Investigation of Helix-Pultruded CFRP Rebar Geometry Variants for Carbon-Reinforced Concrete Structures.

carbon–concrete composites helix rebar pull-out test pultrusion tensile test

Journal

Polymers
ISSN: 2073-4360
Titre abrégé: Polymers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 03 05 2023
revised: 26 07 2023
accepted: 27 07 2023
medline: 12 8 2023
pubmed: 12 8 2023
entrez: 12 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Carbon concrete is a new, promising class of materials in the construction industry. This corrosion-resistant reinforcement material leads to a reduction in the concrete cover required for medial shielding. This enables lean construction and the conservation of concrete and energy-intensive cement manufacturing. Bar-type reinforcement is essential for heavily loaded structures. The newly developed helix pultrusion is the first process capable of producing carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement bars with a topological surface in a single pultrusion process step, with fiber orientation tailored to the specific loads. The manufacturing feasibility and load-bearing capacity were thoroughly tested and compared with other design and process variants. Approaches to increase stiffness and strength while maintaining good concrete anchorage have been presented and fabricated. Tensile testing of the helical rebar variants with a 7.2 mm lead-bearing cross-section was conducted using adapted wedge grips with a 300 mm restraint length. The new helix geometry variants achieved, on average, 40% higher strengths and almost reached the values of the base material. Concrete pull-out tests were carried out to evaluate the bond properties. The helix contour design caused the bar to twist out of the concrete test specimen. Utilizing the Rilem beam test setup, the helical contour bars could also be tested. Compared with the original helix variant, the pull-out forces could be increased from 8.5 kN to up to 22.4 kN, i.e., by a factor of 2.5. It was thus possible to derive a preferred solution that is optimally suited for use in carbon concrete.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37571179
pii: polym15153285
doi: 10.3390/polym15153285
pmc: PMC10422523
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research
ID : 03ZZ0325A
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research
ID : 03ZZ0356B
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research
ID : 03ZZ0311J

Références

Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;15(4):
pubmed: 35208159
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 12;15(14):
pubmed: 35888321
Polymers (Basel). 2023 May 04;15(9):
pubmed: 37177332

Auteurs

Daniel Wohlfahrt (D)

Institute of Lightweight Engineering and Polymer Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Holbeinstraße 3, 01307 Dresden, Germany.

Hannes Franz Maria Peller (HFM)

Institute of Lightweight Engineering and Polymer Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Holbeinstraße 3, 01307 Dresden, Germany.

Steffen Müller (S)

Institute of Construction Materials, Technische Universität Dresden, Georg-Schumann-Straße 7, 01187 Dresden, Germany.

Niels Modler (N)

Institute of Lightweight Engineering and Polymer Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Holbeinstraße 3, 01307 Dresden, Germany.

Viktor Mechtcherine (V)

Institute of Construction Materials, Technische Universität Dresden, Georg-Schumann-Straße 7, 01187 Dresden, Germany.

Classifications MeSH