Assessment by Women on Selected Aspects of Quality of Life and on Disease Acceptance after Undergoing Urogynecological Procedures for Urinary Incontinence.

quality of life urinary incontinence urologic surgical procedures

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 23 06 2023
revised: 17 07 2023
accepted: 22 07 2023
medline: 12 8 2023
pubmed: 12 8 2023
entrez: 12 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Urinary incontinence is a common social and health problem that affects both men and women. Women, however, are twice as likely as men to experience unintentional and involuntary bladder emptying due to their anatomical structure and biological functions. Urinary incontinence is associated with great discomfort, a sense of shame, and a significant reduction in self-esteem, often resulting in the limiting of, or withdrawing from, professional, social, and community life. The aim of this study was to evaluate selected aspects of the quality of life and disease acceptance by women who had undergone urogynecological procedures for urinary incontinence. The study encompassed 77 women. The diagnostic tools used in the study were the Polish versions of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS), and the authors' own survey questionnaire. From the undertaken research, we found that women with urinary incontinence who underwent urogynecological procedures rated their overall health well. What worsened the most regarding the quality of life of women post-procedure for urinary incontinence was the impact of bladder problems on their lives and the discomfort they felt due to bladder problems. The relationship between the time elapsed since the procedure and the quality of life of the respondents with regard to the emotions they experienced was also found to be significant. The longer the time since the procedure, the lower the intensity of negative emotions, and thus the higher the quality of life. Despite the varied opinions of the respondents about the impact of bladder dysfunction on various areas of their lives, acceptance of the disease, as measured by the AIS scale, appeared to be high.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37568296
pii: jcm12154894
doi: 10.3390/jcm12154894
pmc: PMC10419866
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Actas Urol Esp. 2010 Mar;34(3):242-50
pubmed: 20416241
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):337
pubmed: 34544393
Urology. 2019 Oct;132:75-80
pubmed: 31310769
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):e12762
pubmed: 31297932
Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(12):850-855
pubmed: 33914301
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2015 Mar-Apr;61(2):178-83
pubmed: 26107369
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):521-530
pubmed: 28780650
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jan;33(1):25-35
pubmed: 32964401
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011 Oct;123(19-20):607-10
pubmed: 21935649
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 24;15(1):63
pubmed: 28335792
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Jan;25(2):643-653
pubmed: 33577017
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 May;19(3):286-8
pubmed: 15512297
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Summer;20(3):167-80
pubmed: 25484563
BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1388-95
pubmed: 18454794
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Jul-Aug;47(6):376-381
pubmed: 36842707
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 16;19(1):87
pubmed: 33726776
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;5(4):
pubmed: 33233663
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Dec;104(12):1374-9
pubmed: 9422015
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Feb;51(2):102288
pubmed: 34902634
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):499-508
pubmed: 30644584
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Dec;31(12):2625-2630
pubmed: 32821964
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):1083-1090
pubmed: 23635747
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1592-1604
pubmed: 29067433
Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Feb 23;48(1):100-109
pubmed: 29479966
Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(10):889-98
pubmed: 6729517
Int Neurourol J. 2010 Oct;14(3):133-8
pubmed: 21179330
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Jun;90(6):621-8
pubmed: 21371000
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 17;58(12):
pubmed: 36557065
Br J Nurs. 2016 Oct 13;25(18):S14-S21
pubmed: 27734727
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Dec;30(12):2135-2139
pubmed: 31396639
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Feb 24;16:535-544
pubmed: 32158213

Auteurs

Bożena Baczewska (B)

Department of Internal Medicine and Internal Medicine in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.

Katarzyna Wiśniewska (K)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Radom College, 1905 Roku 26/28, 26-600 Radom, Poland.

Bożena Muraczyńska (B)

Faculty of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Konarskiego 2, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland.

Małgorzata Pasek (M)

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences in Tarnów, 33-100 Tarnów, Poland.

Jolanta Słuszniak (J)

The J. Dietl Specialist Hospital, Skarbowa 4, 31-121 Kraków, Poland.

Katarzyna Gębicka (K)

Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 1, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.

Beata Guzak (B)

Center of Postgraduate Education for Nurses and Midwives, Pawińskiego 5A, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.

Classifications MeSH