The Effects of Cellular Membrane Damage on the Long-Term Storage and Adhesion of Probiotic Bacteria in Caco-2 Cell Line.
fluid bed drying
imaging flow cytometry
lactic acid bacteria
quality control
stress
viability
Journal
Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Aug 2023
07 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
13
07
2023
revised:
31
07
2023
accepted:
05
08
2023
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
12
8
2023
entrez:
12
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adhesion is one of the main factors responsible for the probiotic properties of bacteria in the human gut. Membrane proteins affected by cellular damage are one of the key aspects determining adhesion. Fluid-bed-dried preparations containing probiotic bacteria were analyzed in terms of their stability (temperature of glass transition) and shelf life in different conditions (modified atmosphere, refrigeration). Imaging flow cytometry was utilized to determine four subpopulations of cells based on their physiological and morphological properties. Lastly, adhesion was measured in bacteria cultured in optimal conditions and treated with heat shock. The results show that the subpopulations with no or low levels of cell membrane damage exhibit the ability to adhere to Caco-2 cells. The temperature of protein denaturation in bacteria was recorded as being between 65 °C and 70 °C. The highest glass transition temperature (Tg) value for hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (used as a coating substance) was measured at 152.6 °C. Drying and coating can be utilized as a sufficient treatment, allowing a long shelf-life (up to 12 months). It is, however, worth noting that technological processing, especially with high temperatures, may decrease the probiotic value of the preparation by damaging the bacterial cells.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37571422
pii: nu15153484
doi: 10.3390/nu15153484
pmc: PMC10421378
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Oct 1;35(10):156
pubmed: 31576430
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(5):e2658
pubmed: 26844491
Int J Pharm. 2016 May 30;505(1-2):303-18
pubmed: 27050865
Methods. 2005 Feb;35(2):117-25
pubmed: 15649838
Br J Nutr. 2017 Jan;117(1):93-107
pubmed: 28102115
Food Res Int. 2018 Jan;103:462-467
pubmed: 29389636
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;103(16):6463-6472
pubmed: 31267231
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 06;24(7):
pubmed: 37047813
Front Microbiol. 2016 Mar 01;7:244
pubmed: 26973622
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jun 13;17(6):
pubmed: 27304953
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jul;104(7):7415-7425
pubmed: 33814147
Microb Pathog. 2019 Jan;126:212-217
pubmed: 30423346
Microorganisms. 2016 Sep 20;4(3):
pubmed: 27681930
Arch Microbiol. 2015 Mar;197(2):155-64
pubmed: 25212764
Food Microbiol. 2018 Feb;69:212-218
pubmed: 28941904
J Microbiol. 2016 Jul;54(7):510-9
pubmed: 27350617
Cytokine. 2023 Aug;168:156232
pubmed: 37224578
Future Microbiol. 2018 Dec;13:1731-1743
pubmed: 30526068
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 30;8(1):17485
pubmed: 30504833
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 May;33(3):1491-1498
pubmed: 33040631
J Microbiol. 2013 Oct;51(5):584-9
pubmed: 24037652
Gut Microbes. 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2149214
pubmed: 36469568
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018 Dec;10(4):717-727
pubmed: 28853009
Foods. 2022 Aug 04;11(15):
pubmed: 35954096
Caspian J Intern Med. 2022 Fall;13(4):713-720
pubmed: 36420328
ACS Synth Biol. 2020 Feb 21;9(2):356-367
pubmed: 31909976
Biomaterials. 2019 Dec;225:119521
pubmed: 31600674