Difference in the risk of discrimination on psychological distress experienced by early wave infected and late wave infected COVID-19 survivors in Japan.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 08 2023
12 08 2023
Historique:
received:
08
06
2023
accepted:
09
08
2023
medline:
16
8
2023
pubmed:
13
8
2023
entrez:
12
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The psychological distress experienced by coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) survivors after recovery from the illness is amplified by discrimination endured because of their infection status. However, the difference in the risk of facing discrimination and risk of experiencing psychological distress in the early and late waves of the COVID-19 pandemic remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the risk of facing discrimination because of infection status was lower in the early or late waves and whether risk of discrimination on psychological distress was more serious in later, rather than earlier waves. We conducted two online surveys to collect data from survivors divided into two groups. The participants with scores of five or more on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale were identified as having experienced psychological distress. The participants were identified as having experienced discrimination based on infection status if they had endured being blamed, some type of discrimination, or having themselves or their families maligned. The timing of infection was split into infected during early waves of the pandemic for 2021 participants and infected during later waves of the pandemic for 2022 participants. Modified Poisson regression analyses were performed using experiences of discrimination as criteria and timing of infection as predictors. Modified Poisson regression analyses were further performed using the presence of psychological distress as a criteria and experiences of discrimination and timing of infection as the criteria, in addition to interaction effect of these es. The data of 6010 participants who were infected in early waves and 5344 participants who were infected in later waves were analyzed. The risks of being blamed, some forms of discrimination, and participants and their families being maligned were significantly lower in the group who were infected in later waves than those infected in earlier waves. Experiences of discrimination were highly associated with psychological distress in those infected in later waves than those infected in earlier waves, while only being blamed showed a significant association. Risk of discrimination was found to be lower in those infected in later waves, whereas risk of discrimination on psychological distress was shown to be more serious in those infected in later waves. Therefore, we submit that it is more important to support COVID-19 survivors who face discrimination, than it is to attempt to decrease the current discriminatory climate caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37573383
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40345-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-40345-9
pmc: PMC10423270
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13139Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276608
pubmed: 36383607
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;19(6):
pubmed: 35329171
Eur J Psychiatry. 2023 Jan-Mar;37(1):24-35
pubmed: 36061855
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 21;11:1111900
pubmed: 37026126
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):704-711
pubmed: 36482134
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1461-1467
pubmed: 35614233
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 30;13(1):7363
pubmed: 36450749
Psychiatry J. 2014;2014:694565
pubmed: 24967300
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:40-48
pubmed: 32298802
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 23;12(1):22218
pubmed: 36564428
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):3285-3292
pubmed: 32875509
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 24;12(8):e059472
pubmed: 36002206
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 11;12(1):6039
pubmed: 35411017
J Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar 15;434:120162
pubmed: 35121209
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 4;18(1):e0279180
pubmed: 36598901
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8
pubmed: 17947786
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):488-95
pubmed: 19525685
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Oct;53:102222
pubmed: 32570096
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(3):152-8
pubmed: 18763695
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246824
pubmed: 33571297
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;10:949403
pubmed: 36311624
Lancet. 2023 Mar 11;401(10379):795
pubmed: 36906338
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:379-391
pubmed: 32861839
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 2;192(6):856-860
pubmed: 36843016
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):
pubmed: 36430126
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 15;12(1):284
pubmed: 35840584
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:682860
pubmed: 34248784
J Public Health Res. 2022 Sep 7;11(3):22799036221115780
pubmed: 36090024
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 02;10(2):
pubmed: 35206906
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 6;10:e14092
pubmed: 36221262
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):921-48
pubmed: 24547896
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0258042
pubmed: 34597354
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115226
pubmed: 35932537
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 16;63(1):e97
pubmed: 33190666
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 19;22(1):798
pubmed: 36536342
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;9(10):815-827
pubmed: 35987197
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;68(1):55-63
pubmed: 33274660
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):943-55
pubmed: 10821200
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 05;13:915617
pubmed: 35865307
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):423-433
pubmed: 35668159
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76
pubmed: 12214795