Value Proposition of FDA-Approved Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Neuroimaging.

AI Artificial intelligence FDA machine learning neuroimaging neuroradiology value proposition

Journal

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 25 04 2023
revised: 21 06 2023
accepted: 30 06 2023
pubmed: 14 8 2023
medline: 14 8 2023
entrez: 13 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The number of FDA-cleared artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for neuroimaging has grown in the past decade. The adoption of these algorithms into clinical practice depends largely on whether this technology provides value in the clinical setting. The objective of this study was to analyze trends in FDA-cleared AI algorithms for neuroimaging and understand their value proposition as advertised by the AI developers and vendors. A list of AI algorithms cleared by the FDA for neuroimaging between May 2008 and August 2022 was extracted from the ACR Data Science Institute AI Central database. Product information for each device was collected from the database. For each device, information on the advertised value as presented on the developer's website was collected. A total of 59 AI neuroimaging algorithms were cleared by the FDA between May 2008 and August 2022. Most of these algorithms (24 of 59) were compatible with noncontrast CT, 21 with MRI, 9 with CT perfusion, 8 with CT angiography, 3 with MR perfusion, and 2 with PET. Six algorithms were compatible with multiple imaging techniques. Of the 59 algorithms, websites were located that discussed the product value for 55 algorithms. The most widely advertised value proposition was improved quality of care (38 of 55 [69.1%]). A total of 24 algorithms (43.6%) proposed saving user time, 9 (15.7%) advertised decreased costs, and 6 (10.9%) described increased revenue. Product websites for 26 algorithms (43.6%) showed user testimonials advertising the value of the technology. The results of this study indicate a wide range of value propositions advertised by developers and vendors of AI algorithms for neuroimaging. Most vendors advertised that their products would improve patient care. Further research is necessary to determine whether the value claimed by developers is actually demonstrated in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37574094
pii: S1546-1440(23)00586-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.06.034
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Suryansh Bajaj (S)

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Mihir Khunte (M)

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Nagaraj S Moily (NS)

Visage Imaging, San Diego, California.

Seyedmehdi Payabvash (S)

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Max Wintermark (M)

Chair, Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Dheeraj Gandhi (D)

Director, Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Ajay Malhotra (A)

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: ajay.malhotra@yale.edu.

Classifications MeSH