Predictive Validity of Mortality after Surgically Treated Proximal Femur Fractures Based on Four Nutrition Scores-A Retrospective Data Analysis.


Journal

Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 30 06 2023
revised: 22 07 2023
accepted: 24 07 2023
medline: 14 8 2023
pubmed: 12 8 2023
entrez: 12 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hip fractures are becoming a growing concern due to an aging population. The high costs to the healthcare system and far-reaching consequences for those affected, including a loss of independence and increased mortality rates, make this issue important. Poor nutritional status is a common problem among geriatric patients and is associated with a worse prognosis. Nutritional screening tools can help identify high-risk patients and enable individualized care to improve survival rates. This retrospective study investigates four nutritional scores and laboratory parameters' predictive significance concerning postoperative mortality after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 month/s for patients over 60 years using the chi-square test, Cox regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines were used as part of the screening of the respective nutritional status of the patients, in particular to filter out malnutrition. A total of 1080 patients were included in this study, whereas 8.05% suffered from malnutrition, defined as a body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 kg/m MNA screening has a solid correlation and predictive significance regarding postoperative mortality-therefore routine implementation of this screening in orthopedic/traumatology wards is recommended. Moreover, nutritional substitution therapy can offer a relatively inexpensive and easy-to-implement measure. The Graz malnutrition screening (GMS) shows moderate predictive power and could be considered as an alternative for patients under 60 years of age. A higher albumin level is associated with improved survival probability, but cannot be indicative of nutritional status.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hip fractures are becoming a growing concern due to an aging population. The high costs to the healthcare system and far-reaching consequences for those affected, including a loss of independence and increased mortality rates, make this issue important. Poor nutritional status is a common problem among geriatric patients and is associated with a worse prognosis. Nutritional screening tools can help identify high-risk patients and enable individualized care to improve survival rates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
This retrospective study investigates four nutritional scores and laboratory parameters' predictive significance concerning postoperative mortality after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 month/s for patients over 60 years using the chi-square test, Cox regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines were used as part of the screening of the respective nutritional status of the patients, in particular to filter out malnutrition.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 1080 patients were included in this study, whereas 8.05% suffered from malnutrition, defined as a body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 kg/m
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
MNA screening has a solid correlation and predictive significance regarding postoperative mortality-therefore routine implementation of this screening in orthopedic/traumatology wards is recommended. Moreover, nutritional substitution therapy can offer a relatively inexpensive and easy-to-implement measure. The Graz malnutrition screening (GMS) shows moderate predictive power and could be considered as an alternative for patients under 60 years of age. A higher albumin level is associated with improved survival probability, but cannot be indicative of nutritional status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37571292
pii: nu15153357
doi: 10.3390/nu15153357
pmc: PMC10420813
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Br J Nutr. 2004 Nov;92(5):799-808
pubmed: 15533269
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 30;11:CD001880
pubmed: 27898998
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Aug 1;16(8):661-7
pubmed: 25864084
Bone Joint J. 2015 Mar;97-B(3):383-90
pubmed: 25737523
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Sep;23(9):2239-56
pubmed: 22419370
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 03;9(8):
pubmed: 28771192
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Jan 27;16:177-185
pubmed: 33542622
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20;99(24):2110-2118
pubmed: 29257017
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1994-2003
pubmed: 29183076
J Clin Med. 2019 May 31;8(6):
pubmed: 31159248
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Mar;70(3):393-8
pubmed: 26486304
Nutrients. 2018 Apr 30;10(5):
pubmed: 29710860
Nutr Clin Pract. 2008 Aug-Sep;23(4):388-96
pubmed: 18682590
Clin Nutr. 2016 Oct;35(5):1053-8
pubmed: 26231340
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Jan;95(1):26-8
pubmed: 23317722
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1458-1460
pubmed: 29699731
J Nutr Health Aging. 2006 Nov-Dec;10(6):466-85; discussion 485-7
pubmed: 17183419
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006 Oct;18(5):381-7
pubmed: 17167302
Nutrients. 2019 Aug 20;11(8):
pubmed: 31434232
Nutr Clin Pract. 2008 Aug-Sep;23(4):373-82
pubmed: 18682588
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2053-2062
pubmed: 29166235
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1287-1296
pubmed: 30852065
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2018 Jan/Mar;40(1):8-15
pubmed: 29384769
Bone. 2012 Sep;51(3):347-52
pubmed: 22705148
J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(9):964-968
pubmed: 27791228
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15;27(18-19):1129-41
pubmed: 16278182
Clin Nutr. 2008 Oct;27(5):706-16
pubmed: 18783855
Clin Nutr. 2003 Aug;22(4):415-21
pubmed: 12880610
Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):321-36
pubmed: 12765673
Br J Nutr. 2016 Feb 28;115(4):650-7
pubmed: 26652856
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2703-10
pubmed: 23546850
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246963
pubmed: 33592047
Epidemiology. 2021 May 1;32(3):425-433
pubmed: 33512961
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010 Dec;18(3):265-70
pubmed: 21187532
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 27;20(1):568
pubmed: 31775693
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Nov 15;170(10):1290-9
pubmed: 19808632

Auteurs

Domenik Popp (D)

Clinical Division of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Arastoo Nia (A)

Clinical Division of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Gregor Biedermann (G)

Clinical Division of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Lukas Schmoelz (L)

Clinical Division of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Sara Silvaieh (S)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Thomas M Tiefenboeck (TM)

Clinical Division of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Stefan Hajdu (S)

Clinical Division of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Harald K Widhalm (HK)

Clinical Division of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH