Textbook Oncological Outcomes for Robotic Colorectal Cancer Resections: An Observational Study of Five Robotic Colorectal Units.
colon cancer
colorectal cancer
quality of care
rectal cancer
robotic surgery
surgical outcomes
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2023
25 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
23
04
2023
revised:
27
06
2023
accepted:
06
07
2023
medline:
12
8
2023
pubmed:
12
8
2023
entrez:
12
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The quality of care of patients receiving colorectal resections has conventionally relied on individual metrics. When discussing with patients what these outcomes mean, they often find them confusing or overwhelming. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) is a composite measure that summarises all the 'desirable' or 'ideal' postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes from both a patient's and doctor's point of view. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of TOO in patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer surgery in five robotic colorectal units and understand the risk factors associated with failure to achieve a TOO in these patients. We present a retrospective, multicentric study with data from a prospectively collected database. All consecutive patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer resections from five centres between 2013 and 2022 were included. Patient characteristics and short-term clinical and oncological data were collected. A TOO was achieved when all components were realized-no conversion to open, no complication with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3, length of hospital stay ≤ 14, no 30-day readmission, no 30-day mortality, and R0 resection. The main outcome measure was a composite measure of "ideal" practice called textbook oncological outcomes. A total of 501 patients submitted to robotic colorectal cancer resection were included. Of the 501 patients included, 388 (77.4%) achieved a TOO. Four patients were converted to open (0.8%); 55 (11%) had LOS > 14 days; 46 (9.2%) had a CD ≥ 3 complication; 30-day readmission rate was 6% (30); 30-day mortality was 0.2% (1); and 480 (95.8%) had an R0 resection. Abdominoperineal resection was a risk factor for not achieving a TOO. Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in robotic centres achieves a high TOO rate. Abdominoperineal resection is a risk factor for failure to achieve a TOO. This measure may be used in future audits and to inform patients clearly on success of treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The quality of care of patients receiving colorectal resections has conventionally relied on individual metrics. When discussing with patients what these outcomes mean, they often find them confusing or overwhelming. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) is a composite measure that summarises all the 'desirable' or 'ideal' postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes from both a patient's and doctor's point of view. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of TOO in patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer surgery in five robotic colorectal units and understand the risk factors associated with failure to achieve a TOO in these patients.
METHODS
METHODS
We present a retrospective, multicentric study with data from a prospectively collected database. All consecutive patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer resections from five centres between 2013 and 2022 were included. Patient characteristics and short-term clinical and oncological data were collected. A TOO was achieved when all components were realized-no conversion to open, no complication with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3, length of hospital stay ≤ 14, no 30-day readmission, no 30-day mortality, and R0 resection. The main outcome measure was a composite measure of "ideal" practice called textbook oncological outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 501 patients submitted to robotic colorectal cancer resection were included. Of the 501 patients included, 388 (77.4%) achieved a TOO. Four patients were converted to open (0.8%); 55 (11%) had LOS > 14 days; 46 (9.2%) had a CD ≥ 3 complication; 30-day readmission rate was 6% (30); 30-day mortality was 0.2% (1); and 480 (95.8%) had an R0 resection. Abdominoperineal resection was a risk factor for not achieving a TOO.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in robotic centres achieves a high TOO rate. Abdominoperineal resection is a risk factor for failure to achieve a TOO. This measure may be used in future audits and to inform patients clearly on success of treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37568576
pii: cancers15153760
doi: 10.3390/cancers15153760
pmc: PMC10417291
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):544-55
pubmed: 20110514
Surgery. 2022 Oct;172(4):1039-1040
pubmed: 36150773
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):991-1004
pubmed: 36087608
Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):625-31; discussion 631-2
pubmed: 25203879
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;46(6):1144-1150
pubmed: 32178963
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jun;53(6):874-80
pubmed: 20485000
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Mar;25(3):775-785
pubmed: 32779080
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22447
pubmed: 33019430
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;39(2):156-63
pubmed: 23102705
J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):433-436
pubmed: 28916892
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;23(10):2714-2722
pubmed: 34174142
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14359-70
pubmed: 25339823
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2821-2829
pubmed: 34120807
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Oct;18(10):O380-O384
pubmed: 27440280
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;22(11):1506-1517
pubmed: 32333491
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6796-6806
pubmed: 33289055
Am J Surg. 2002 Jun;183(6):630-41
pubmed: 12095591
ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:293894
pubmed: 22655207
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jun;26(6):1286-1297
pubmed: 35441331
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;21(3):270-276
pubmed: 30489676