Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using machine learning algorithms in a Kenyan population.
LMICs
machine learning
maternal health
postpartum hemorrhage
pregnancy
risk prediction
Journal
Frontiers in global women's health
ISSN: 2673-5059
Titre abrégé: Front Glob Womens Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101776281
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
08
02
2023
accepted:
10
07
2023
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
14
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a significant cause of maternal mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It is essential to develop effective prediction models to identify women at risk of PPH and implement appropriate interventions to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. This study aims to predict the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage using machine learning models based on antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal visit data obtained from the Kenya Antenatal and Postnatal Care Research Collective cohort. Four machine learning models - logistic regression, naïve Bayes, decision tree, and random forest - were constructed using 67% training data (1,056/1,576). The training data was further split into 67% for model building and 33% cross validation. Once the models are built, the remaining 33% (520/1,576) independent test data was used for external validation to confirm the models' performance. Models were fine-tuned using feature selection through extra tree classifier technique. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The naïve Bayes model performed best with 0.95 accuracy, 0.97 specificity, and 0.76 AUC. Seven factors (anemia, limited prenatal care, hemoglobin concentrations, signs of pallor at intrapartum, intrapartum systolic blood pressure, intrapartum diastolic blood pressure, and intrapartum respiratory rate) were associated with PPH prediction in Kenyan population. This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models in predicting PPH in the Kenyan population. Future studies with larger datasets and more PPH cases should be conducted to improve prediction performance of machine learning model. Such prediction algorithms would immensely help to construct a personalized obstetric path for each pregnant patient, improve resource allocation, and reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37575959
doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1161157
pmc: PMC10419202
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1161157Informations de copyright
© 2023 Shah, Saxena, Rani, Nelaturi, Gill, Tippett Barr, Were, Khagayi, Ouma, Akelo, Norwitz, Ramakrishnan, Onyango and Teltumbade.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SS, SR and NN are employees of CognitiveCare Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary. SYS, SG and MT are founding team members and employees of CognitiveCare Inc. CognitiveCare Inc. has a patent pending for a maternal and infant health intelligence and cognitive insight (MIHIC) system and score to predict the risk of maternal, fetal and infant morbidity and mortality. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
BMJ. 2009 Jun 04;338:b606
pubmed: 19502216
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;49(11):1225-31
pubmed: 8892489
EBioMedicine. 2019 Dec;50:355-365
pubmed: 31767539
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):297-307
pubmed: 30682365
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 18;8(11):e80582
pubmed: 24260426
J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):593-600
pubmed: 28466102
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):77
pubmed: 29580207
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Lancet. 2006 Sep 30;368(9542):1189-200
pubmed: 17011946
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):1921-1934
pubmed: 33040151
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 12;29(2):296-305
pubmed: 34405866
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Aug 1;54(2):203-208
pubmed: 29741602
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;22(6):999-1012
pubmed: 18819848
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Feb 17;3(2):100185
pubmed: 36935935
BJOG. 2017 Apr;124(5):e106-e149
pubmed: 27981719
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):46-53
pubmed: 32575159
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Jun;90(6):615-20
pubmed: 21370999
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 18;24(7):e34108
pubmed: 35849436
Womens Health (Lond). 2017 Aug;13(2):34-40
pubmed: 28681676
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;158 Suppl 1:14-22
pubmed: 35762810
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e168-e186
pubmed: 28937571
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074
pubmed: 16581405
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;35(2):163-169
pubmed: 28847038