Identifying key policy objectives for strong primary care: a cross-sectional study.
health care reform
health policy
health priorities
primary care
questionnaire
stakeholder participation
Journal
Primary health care research & development
ISSN: 1477-1128
Titre abrégé: Prim Health Care Res Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897390
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 08 2023
14 08 2023
Historique:
medline:
15
8
2023
pubmed:
14
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to identify key policy objectives by investigating the perception of important stakeholders and affected professionals concerning relevance and feasibility of a successful primary care (PC) reform. Since 2013, the Austrian PC system has been undergoing a reform process to establish multiprofessional primary care units. The reforms have various defined objectives and lack clear priorities. After the definition and consensus-based selection of 12 policy objectives, a cross-sectional online survey on their relevance and feasibility was distributed via email and social media to PC and public health networks. The survey was conducted in the period from January to February 2020. Results were analyzed descriptively, and further, Pearson Chi-Square Test or Fisher's Exact Test was performed for group comparison regarding respondents' characteristics. Open-ended responses were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. In total, 169 questionnaires were completed. A total of 46.3% of the responders had more than 20 years of professional experience (female: 60.5%). A mandatory internship in general practice, vocational training for general practice, and a modern remuneration system were the three top-rated policy objectives regarding relevance. A mandatory internship in general practice, specialization in general practice, and coding of services and diagnosis were assessed as the most feasible objectives. The group comparisons regarding working field, years of professional experience, age, and sex did not show any meaningful results in the evaluation of relevance and feasibility. In the view of the study participants, easily obtainable objectives include adapting the duration and setting of internships for medical students, as well as mandatory vocational training for GP trainees. Further efforts are necessary to achieve complex objectives such as the adoption of a modern remuneration scheme and a comprehensive quality assurance program. Building capacity and creating team-oriented environments are also important aspects of a successful PC reform.
Sections du résumé
AIM
The aim of this study was to identify key policy objectives by investigating the perception of important stakeholders and affected professionals concerning relevance and feasibility of a successful primary care (PC) reform.
BACKGROUND
Since 2013, the Austrian PC system has been undergoing a reform process to establish multiprofessional primary care units. The reforms have various defined objectives and lack clear priorities.
METHODS
After the definition and consensus-based selection of 12 policy objectives, a cross-sectional online survey on their relevance and feasibility was distributed via email and social media to PC and public health networks. The survey was conducted in the period from January to February 2020. Results were analyzed descriptively, and further, Pearson Chi-Square Test or Fisher's Exact Test was performed for group comparison regarding respondents' characteristics. Open-ended responses were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
FINDINGS
In total, 169 questionnaires were completed. A total of 46.3% of the responders had more than 20 years of professional experience (female: 60.5%). A mandatory internship in general practice, vocational training for general practice, and a modern remuneration system were the three top-rated policy objectives regarding relevance. A mandatory internship in general practice, specialization in general practice, and coding of services and diagnosis were assessed as the most feasible objectives. The group comparisons regarding working field, years of professional experience, age, and sex did not show any meaningful results in the evaluation of relevance and feasibility.
DISCUSSION
In the view of the study participants, easily obtainable objectives include adapting the duration and setting of internships for medical students, as well as mandatory vocational training for GP trainees. Further efforts are necessary to achieve complex objectives such as the adoption of a modern remuneration scheme and a comprehensive quality assurance program. Building capacity and creating team-oriented environments are also important aspects of a successful PC reform.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37577950
pii: S1463423623000403
doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000403
pmc: PMC10466205
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e52Références
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81
pubmed: 20979612
Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):55-61
pubmed: 30539675
Health Policy. 2015 Dec;119(12):1576-83
pubmed: 26319096
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):766-72
pubmed: 20439859
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Mar;52(3):727-43
pubmed: 25577306
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):33
pubmed: 30683085
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Oct;66(651):e768-75
pubmed: 27578812
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Mar;29(1):28-38
pubmed: 21192758
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 22;17(1):163
pubmed: 27875994
Implement Sci. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):3
pubmed: 28057024
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):136-141
pubmed: 35666561
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):39-44
pubmed: 29168411
Health Syst Transit. 2018 Aug;20(3):1-254
pubmed: 30277215
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):1006
pubmed: 31881884
Dan Med J. 2016 Sep;63(9):
pubmed: 27585527
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e024957
pubmed: 31340955
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Feb;10(1):
pubmed: 33574115
J Glob Health. 2016 Dec;6(2):020403
pubmed: 27648254
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 27;9(2):e026048
pubmed: 30814114
BMC Nurs. 2019 Apr 02;18:14
pubmed: 30976197
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Apr;150-152:96-102
pubmed: 32139305
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Nov 16;16:168
pubmed: 26572224
Fam Pract. 2018 May 23;35(3):276-284
pubmed: 29069376
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Oct 20;12:115
pubmed: 22014310