Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model.
Advance care planning
Aortic stenosis
Integrative model
Shared decision making
Systematic literature review
Journal
BMC medical ethics
ISSN: 1472-6939
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088680
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 08 2023
14 08 2023
Historique:
received:
15
06
2022
accepted:
02
08
2023
medline:
16
8
2023
pubmed:
15
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Shared decision making (SDM) and advance care planning (ACP) are important evidence and ethics based concepts that can be translated in communication tools to aid the treatment decision-making process. Although both have been recommended in the care of patients with risks of complications, they have not yet been described as two components of one single process. In this paper we aim to (1) assess how SDM and ACP is being applied, choosing patients with aortic stenosis with high and moderate treatment complication risks such as bleeding or stroke as an example, and (2) propose a model to best combine the two concepts and integrate them in the care process. In order to assess how SDM and ACP is applied in usual care, we have performed a systematic literature review. The included studies have been analysed by means of thematic analysis as well as abductive reasoning to determine which SDM and ACP steps are applied as well as to propose a model of combining the two concepts into one process. The search in Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, Psychinfo and Cochrane revealed 15 studies. Eleven describe various steps of SDM while four studies discuss the documentation of goals of care. Based on the review results and existing evidence we propose a model that combines SDM and ACP in one process for a complete patient informed choice. To be able to make informed choices about immediate and future care, patients should be engaged in both SDM and ACP decision-making processes. This allows for an iterative process in which each important decision-maker can share their expertise and concerns regarding the care planning and advance care planning. This would help to better structure and prioritize information while creating a trustful and respectful relationship between the participants. PROSPERO 2019. CRD42019124575.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Shared decision making (SDM) and advance care planning (ACP) are important evidence and ethics based concepts that can be translated in communication tools to aid the treatment decision-making process. Although both have been recommended in the care of patients with risks of complications, they have not yet been described as two components of one single process. In this paper we aim to (1) assess how SDM and ACP is being applied, choosing patients with aortic stenosis with high and moderate treatment complication risks such as bleeding or stroke as an example, and (2) propose a model to best combine the two concepts and integrate them in the care process.
METHODS
In order to assess how SDM and ACP is applied in usual care, we have performed a systematic literature review. The included studies have been analysed by means of thematic analysis as well as abductive reasoning to determine which SDM and ACP steps are applied as well as to propose a model of combining the two concepts into one process.
RESULTS
The search in Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, Psychinfo and Cochrane revealed 15 studies. Eleven describe various steps of SDM while four studies discuss the documentation of goals of care. Based on the review results and existing evidence we propose a model that combines SDM and ACP in one process for a complete patient informed choice.
CONCLUSION
To be able to make informed choices about immediate and future care, patients should be engaged in both SDM and ACP decision-making processes. This allows for an iterative process in which each important decision-maker can share their expertise and concerns regarding the care planning and advance care planning. This would help to better structure and prioritize information while creating a trustful and respectful relationship between the participants. PROSPERO 2019. CRD42019124575.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37580704
doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7
pii: 10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7
pmc: PMC10426137
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
64Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12
pubmed: 16051459
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):3
pubmed: 29325536
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92
pubmed: 9032835
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022 May 01;34(5):748-754
pubmed: 35394457
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551
pubmed: 28884703
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep;69(9):2605-2611
pubmed: 33989432
Palliat Med. 2014 Sep;28(8):1000-25
pubmed: 24651708
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2695-2702
pubmed: 35674410
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 21;12(4):e0175926
pubmed: 28430791
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197229
pubmed: 31322688
SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Oct 01;7:23779608211038845
pubmed: 34632057
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):442-448
pubmed: 31995126
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1036-43
pubmed: 26275070
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):523-528
pubmed: 26110543
Circulation. 2012 Apr 17;125(15):1928-52
pubmed: 22392529
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0270209
pubmed: 35951553
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):610-621
pubmed: 32114700
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Feb;10(2):
pubmed: 28228452
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jul 26;33(2):210-217
pubmed: 33822041
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:28-33
pubmed: 31350189
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031763
pubmed: 31852700
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2015;61(3):224-37
pubmed: 26388054
Health Expect. 2012 Mar;15(1):3-11
pubmed: 21323823
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227
pubmed: 33332150
BMJ. 2017 Nov 6;359:j4891
pubmed: 29109079
Palliat Med. 2016 May;30(5):423-33
pubmed: 26294218
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):2017-2021
pubmed: 30289968
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Jul;26(7):643-644
pubmed: 28578912
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):245-255.e8
pubmed: 28865870
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jul;15(7):477-489
pubmed: 24598477
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017 Jan;14(1):42-48
pubmed: 28270841
J Patient Exp. 2020 Oct;7(5):688-696
pubmed: 33294602
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2022 Aug-Sep;65(6):589-603
pubmed: 34809525
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):730-736
pubmed: 31002769
Open Heart. 2015 Apr 08;2(1):e000237
pubmed: 25893105
AMA J Ethics. 2020 May 1;22(5):E423-429
pubmed: 32449659