Economic and environmental assessment of U.S. broiler production: opportunities to improve sustainability.

broiler production life cycle assessment scenario analysis sustainability techno-economic analysis

Journal

Poultry science
ISSN: 1525-3171
Titre abrégé: Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 02 03 2023
revised: 12 06 2023
accepted: 16 06 2023
medline: 27 9 2023
pubmed: 13 8 2023
entrez: 12 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The United States is the largest broiler producer in the world, and Americans consume about 45 kg of chicken per capita per year, which generates substantial economic and environmental footprints. We conduct techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (TEA/LCA) to evaluate the sustainability performance of the U.S. broiler industry and quantify the cost, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy, water, land, fertilizer, and respiratory impacts of 7 broiler production scenarios for a contract Grower, Integrator, and Combined control volume. The assessment is a farm-gate to farm-gate analysis that includes capital cost of chicken houses, labor, chicks brought into the farm, feeds, on-site fuels, and on-site emissions. We found that economics for the Integrator are profitable and dominated by the cost of corn and soybean meal feeds, payments to the Grower, and revenue from live broilers. Additionally, we found that economics for the Grower generate modest return on investment (ROI) largely based on the cost of houses and labor when compared to contract revenue from the Integrator. Environmental impacts for GHG, energy, and respiratory effects are primarily associated with upstream feed production (roughly 65%-80% of total impacts) and on-site fuel consumption (∼20%-35% of total impacts), while those for water, land, and eutrophication are almost entirely attributable to upstream feed production (litter spreading has a low economic allocation factor). Tradeoffs among sustainability metrics are further explored with a sensitivity analysis and by evaluating cost/environmental benefit scenarios.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37572620
pii: S0032-5791(23)00406-6
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102887
pmc: PMC10428061
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Greenhouse Gases 0
Water 059QF0KO0R

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102887

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Colin M Beal (CM)

B&D Engineering and Consulting LLC, Lander, WY 82520, USA; University of Hawaii at Hilo, Pacific Aquaculture & Coastal Resources Center, College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Natural Resource Management, Hilo, HI 95720, USA. Electronic address: info@tea-lca.com.

David M Robinson (DM)

B&D Engineering and Consulting LLC, Lander, WY 82520, USA.

Jack Smith (J)

B&D Engineering and Consulting LLC, Lander, WY 82520, USA.

Léda Gerber Van Doren (L)

B&D Engineering and Consulting LLC, Lander, WY 82520, USA.

George T Tabler (GT)

University of Tennessee, Animal Science Department, Middle Tennessee AgResearch and Education Center, Spring Hill, TN 37174, USA.

Samuel J Rochell (SJ)

Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

Michael T Kidd (MT)

Poultry Science Department, University of Arkansas, POSC O-114, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Walter G Bottje (WG)

Poultry Science Department, University of Arkansas, POSC O-114, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Xingen Lei (X)

Animal Science Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH