Medical versus neurosurgical treatment in ICH patients: a single center experience.
Haemorrhage
ICH
Neurosurgery
Surgery
Therapy
Journal
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2023
14 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
27
06
2023
accepted:
07
08
2023
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
14
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The effect of surgical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains uncertain. We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study on supra-centimeter spontaneous ICH treated with either neurosurgical or conservative management. The baseline demographics and risk factors were correlated with in-hospital mortality and 3 and 6-month survival rates stratified by management. We included all patients with evidence of spontaneous ICH > 1 cm detected by CT and admitted between august 2020 and march 2021 to the "SMM" Hospital in Perugia. Onehundredandtwentytwo patients were included in the study, and 45% (n.55) were surgically treated. The mean age was 71.9 ± 15.3, and 61% (n.75) were males. Intra-hospital mortality ended up being 31% (n.38), 3 months-survival was 63% (n.77) and 6 months-survival was 60% (n.73). From the multivariate analysis of the surgical patients versus medical patient, we observed that the surgical patients were younger (67.5 ± 14.9 vs 75.5 ± 14.7 y; OR 0.87; Cl 95% 0.85-0.94; p 0.001), with greater ICH volume at the onset (61 ± 39.4 cc vs 51 ± 64 cc; OR 1.03; Cl 95% 1.005-1.07; p 0.05), more midline shift (7.61 ± 5.54 mm vs 4.09 ± 5.88 mm; OR 1.37; Cl 95% 1.045-1.79; p 0.023), and a higher ICH score (3 vs 2 mean ICH score; OR 21.12; Cl 95% 2.6-170.6; p 0.004). Intra-hospital mortality in the surgical group and in the conservative treatment group was respectively 33% vs 30%, 3 month-survival was 64% vs 63% and 6 month- survival were 60% in both groups. Our patient cohort shows no overall benefit from surgery over conservative treatment, but surgical patients were younger and had larger ICH volume.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The effect of surgical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains uncertain. We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study on supra-centimeter spontaneous ICH treated with either neurosurgical or conservative management. The baseline demographics and risk factors were correlated with in-hospital mortality and 3 and 6-month survival rates stratified by management.
METHODS
METHODS
We included all patients with evidence of spontaneous ICH > 1 cm detected by CT and admitted between august 2020 and march 2021 to the "SMM" Hospital in Perugia.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Onehundredandtwentytwo patients were included in the study, and 45% (n.55) were surgically treated. The mean age was 71.9 ± 15.3, and 61% (n.75) were males. Intra-hospital mortality ended up being 31% (n.38), 3 months-survival was 63% (n.77) and 6 months-survival was 60% (n.73). From the multivariate analysis of the surgical patients versus medical patient, we observed that the surgical patients were younger (67.5 ± 14.9 vs 75.5 ± 14.7 y; OR 0.87; Cl 95% 0.85-0.94; p 0.001), with greater ICH volume at the onset (61 ± 39.4 cc vs 51 ± 64 cc; OR 1.03; Cl 95% 1.005-1.07; p 0.05), more midline shift (7.61 ± 5.54 mm vs 4.09 ± 5.88 mm; OR 1.37; Cl 95% 1.045-1.79; p 0.023), and a higher ICH score (3 vs 2 mean ICH score; OR 21.12; Cl 95% 2.6-170.6; p 0.004). Intra-hospital mortality in the surgical group and in the conservative treatment group was respectively 33% vs 30%, 3 month-survival was 64% vs 63% and 6 month- survival were 60% in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our patient cohort shows no overall benefit from surgery over conservative treatment, but surgical patients were younger and had larger ICH volume.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37578629
doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07015-0
pii: 10.1007/s10072-023-07015-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA (2017) Global burden of stroke. Circ Res 120(3):439–448. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308413
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308413
pubmed: 28154096
Ali M et al (2009) Primary end-point times, functional outcome and adverse event profile after acute ischaemic stroke. Int J Stroke 4(6):432–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00348.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00348.x
pubmed: 19930052
Dhamoon MS et al (2009) Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke 40(8):2805–2811. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.549576
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.549576
pubmed: 19556535
pmcid: 2830874
Blanc-Labarre C et al (2018) Acute management of ischemic stroke in 2017. Rev Med Interne 39(6):408–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2017.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2017.07.006
pubmed: 28867531
Mendelow AD et al (2005) Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial. Lancet 365(9457):387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X
pubmed: 15680453
Vidale S, Bellocchi S, Taborelli A (2013) Surgery for cerebral haemorrhage–STICH II trial. Lancet 382(9902):1401–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62211-4
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62211-4
pubmed: 24243130
Schreuder F et al (2022) Identifying the conditions for cost-effective minimally invasive neurosurgery in spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Front Neurol 13:830614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.830614
Sondag L et al (2020) Neurosurgical intervention for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Ann Neurol 88(2):239–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25732
doi: 10.1002/ana.25732
pubmed: 32239722
pmcid: 7497162
Ali M et al (2023) Long-term functional independence after minimally invasive endoscopic intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. J Neurosurg 138(1):154–164. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.3.JNS22286
doi: 10.3171/2022.3.JNS22286
pubmed: 35561694
Hersh EH et al (2018) Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 18(6):34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0836-4
doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0836-4
pubmed: 29740726
Steiner T et al (2014) European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Stroke 9(7):840–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12309
doi: 10.1111/ijs.12309
pubmed: 25156220
Macellari F et al (2014) Neuroimaging in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 45(3):903–908. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003701
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003701
pubmed: 24425128
Kothari RU et al (1996) The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 27(8):1304–1305. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.8.1304
doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.8.1304
pubmed: 8711791
Jauch EC, Pineda JA, Hemphill JC (2015) Emergency neurological life support: intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 23(Suppl 2):S83-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0167-0
doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0167-0
pubmed: 26438461
Savio K et al (2013) Reliability of the modified rankin scale applied by telephone. Neurol Int 5(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.4081/ni.2013.e2
Fernando SM et al (2021) Short- and long-term health care resource utilization and costs following intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 97(6):e608–e618. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012355
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012355
pubmed: 34108269
Fernando SM et al (2021) Intracerebral hemorrhage incidence, mortality, and association with oral anticoagulation use: a population study. Stroke 52(5):1673–1681. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032550
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032550
pubmed: 33685222
D’Amore C et al (2013) Severity of acute intracerebral haemorrhage, elderly age and atrial fibrillation: independent predictors of poor outcome at three months. Eur J Intern Med 24(4):310–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2012.12.007
doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.12.007
pubmed: 23291004
Mosconi MG et al (2021) SMASH-U classification: a tool for aetiology-oriented management of patients with acute haemorrhagic stroke. Intern Emerg Med 16(1):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02330-2
doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02330-2
pubmed: 32266689
Langhorne P, Ramachandra S, C. Stroke Unit Trialists (2020) Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD000197. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub4
Hwang DY et al (2016) Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes. Neurology 86(2):126–133. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002266
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002266
pubmed: 26674335
pmcid: 4731687
Leasure A et al (2016) Treatment of Edema Associated With Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Neurol 18(2):9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-015-0392-z
doi: 10.1007/s11940-015-0392-z
pubmed: 26874842
Sembolini A et al (2020) Acute hematoma expansion after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: risk factors and impact on long-term prognosis. Neurol Sci 41(9):2503–2509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04356-y
doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04356-y
pubmed: 32215850