, Madrigal and Regeneron, reports educational activity meals through his institution or national conferences from Esperion, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim and travel support and fees from TMIOA, Elsevier, and the Cardio Metabolic Health Conference. None is related to the work presented herein.].