Economic and environmental assessment of U.S. broiler production: opportunities to improve sustainability.
broiler production
life cycle assessment
scenario analysis
sustainability
techno-economic analysis
Journal
Poultry science
ISSN: 1525-3171
Titre abrégé: Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
02
03
2023
revised:
12
06
2023
accepted:
16
06
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
13
8
2023
entrez:
12
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The United States is the largest broiler producer in the world, and Americans consume about 45 kg of chicken per capita per year, which generates substantial economic and environmental footprints. We conduct techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (TEA/LCA) to evaluate the sustainability performance of the U.S. broiler industry and quantify the cost, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy, water, land, fertilizer, and respiratory impacts of 7 broiler production scenarios for a contract Grower, Integrator, and Combined control volume. The assessment is a farm-gate to farm-gate analysis that includes capital cost of chicken houses, labor, chicks brought into the farm, feeds, on-site fuels, and on-site emissions. We found that economics for the Integrator are profitable and dominated by the cost of corn and soybean meal feeds, payments to the Grower, and revenue from live broilers. Additionally, we found that economics for the Grower generate modest return on investment (ROI) largely based on the cost of houses and labor when compared to contract revenue from the Integrator. Environmental impacts for GHG, energy, and respiratory effects are primarily associated with upstream feed production (roughly 65%-80% of total impacts) and on-site fuel consumption (∼20%-35% of total impacts), while those for water, land, and eutrophication are almost entirely attributable to upstream feed production (litter spreading has a low economic allocation factor). Tradeoffs among sustainability metrics are further explored with a sensitivity analysis and by evaluating cost/environmental benefit scenarios.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37572620
pii: S0032-5791(23)00406-6
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102887
pmc: PMC10428061
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Greenhouse Gases
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102887Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.