Surgical Approach for RSA has Little or no Influence on Scapular Inclination and Glenoid Baseplate Tilt Relative to the Horizontal.

angles baseplate glenoid reverse shoulder arthroplasty rotation scapula tilt

Journal

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty
ISSN: 2471-5492
Titre abrégé: J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763114

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 10 05 2023
revised: 11 07 2023
accepted: 18 07 2023
pubmed: 14 8 2023
medline: 14 8 2023
entrez: 14 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Determine whether reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) glenoid baseplate tilt is influenced by surgical approach and/or associated with functional scores. In total, 501 shoulders (483 patients) who underwent RSA, by anterosuperior (AS, n = 88) or deltopectoral (DP, n = 413) approach. Preoperative and immediate postoperative anteroposterior and scapular Y-view radiographs were used to measure: Inclination of the supraspinatus fossa's floor relative to the horizontal (Sigma angle), inclination of the glenoid fossa line (or glenoid baseplate surface) relative to the horizontal (beta-h angle) or to the supraspinatus fossa's floor (beta-s angle). Sigma and beta-h were significantly greater for shoulders operated by DP approach, both preoperatively ( Beta-s was slightly but significantly greater for shoulders operated by DP approach, while beta-h and sigma depended primarily on preoperative scapular inclination and glenoid tilt, rather than on surgical approach. At a minimum of 2 years following RSA, neither constant scores nor net improvements thereof were significantly associated with any of the angles. IV, case series.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37575313
doi: 10.1177/24715492231192227
pii: 10.1177_24715492231192227
pmc: PMC10422891
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

24715492231192227

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Thomas Cuinet (T)

Centre Chirurgical Émile-Gallé, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
SoFEC-French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.

Cécile Nérot (C)

SoFEC-French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.
Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.

Arnaud Godenèche (A)

SoFEC-French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.
Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Santé, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.

Lisa Peduzzi (L)

Centre Chirurgical Émile-Gallé, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
SoFEC-French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.
ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland.
SoFEC-French Shoulder and Elbow Society, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH