Defending Others Online: The Influence of Observing Formal and Informal Social Control on One's Willingness to Defend Cyberhate Victims.
cyberhate
online hate
self-help
social control
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 08 2023
02 08 2023
Historique:
received:
09
05
2023
revised:
19
06
2023
accepted:
27
07
2023
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
12
8
2023
entrez:
12
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This paper examines factors correlated with online self-help-an informal form of social control vis-à-vis intervention-upon witnessing a cyberhate attack. Using online surveys from 18- to 26-year-old respondents in the United States, we explore the roles of various types of online and offline formal and informal social control mechanisms on the enactment of self-help through the use of descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression. The results of the multivariate analyses indicate that online collective efficacy is positively related to self-help, as is having close ties to individuals and groups offline and online. Formal online social control, however, is not significantly related to engaging in self-help. Other findings demonstrate that personal encounters with cyberhate affect the likelihood that an individual will intervene when witnessing an attack, and that individuals with high levels of empathy are more likely to intervene to assist others. This work indicates that pro-social online behavior is contagious and can potentially foster online spaces in which harmful behaviors, such as propagating cyberhate, are not condoned.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37569046
pii: ijerph20156506
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156506
pmc: PMC10419263
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 13;17(1):e1133
pubmed: 37050974
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):273-7
pubmed: 19207695
Violence Against Women. 2020 Apr;26(5):505-527
pubmed: 30940014
J Homosex. 2005;49(2):67-82
pubmed: 16048894
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Apr;17(4):207-15
pubmed: 24359305
Psychol Violence. 2015 Jul;5(3):227-235
pubmed: 26240776
Psychol Bull. 1986 Nov;100(3):309-30
pubmed: 3797558
Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24
pubmed: 9252316
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 Nov;10(3):215-21
pubmed: 5704479
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Apr;35(7-8):1694-1718
pubmed: 29294685
J Exp Soc Psychol. 1980 Mar;16(2):161-71
pubmed: 11650568
Violence Vict. 2016;31(4):708-26
pubmed: 27302929
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Sep;39(3):418-30
pubmed: 7431204
Child Dev. 1994 Dec;65(6):1799-813
pubmed: 7859556
Violence Against Women. 2020 Dec;26(15-16):2024-2040
pubmed: 31779537
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 Apr;8(4):377-83
pubmed: 5645600
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:365-92
pubmed: 15709940
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Apr;57(2):169-76
pubmed: 26946454
J Adolesc. 2016 Jun;49:60-7
pubmed: 27007497
Violence Vict. 2008;23(1):83-97
pubmed: 18396583
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jan;32(1):23-48
pubmed: 25948644
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):517-37
pubmed: 21534650
Aggress Behav. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):383-96
pubmed: 24838667
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jul;43(7):986-998
pubmed: 28903698