Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury Using Bio-Clinical Markers at Presentation to the Emergency Department.
brain injury
head
machine learning
predictors
support vector machine
trauma
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2023
05 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
08
06
2023
revised:
11
07
2023
accepted:
02
08
2023
medline:
12
8
2023
pubmed:
12
8
2023
entrez:
12
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality is essential for better management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been shown to be effective in predicting clinical outcomes. This study aimed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in TBI patients using ML algorithms. A retrospective study was performed using data from both the trauma registry and electronic medical records among TBI patients admitted to the Hamad Trauma Center in Qatar between June 2016 and May 2021. Thirteen features were selected for four ML models including a Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XgBoost), to predict the in-hospital mortality. A dataset of 922 patients was analyzed, of which 78% survived and 22% died. The AUC scores for SVM, LR, XgBoost, and RF models were 0.86, 0.84, 0.85, and 0.86, respectively. XgBoost and RF had good AUC scores but exhibited significant differences in log loss between the training and testing sets (% difference in logloss of 79.5 and 41.8, respectively), indicating overfitting compared to the other models. The feature importance trend across all models indicates that aPTT, INR, ISS, prothrombin time, and lactic acid are the most important features in prediction. Magnesium also displayed significant importance in the prediction of mortality among serum electrolytes. SVM was found to be the best-performing ML model in predicting the mortality of TBI patients. It had the highest AUC score and did not show overfitting, making it a more reliable model compared to LR, XgBoost, and RF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality is essential for better management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been shown to be effective in predicting clinical outcomes. This study aimed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in TBI patients using ML algorithms.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
METHODS
A retrospective study was performed using data from both the trauma registry and electronic medical records among TBI patients admitted to the Hamad Trauma Center in Qatar between June 2016 and May 2021. Thirteen features were selected for four ML models including a Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XgBoost), to predict the in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A dataset of 922 patients was analyzed, of which 78% survived and 22% died. The AUC scores for SVM, LR, XgBoost, and RF models were 0.86, 0.84, 0.85, and 0.86, respectively. XgBoost and RF had good AUC scores but exhibited significant differences in log loss between the training and testing sets (% difference in logloss of 79.5 and 41.8, respectively), indicating overfitting compared to the other models. The feature importance trend across all models indicates that aPTT, INR, ISS, prothrombin time, and lactic acid are the most important features in prediction. Magnesium also displayed significant importance in the prediction of mortality among serum electrolytes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
SVM was found to be the best-performing ML model in predicting the mortality of TBI patients. It had the highest AUC score and did not show overfitting, making it a more reliable model compared to LR, XgBoost, and RF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37568968
pii: diagnostics13152605
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152605
pmc: PMC10417008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jan;102(1):68-75
pubmed: 32861669
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Jan;29(1):181-191
pubmed: 36258296
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:476-486.e1
pubmed: 28986230
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):e41819
pubmed: 36485032
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 May 7;4(1):78
pubmed: 33963275
BMJ. 2005 Dec 17;331(7530):1419-20
pubmed: 16356951
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e450-e458
pubmed: 33444843
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E2
pubmed: 30453455
Brain Sci. 2022 May 07;12(5):
pubmed: 35624999
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Mar;40(5-6):514-522
pubmed: 35950615
Neurosurgery. 2022 May 1;90(5):605-612
pubmed: 35244101
Epilepsia. 2003;44(s10):2-10
pubmed: 14511388
Emerg Med J. 2011 Dec;28(12):1026-31
pubmed: 21076055
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 3;18(1):e0278562
pubmed: 36595496
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Sep 22;3:1005168
pubmed: 36211830
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Oct;16(5):1135-1149
pubmed: 36237411
Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4
pubmed: 4136544
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 04;11(11):
pubmed: 34834496
J Neurosurg. 2019 May 10;132(6):1961-1969
pubmed: 31075779
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097
pubmed: 29701556
J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96
pubmed: 4814394
Shock. 2017 Nov;48(5):504-510
pubmed: 28498299
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug 3;17(1):42
pubmed: 35922831
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207192
pubmed: 30412613
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 10;8:792689
pubmed: 34957161
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):202-210
pubmed: 31359814
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):960
pubmed: 36653412
Injury. 2023 Mar;54(3):896-903
pubmed: 36732148
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Nov;38(11):2545-2555
pubmed: 30892204
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2022 Jun 02;10:4901008
pubmed: 35795876
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 24;10:1366
pubmed: 32038454
Injury. 2019 Jan;50(1):65-72
pubmed: 30213562
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 27;28(1):44
pubmed: 32460867
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 10;13:859068
pubmed: 35756926
Biomedicines. 2022 Mar 16;10(3):
pubmed: 35327488
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jul 18;5(1):96
pubmed: 35851612
Brain Inj. 2021 Jul 29;35(9):1095-1102
pubmed: 34357830
Neuroepidemiology. 2012;38(4):259-67
pubmed: 22678449
J Trauma. 1990 Oct;30(10):1200-7
pubmed: 2213928
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:6-21
pubmed: 28736357