Patient-reported impact of symptoms in lung cancer (PRISM-LC).
Lung cancer (LC)
cross-sectional study
patient-reported
qualitative research
quality of life
Journal
Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jul 2023
31 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
23
11
2022
accepted:
30
05
2023
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
14
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Individuals with lung cancer (LC) face a variety of symptoms that significantly impact their lives. We use extensive patient input to determine the relative importance and prevalence of these symptoms and identify which demographic features are associated with a higher level of disease burden. We performed semi-structured qualitative interviews with participants with LC to identify potentially important symptoms. We then conducted a cross-sectional study, in which participants rated the relative importance of 162 individual symptoms covering 14 symptomatic themes. Participant responses were analyzed by age, sex, disability status, disease duration, LC stage, type of treatment received, and smoking history, among other categories. Our cross-sectional study had 139 participants with LC. The most prevalent symptomatic themes reported by this population were fatigue (85.5%), impaired sleep and daytime sleepiness (73.5%), and emotional issues (73.0%). The symptomatic themes that had the greatest average impact (on a scale of 0 to 4, with 4 being the most impactful) were social role dissatisfaction (1.67), inability to do activities (1.64), and fatigue (1.60). Disability status had the strongest association with symptomatic theme prevalence. LC stage (stage IV), receipt of therapy, and smoking experience were also associated with higher frequency of symptomatic themes. Individuals with LC face diverse and disease-specific symptoms that affect their daily lives. Patient insight on the prevalence and relative importance of these symptoms is invaluable to advance meaningful therapeutic interventions.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Individuals with lung cancer (LC) face a variety of symptoms that significantly impact their lives. We use extensive patient input to determine the relative importance and prevalence of these symptoms and identify which demographic features are associated with a higher level of disease burden.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We performed semi-structured qualitative interviews with participants with LC to identify potentially important symptoms. We then conducted a cross-sectional study, in which participants rated the relative importance of 162 individual symptoms covering 14 symptomatic themes. Participant responses were analyzed by age, sex, disability status, disease duration, LC stage, type of treatment received, and smoking history, among other categories.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Our cross-sectional study had 139 participants with LC. The most prevalent symptomatic themes reported by this population were fatigue (85.5%), impaired sleep and daytime sleepiness (73.5%), and emotional issues (73.0%). The symptomatic themes that had the greatest average impact (on a scale of 0 to 4, with 4 being the most impactful) were social role dissatisfaction (1.67), inability to do activities (1.64), and fatigue (1.60). Disability status had the strongest association with symptomatic theme prevalence. LC stage (stage IV), receipt of therapy, and smoking experience were also associated with higher frequency of symptomatic themes.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Individuals with LC face diverse and disease-specific symptoms that affect their daily lives. Patient insight on the prevalence and relative importance of these symptoms is invaluable to advance meaningful therapeutic interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37577309
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-831
pii: tlcr-12-07-1391
pmc: PMC10413040
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1391-1413Informations de copyright
2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form. (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-22-831/coif). CH is the recipient of the grant award from URVentures that funded this research. He receives royalties for the use of multiple disease specific instruments. He has provided consultation to Biogen Idec, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, aTyr Pharma, AMO Pharma, Acceleron Pharma, Cytokinetics, Expansion Therapeutics, Harmony Biosciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharmaceuticals, AveXis, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, IRIS Medicine, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Scholar Rock, Avidity Biosciences, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, SwanBio Therapeutics, and the Marigold Foundation. He receives grant support from the Department of Defense, Duchenne UK, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Swan Bio Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Friedreich’s Ataxia Research Alliance, Cure Spinal Muscular Atrophy, and the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association. He is the director of the University of Rochester’s Center for Health + Technology. JCK has provided consultation/participated on advisory boards for Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and EQRX. She has received support from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Lung Ambition Alliance, Mirati, Novartis, and Takeda, paid to GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer. She is the PI on a research project unrelated to this work, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Genentech and paid to GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer. Jacinta Wiens is now an employee of Merck but was employed at GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer during her participation on this study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Psychooncology. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-28
pubmed: 11180574
Neurology. 2018 Sep 25;91(13):e1206-e1214
pubmed: 30143566
Lung Cancer. 2009 Dec;66(3):386-92
pubmed: 19304339
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019 Dec 17;4:61
pubmed: 31871778
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Feb 29;9:1023-8
pubmed: 27013895
Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Nov;24(11):1018-23
pubmed: 25092060
Neurology. 2015 Dec 15;85(24):2136-46
pubmed: 26581301
Lung Cancer. 1995 Jun;12(3):199-220
pubmed: 7655830
Muscle Nerve. 2012 Dec;46(6):951-3
pubmed: 23225386
Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25(2):106-118
pubmed: 24713845
Cancer Nurs. 2000 Apr;23(2):82-90
pubmed: 10763278
Lung Cancer. 2013 Aug;81(2):288-93
pubmed: 23561304
BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):1275
pubmed: 30567516
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Mar-Apr;31(2):202-12
pubmed: 15017438
Lung Cancer. 2004 Mar;43(3):247-57
pubmed: 15165082
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 31;13(1):
pubmed: 33396286
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jan;22(1):181-7
pubmed: 24026981
Neurology. 2019 Sep 17;93(12):e1180-e1192
pubmed: 31409737
Cancer. 1991 Jun 15;67(12):3131-5
pubmed: 1710541
Neurology. 2012 Jul 24;79(4):348-57
pubmed: 22786587
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S149-S152
pubmed: 29782567
Lung Cancer. 2001 Feb-Mar;31(2-3):233-40
pubmed: 11165402
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):573-605
pubmed: 31989388
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012 Aug;29(5):379-87
pubmed: 22057209
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2013 Sep;15(1):19-23
pubmed: 23965405
Cell Cycle. 2017 Jul 18;16(14):1345-1349
pubmed: 28657421
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jan;57(1):40-44
pubmed: 28877556
Neurology. 2020 May 12;94(19):e2045-e2053
pubmed: 32193209
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb 20;40(6):611-625
pubmed: 34985916
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9
pubmed: 8445433
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Oct;15(10):1199-205
pubmed: 17431688