Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study.
Bone mineral density
Cemented
Cementless
Femoral component migration
RSA
Unicompartmental knee replacement
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
17
10
2022
accepted:
10
07
2023
medline:
13
11
2023
pubmed:
12
8
2023
entrez:
11
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The component design and fixation method of joint arthroplasty may affect component migration and survival. The aim of this study was to compare fixation of cementless twin-peg (CLTP), cemented twin-peg (CTP) and cemented single-peg (CSP) femoral components of medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Eighty patients (mean age = 63 years, 48 males) with medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized in three ways to CLTP (n = 25), CTP (n = 26) or CSP (n = 29) femoral UKR components. The patients were followed 5 years postoperatively with RSA, bone mineral density (BMD), PROMs and radiological evaluation of radiolucent lines (RLL), femoral component flexion angle and complications. At the 5-year follow-up, femoral component total translation was comparable between the three groups (p = 0.60). Femoral component internal rotation was 0.50° (95% CI 0.3; 0.69) for the CLTP group, 0.58° (95% CI 0.38; 0.77) for the CTP group and 0.25° (95% CI 0.07; 0.43) for the CSP group (p = 0.01). BMD decreased peri-prosthetically (range - 11.5%; - 14.0%) until 6-month follow-up and increased toward the 5-year follow-up (range - 3.6%; - 5.8%). BMD change did not correlate with component migration. Lower flexion angle was correlated with higher 5-year subsidence, total translation, varus rotation and maximum total point motion (p = 0.01). Two patients (1 CLTP, 1 CTP) had RLL in the posterior zone. There were two revisions. At 5-year follow-up, fixation of UKA femoral components with twin-peg was not superior to the single-peg design. Cementless and cemented twin-peg femoral components had similar fixation. A lower flexion angle was correlated with higher component migration.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The component design and fixation method of joint arthroplasty may affect component migration and survival. The aim of this study was to compare fixation of cementless twin-peg (CLTP), cemented twin-peg (CTP) and cemented single-peg (CSP) femoral components of medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR).
METHODS
METHODS
Eighty patients (mean age = 63 years, 48 males) with medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized in three ways to CLTP (n = 25), CTP (n = 26) or CSP (n = 29) femoral UKR components. The patients were followed 5 years postoperatively with RSA, bone mineral density (BMD), PROMs and radiological evaluation of radiolucent lines (RLL), femoral component flexion angle and complications.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At the 5-year follow-up, femoral component total translation was comparable between the three groups (p = 0.60). Femoral component internal rotation was 0.50° (95% CI 0.3; 0.69) for the CLTP group, 0.58° (95% CI 0.38; 0.77) for the CTP group and 0.25° (95% CI 0.07; 0.43) for the CSP group (p = 0.01). BMD decreased peri-prosthetically (range - 11.5%; - 14.0%) until 6-month follow-up and increased toward the 5-year follow-up (range - 3.6%; - 5.8%). BMD change did not correlate with component migration. Lower flexion angle was correlated with higher 5-year subsidence, total translation, varus rotation and maximum total point motion (p = 0.01). Two patients (1 CLTP, 1 CTP) had RLL in the posterior zone. There were two revisions.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
At 5-year follow-up, fixation of UKA femoral components with twin-peg was not superior to the single-peg design. Cementless and cemented twin-peg femoral components had similar fixation. A lower flexion angle was correlated with higher component migration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37568057
doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y
pii: 10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y
pmc: PMC10635966
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7169-7183Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Biomech. 2003 Jun;36(6):873-82
pubmed: 12742455
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jan;89(1):39-44
pubmed: 17259414
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:383-390
pubmed: 33408039
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):614-24
pubmed: 23140091
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2432-2441
pubmed: 30179951
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1776-1785
pubmed: 29147743
Acta Orthop. 2010 Aug;81(4):463-70
pubmed: 20809744
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):87-100
pubmed: 29529622
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Mar 14;15(1):51
pubmed: 28292292
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):52-7
pubmed: 19092004
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):694-702
pubmed: 26611902
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Jun;55:23-27
pubmed: 29649670
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4401-4409
pubmed: 36459235
J Orthop Res. 1995 May;13(3):347-56
pubmed: 7602396
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):185-91
pubmed: 25628280
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Aug;23(8):2230-2236
pubmed: 24770381
Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63
pubmed: 8450681
Acta Orthop. 2019 Feb;90(1):67-73
pubmed: 30526183
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Mar;92(3):367-73
pubmed: 20190307
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):174-9
pubmed: 20706811
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):377-83
pubmed: 7744919
Knee. 2012 Jan;19(1):36-40
pubmed: 21251839
J Biomech. 2011 Oct 13;44(15):2724-7
pubmed: 21907991
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1450-7
pubmed: 19225852
Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:245915
pubmed: 24383006
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):262-7
pubmed: 27088580
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):896-901
pubmed: 24986942
Knee. 2015 Sep;22(4):333-7
pubmed: 26003214
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jul;137(7):1011-1017
pubmed: 28439705
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb;27(2):541-548
pubmed: 30251101
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96
pubmed: 9699158
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Feb;142(2):301-314
pubmed: 33630155
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Feb;26(2):192-7
pubmed: 20667688
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72
pubmed: 16195075
Bone Joint J. 2014 Mar;96-B(3):345-9
pubmed: 24589789
Osteoporos Int. 1995;5(4):262-70
pubmed: 7492865
Acta Orthop. 2020 Aug;91(4):420-425
pubmed: 32420778
Int Orthop. 2016 Feb;40(2):285-94
pubmed: 26183139
Knee. 2009 Dec;16(6):473-8
pubmed: 19464898
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Feb;19(2):277-84
pubmed: 20640402
Knee. 2013 Mar;20(2):120-7
pubmed: 23154036
Knee. 2009 Jun;16(3):200-6
pubmed: 19097910
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:62-5
pubmed: 22262426
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0170324
pubmed: 28103308