From Local Action to Global Policy: A Comparative Policy Content Analysis of National Policies to Address Musculoskeletal Health to Inform Global Policy Development.
Global Policy
Musculoskeletal Health
Policy Content Analysis
Policy Learning
Journal
International journal of health policy and management
ISSN: 2322-5939
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Policy Manag
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101619905
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
20
12
2021
accepted:
26
11
2022
medline:
16
8
2023
pubmed:
14
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Global policy to guide action on musculoskeletal (MSK) health is in a nascent phase. Lagging behind other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) there is currently little global policy to assist governments to develop national approaches to MSK health. Considering the importance of comparison and learning for global policy development, we aimed to perform a comparative analysis of national MSK policies to identify areas of innovation and draw common themes and principles that could guide MSK health policy. Multi-modal search strategy incorporating a systematic online search targeted at the 30 most populated nations; a call to networked experts; a specified question in a related eDelphi questionnaire; and snowballing methods. Extracted data were organised using an The search yielded 165 documents with 41 retained after removal of duplicates and exclusions. Only three documents were comprehensive national strategies addressing MSK health. The most common conditions addressed in the documents were pain (non-cancer), low back pain, occupational health, inflammatory conditions, and osteoarthritis. Across eight categories, we derived 47 sub-themes with transferable principles that could guide global policy for: service delivery; workforce; medicines and technologies; financing; data and information systems; leadership and governance; citizens, consumers and communities; and research and innovation. There are few examples of national strategic policy to address MSK health; however, many countries are moving towards this by documenting the burden of disease and developing policies for MSK services. This review found a breadth of principles that can add to this existing work and may be adopted to develop comprehensive system-wide MSK health approaches at national and global levels.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Global policy to guide action on musculoskeletal (MSK) health is in a nascent phase. Lagging behind other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) there is currently little global policy to assist governments to develop national approaches to MSK health. Considering the importance of comparison and learning for global policy development, we aimed to perform a comparative analysis of national MSK policies to identify areas of innovation and draw common themes and principles that could guide MSK health policy.
METHODS
Multi-modal search strategy incorporating a systematic online search targeted at the 30 most populated nations; a call to networked experts; a specified question in a related eDelphi questionnaire; and snowballing methods. Extracted data were organised using an
RESULTS
The search yielded 165 documents with 41 retained after removal of duplicates and exclusions. Only three documents were comprehensive national strategies addressing MSK health. The most common conditions addressed in the documents were pain (non-cancer), low back pain, occupational health, inflammatory conditions, and osteoarthritis. Across eight categories, we derived 47 sub-themes with transferable principles that could guide global policy for: service delivery; workforce; medicines and technologies; financing; data and information systems; leadership and governance; citizens, consumers and communities; and research and innovation.
CONCLUSION
There are few examples of national strategic policy to address MSK health; however, many countries are moving towards this by documenting the burden of disease and developing policies for MSK services. This review found a breadth of principles that can add to this existing work and may be adopted to develop comprehensive system-wide MSK health approaches at national and global levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37579444
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7031
pii: 7031
pmc: PMC10125103
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7031Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Références
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017
pubmed: 33275908
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1135-1159
pubmed: 33069324
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):129-149
pubmed: 35876078
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019 Sep 20;3(2):rkz036
pubmed: 31660475
Pain. 2018 Sep;159 Suppl 1:S43-S48
pubmed: 30113946
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 May 1;96(5):366-368
pubmed: 29875522
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;34(5):101549
pubmed: 32713802
Pain. 2020 Oct;161(10):2229-2235
pubmed: 32694381
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):274-80
pubmed: 22345267
Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Jul 09;6:7
pubmed: 18613961
Glob Public Health. 2020 Jun;15(6):805-817
pubmed: 32013785
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;69(4):567-577
pubmed: 27273891
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e4-e5
pubmed: 31813789
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020317
pubmed: 33274068
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):35-40
pubmed: 30495997
Global Health. 2020 Nov 11;16(1):109
pubmed: 33176810
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 11;4(5):e001806
pubmed: 31565419
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Oct 2;60(10):4874-4879
pubmed: 33493285
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Mar 1;98(3):222-223
pubmed: 32132758
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 May 28;6(1):24
pubmed: 34256865
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5):
pubmed: 34001521
Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1370-9
pubmed: 17933652
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jun 1;34(5):370-383
pubmed: 31199439
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222
pubmed: 33069326