Maternal and neonatal factors associated with cesarean delivery in a cohort of pregnancies complicated by prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease.


Journal

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
ISSN: 1476-5543
Titre abrégé: J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501884

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 06 02 2023
accepted: 31 07 2023
revised: 11 06 2023
medline: 15 8 2023
pubmed: 15 8 2023
entrez: 14 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease (CHD) have increased cesarean delivery (CD) rates, with no outcome improvement. We aim to examine indications for delivery, indications for CD and risk factors associated with CD. Retrospective cohort of 322 singleton pregnancies prenatally diagnosed with moderate to severe CHD. We compared maternal and fetal factors correlated with delivery route. CD rate was 46% (95% CI 40, 51%). Of all CD, 31.3% (95% CI 23.8, 38.7) were secondary to urgent fetal indications. However, 79.7% of inductions resulted in vaginal delivery (VD). Factors associated with CD include morbid obesity (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5, 6.1), diabetes (RR 3.9, 95% CI 2.0, 7.3) and severe pre-eclampsia (6.0, 95% CI 1.7, 21.4). Of the 10 most frequent CHD diagnoses, only hypoplastic-left-heart was associated with CD (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.02, 3.4). Although the CD rate is higher in fetal CHD, most indications for CD are maternal.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease (CHD) have increased cesarean delivery (CD) rates, with no outcome improvement.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aim to examine indications for delivery, indications for CD and risk factors associated with CD.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Retrospective cohort of 322 singleton pregnancies prenatally diagnosed with moderate to severe CHD. We compared maternal and fetal factors correlated with delivery route.
RESULTS RESULTS
CD rate was 46% (95% CI 40, 51%). Of all CD, 31.3% (95% CI 23.8, 38.7) were secondary to urgent fetal indications. However, 79.7% of inductions resulted in vaginal delivery (VD). Factors associated with CD include morbid obesity (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5, 6.1), diabetes (RR 3.9, 95% CI 2.0, 7.3) and severe pre-eclampsia (6.0, 95% CI 1.7, 21.4). Of the 10 most frequent CHD diagnoses, only hypoplastic-left-heart was associated with CD (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.02, 3.4).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although the CD rate is higher in fetal CHD, most indications for CD are maternal.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37580511
doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01747-9
pii: 10.1038/s41372-023-01747-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Références

Hoffman JL, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890–1900.
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01886-7 pubmed: 12084585
Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, Mahle WT, Correa A. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in Atlanta, 1998–2005. J Pediatr. 2008;153:807–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.059 pubmed: 18657826 pmcid: 2613036
Ailes EC, Gilboa SM, Riehle-Colarusso T, Johnson CY, Hobbs CA, Correa A, et al. National birth defects prevention study. Prenatal diagnosis of nonsyndromic congenital heart defects. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:214–22.
doi: 10.1002/pd.4282 pubmed: 24222433
Bakker MK, Bergman JEH, Krikov S, Amar E, Cocchi G, Cragan J, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and prevalence of critical congenital heart defects: an international retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e028139.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028139 pubmed: 31270117 pmcid: 6609145
Chakraborty A, Gorla SR, Swaminathan S. Impact of prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease on neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38:958–63.
doi: 10.1002/pd.5351 pubmed: 30171818
Holland BJ, Myers JA, Woods CR Jr. Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:631–8.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14882 pubmed: 25904437
Khoshnood B, Lelong N, Houyel L, Bonnet D, Ballon M, Jouannic JM, et al. EPICARD Study group. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival of newborns with four congenital heart defects: a prospective, population-based cohort study in France (the EPICARD Study). BMJ Open. 2017;7:e018285.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018285 pubmed: 29122798 pmcid: 5695380
Landis BJ, Levey A, Levasseur SM, Glickstein JS, Kleinman CS, Simpson LL, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease and birth outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34:597–605.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0504-4 pubmed: 23052660
Özer Bekmez B, Alyamaç Dizdar E, Okur N, Büyüktiryaki M, Uraş N, Oğuz SS. Does prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart diseases influence the prereferral mortality in a center without surgical intervention? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:3431–4.
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1465551 pubmed: 29712484
Li YF, Zhou KY, Fang J, Wang C, Hua YM, Mu DZ. Efficacy of prenatal diagnosis of major congenital heart disease on perinatal management and perioperative mortality: a meta-analysis. World J Pediatr. 2016;12:298–307.
doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0016-z pubmed: 27059744
Levey A, Glickstein JS, Kleinman CS. The impact of prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease on neonatal outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31:587–97.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-010-9648-2 pubmed: 20165844 pmcid: 2889000
Peyvandi S, Nguyen TA, Almeida-Jones M, Boe N, Rhee L, Anton T, et al. University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC). Timing and mode of delivery in prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease - an analysis of practices within the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC). Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38:588–95.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-016-1552-y pubmed: 28078382 pmcid: 5969910
Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation. 2001;103:1269–73.
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.9.1269 pubmed: 11238272
Mahle WT, Clancy RR, McGaurn SP. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic morbidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1277–82.
doi: 10.1542/peds.107.6.1277 pubmed: 11389243
Ueda K, Ikeda T, Iwanaga N, Katsuragi S, Yamanaka K, Neki R, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in cases of congenital heart disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:64.e1–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.015 pubmed: 19481721
Morikawa M, Endo D, Yamada T, Cho K, Yamada T, Minakami H. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in five fetuses with Ebstein’s anomaly. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:424–8.
doi: 10.1111/jog.12190 pubmed: 24118438
Cedergren MI, Källén BA. Obstetric outcome of 6346 pregnancies with infants affected by congenital heart defects. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;125:211–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.006 pubmed: 16137818
Rossi RM, Divanovic A, DeFranco EA. Obstetric outcomes associated with fetal cyanotic congenital heart disease. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36:701–8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673652 pubmed: 30372776
Cnota JF, Gupta R, Michelfelder EC, Ittenbach RF. Congenital heart disease infant death rates decrease as gestational age advances from 34 to 40 weeks. J Pediatr. 2011;159:761–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.04.020 pubmed: 21676411
Dadlez NM, Brubaker SG, Simpson LL, Yilmaz B, Williams IA. Impact of change in delivery practice on neonatal and maternal outcomes in cases of significant congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2014;9:368–72.
doi: 10.1111/chd.12167 pubmed: 25371936 pmcid: 4221808
Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:29–38.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65 pubmed: 21646928 pmcid: 3751192
Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Laughon SK. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:33–40.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182952242 pubmed: 23743454 pmcid: 3713634
Walsh CA, MacTiernan A, Farrell S, Mulcahy C, McMahon CJ, Franklin O, et al. Mode of delivery in pregnancies complicated by major fetal congenital heart disease: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2014;34:901–5.
doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.104 pubmed: 24875409

Auteurs

Heather Masters (H)

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. fryh@ucmail.uc.edu.

Elisa Marcuccio (E)

Fetal Heart Program, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Alma Jukic (A)

Fetal Heart Program, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

James Cnota (J)

Fetal Heart Program, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Sammy Tabbah (S)

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Allison Divanovic (A)

Fetal Heart Program, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Classifications MeSH