Exposure to automation explains religious declines.
artificial intelligence
automation
cultural evolution
religion
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 08 2023
22 08 2023
Historique:
medline:
16
8
2023
pubmed:
14
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The global decline of religiosity represents one of the most significant societal shifts in recent history. After millennia of near-universal religious identification, the world is experiencing a regionally uneven trend toward secularization. We propose an explanation of this decline, which claims that automation-the development of robots and artificial intelligence (AI)-can partly explain modern religious declines. We build four unique datasets composed of more than 3 million individuals which show that robotics and AI exposure is linked to 21st-century religious declines across nations, metropolitan regions, and individual people. Key results hold controlling for other technological developments (e.g., electricity grid access and telecommunications development), socioeconomic indicators (e.g., wealth, residential mobility, and demographics), and factors implicated in previous theories of religious decline (e.g., individual choice norms). An experiment also supports our hypotheses. Our findings partly explain contemporary trends in religious decline and foreshadow where religiosity may wane in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37579178
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2304748120
pmc: PMC10450436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2304748120Références
Hum Nat. 2021 Sep;32(3):622-651
pubmed: 34463944
Cogn Sci. 2008 Jun;32(4):607-42
pubmed: 21635349
Child Dev. 2012 May-Jun;83(3):779-93
pubmed: 22417318
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Jan;18(174):20200898
pubmed: 33468022
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967 Apr;5(4):432-43
pubmed: 6051769
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e49648
pubmed: 23227147
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):4820-5
pubmed: 24639494
Am Psychol. 2023 Jan;78(1):50-61
pubmed: 35201784
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Oct;106(10):1557-1572
pubmed: 33030919
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104290
pubmed: 32302789
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;20(1):27-48
pubmed: 25673322
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38
pubmed: 17563168
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):59-64
pubmed: 30356211
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 May;151(5):1199-1218
pubmed: 34928686
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104398
pubmed: 32711182
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510
pubmed: 29777175
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1568-78
pubmed: 25664470
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:21-34
pubmed: 30107256
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Dec;117(6):1203-1230
pubmed: 30730156
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):129-135
pubmed: 30944450
Am Psychol. 2021 Sep;76(6):838-850
pubmed: 34914425
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Dec;192:541-583
pubmed: 34744223
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 22;120(34):e2304748120
pubmed: 37579178
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0121950
pubmed: 25793746