Repeat surgical interventions following "definitive" instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: a 30-year update.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Complications
Definitive fusion
Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis
Reoperation
Journal
Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Aug 2023
12 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
14
04
2023
accepted:
22
07
2023
medline:
13
8
2023
pubmed:
13
8
2023
entrez:
12
8
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Although spinal fusion (SF) is considered "definitive" treatment in juvenile/adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (JIS/AIS), complications requiring reoperation continue to occur. The purpose of this study was to characterize the evolving rates of reoperation following SF in JIS/AIS. Single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent SF for JIS/AIS as their index surgical treatment between 2013 and 2019. Patient data were collected to identify complications requiring reoperation and factors associated with reoperation. Complication rates from 2013 to 2019 were compared to patients from 1988 to 2012 at the same institution. This study analyzed 934 patients (81.7% female, mean age at surgery 14.5 ± 2.1). Thirty-eight patients (4.1%) required a total of 47 reoperations, a > 50% decrease in overall complication rate from the 2008-2012 population (4.1% vs 9.6%, respectively, p < 0.001). The decrease stemmed mainly from decreases in rates of infection (1.1% vs 4.1%, p < 0.001) and symptomatic implants (0.4% vs 2.1%, p = 0.004). There were, however, non-significant increases in implant failures (0.6% vs 0.2%, p = 0.4367) and pseudoarthrosis (1.0% vs 0.4%, p = 0.5202). Both of these complications were associated with patients with a higher mean weight (implant failure: 70.4 kg ± 21.1 vs 56.1 kg ± 14.9, p = 0.002; pseudoarthrosis: 85.8 kg ± 27.9 vs 55.9 ± 14.5, p = 0.001). Reoperation following SF for JIS/AIS has decreased over the past 7 years when compared to 25 years of historical controls. The changing landscape of reoperation demands further research into the risk factors for those reoperations that have become more common.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37572225
doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00742-6
pii: 10.1007/s43390-023-00742-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
Références
Lonstein JE (2006) Scoliosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:248–259
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000198725.54891.73
pubmed: 16462448
Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC (2010) Analysis of instrumentation/fusion survivorship without reoperation after primary posterior multiple anchor instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 10:5–15
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.460
pubmed: 19822458
Campos M, Dolan L, Weinstein S (2012) Unanticipated revision surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37:1048–1053
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823ced6f
pubmed: 22037531
Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Schootman M (2009) Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 34:2191–2197
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3515a
pubmed: 19752705
Mignemi M, Tran D, Ramo B, Richards BS (2018) Repeat surgical interventions following “definitive” instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: 25-year update. Spine Deform 6:409–416
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.12.006
pubmed: 29886912
Ramo BA, Richards BS (2012) Repeat surgical interventions following “definitive” instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: five-year update on a previously published cohort. Spine 37:1211
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b6b05
pubmed: 22310095
Richards BS, Hasley BP, Casey VF (2006) Repeat surgical interventions following “definitive” instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:3018
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000249553.22138.58
pubmed: 17172999
Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Buchowski JM, Cheh G, Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH (2008) Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs: minimum three-year follow-up of one hundred fourteen cases. Spine 33:1598–1604
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178872a
pubmed: 18552676
Sanders AE, Andras LM, Sousa T, Kissinger C, Cucchiaro G, Skaggs DL (2017) Accelerated discharge protocol for posterior spinal fusion patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis decreases hospital postoperative charges 22. Spine 42:92–97
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001666
pubmed: 28072636
For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) C Procedure Associated Module: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event: Centers for Disease Control
Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, Fricke O, Franklin J, Schönau E, Eysel P (2013) Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 22:2360–2371
doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2693-9
pubmed: 23443679
pmcid: 3886494
Samdani AF, Belin EJ, Bennett JT, Pahys JM, Marks MC, Miyanji F, Shufflebarger HL, Lonner BS, Newton PO, Betz RR, Cahill PJ (2013) Unplanned return to the operating room in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: are we doing better with pedicle screws? Spine 38:1842–1847
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a42a99
pubmed: 23873241
Chen Z, Mont MA (2023) The utility of chlorhexidine cloth use for the prevention of surgical site infections in total hip arthroplasty and surgical as well as basic science applications: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Orthop Clin 54:7–22
Bakhsheshian J, Dahdaleh NS, Lam SK, Savage JW, Smith ZA (2015) The use of vancomycin powder in modern spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. World Neurosurg 83:816–823
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.033
pubmed: 25535069
McDonald TC, Heffernan MJ, Ramo B, Haber L, Sheffer B, Murphy J, Murphy R, Fletcher N, Coyne K, Lubicky J, Bumpass DB, Crawford C 3rd, Carreon L, Toner S, Stafford WH, Poppino K, Adams T, Song BM, Gidwani S, Taillac H, Cornaghie M, Sukkarieh H, Wright PB, Conklin M, Gilbert S, Thimothee J, Bhanat E, Brooks JT, Pediatric Orthopaedic Obesity Research Consortium (2021) Surgical outcomes of obese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from endemic areas of obesity in the United States. J Pediatr Orthop 41:e865–e870
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001958
pubmed: 34469396
De la Garza RR, Nakhla J, Nasser R, Schulz JF, Purvis TE, Sciubba DM, Kinon MD, Yassari R (2017) Effect of body mass index on surgical outcomes after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 43:E5
doi: 10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17342
Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G (2006) Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine 31:2329–2336
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000238968.82799.d9
pubmed: 16985461
Gupta A, Das K, Bansal K, Chhabra HS, Arora M (2021) Should implant breakage be always considered as implant “failure” in spine surgery: analysis of two cases and literature review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15233
doi: 10.7759/cureus.15233
pubmed: 35106192
pmcid: 8786563
Liu C, Zhang Z, Ma Y, Liang T, Yu C, Lu Z, Xu G, Wang Z, Chen J, Jiang J (2021) Predicting the failure risk of internal fixation devices in Chinese patients undergoing spinal internal fixation surgery: development and assessment of a new predictive nomogram. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8840107
doi: 10.1155/2021/8840107
pubmed: 35047627
pmcid: 8741362
Ghezelbash F, Shirazi-Adl A, Plamondon A, Arjmand N, Parnianpour M (2017) Obesity and obesity shape markedly influence spine biomechanics: a subject-specific risk assessment model. Ann Biomed Eng 45:2373–2382
doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1868-7
pubmed: 28608245
Sanyaolu A, Okorie C, Qi X, Locke J, Rehman S (2019) Childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: A public health concern. Glob Pediatr Health 6:2333794X19891305
pubmed: 31832491
pmcid: 6887808
Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, Rohmiller M, Marks MC, Bastrom T (2009) Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors. Spine 34:2147–2150
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181adb35d
pubmed: 19752700
Tsirikos AI, Subramanian AS (2012) Posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B:1670–1677
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.29403
Qadir I, Shah A, Alam SR, Hussain H, Akram R, Aziz A (2020) Impact of metal density on deformity correction in posterior fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 52:44–47
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.011
pubmed: 32211188
Shen M, Jiang H, Luo M, Wang W, Li N, Wang L, Xia L (2017) Comparison of low density and high density pedicle screw instrumentation in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:336
doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1695-x
pubmed: 28768503
pmcid: 5541645
Skalak TJ, Gagnier J, Caird MS, Farley FA, Li Y (2021) Higher pedicle screw density does not improve curve correction in Lenke 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Surg Res 16:276
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02415-4
pubmed: 33882975
pmcid: 8061215