Evaluation of a pregnancy loss education intervention for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland: A pre- and post-test study.
Abortion
Experiences
Fetal anomaly
Miscarriage
Nurses
Nursing
Parent
Pregnancy loss
Termination of pregnancy
Journal
BMC nursing
ISSN: 1472-6955
Titre abrégé: BMC Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088683
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2023
14 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
29
05
2023
accepted:
19
07
2023
medline:
15
8
2023
pubmed:
15
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research highlights the importance of compassionate communication, adequate delivery of information, and professional support to help alleviate parental distress following pregnancy loss. However, many healthcare professionals do not feel sufficiently trained to deal with pregnancy loss in practice. We aimed to address this deficiency with an evidence-informed educational intervention to increase knowledge, skills, self-awareness, and confidence regarding pregnancy loss among UK nursing students. Educational resources, which included an 82-minute podcast and 40-minute online lecture were developed. The podcast focused on the lived experiences of three women who had experienced miscarriage, stillbirth, and termination of pregnancy for medical reasons. The pre-recorded lecture included definitions of types of pregnancy loss, discussion of the importance of communication, and information on the clinical management of pregnancy loss. Students were presented with both the lecture and podcast as a self-directed element of existing curricula. A pre-test/post-test cross-sectional survey design was used to investigate the impact of the educational intervention. The Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (PBCCS) was completed by 244 first year BSc Nursing students before and up to a week after receiving the intervention. Quantitative data were analysed using a Paired Samples Wilcoxon test. Responses to open-ended questions, which allowed students to give feedback on the intervention content and delivery were analysed using Qualitative Content Analysis. 96% (n = 235) of the sample reported having no prior experience or training in the management and support of those experiencing pregnancy loss. At pre-test, 88% (n = 215) of students rated themselves as not confident in dealing with pregnancy loss in a professional capacity. Post-test, we found statistically significant effects for perceived competency on all learning outcomes (p < .001). Qualitative analysis of n = 745 individual text responses to open-ended questions indicated four categories related to the perceived value of using real-life stories for learning, demystifying a taboo subject, and providing tools for practice. Respondents suggested the inclusion of more information on memory-making, support networks, and mental health following pregnancy loss. The educational intervention increased student nurses' perceived knowledge, confidence, and skills in caring for families experiencing pregnancy loss. This offers potential for increased quality of care for those experiencing pregnancy loss in healthcare settings, increased patient satisfaction, and improved mental health-related outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Research highlights the importance of compassionate communication, adequate delivery of information, and professional support to help alleviate parental distress following pregnancy loss. However, many healthcare professionals do not feel sufficiently trained to deal with pregnancy loss in practice. We aimed to address this deficiency with an evidence-informed educational intervention to increase knowledge, skills, self-awareness, and confidence regarding pregnancy loss among UK nursing students.
METHODS
METHODS
Educational resources, which included an 82-minute podcast and 40-minute online lecture were developed. The podcast focused on the lived experiences of three women who had experienced miscarriage, stillbirth, and termination of pregnancy for medical reasons. The pre-recorded lecture included definitions of types of pregnancy loss, discussion of the importance of communication, and information on the clinical management of pregnancy loss. Students were presented with both the lecture and podcast as a self-directed element of existing curricula. A pre-test/post-test cross-sectional survey design was used to investigate the impact of the educational intervention. The Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (PBCCS) was completed by 244 first year BSc Nursing students before and up to a week after receiving the intervention. Quantitative data were analysed using a Paired Samples Wilcoxon test. Responses to open-ended questions, which allowed students to give feedback on the intervention content and delivery were analysed using Qualitative Content Analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
96% (n = 235) of the sample reported having no prior experience or training in the management and support of those experiencing pregnancy loss. At pre-test, 88% (n = 215) of students rated themselves as not confident in dealing with pregnancy loss in a professional capacity. Post-test, we found statistically significant effects for perceived competency on all learning outcomes (p < .001). Qualitative analysis of n = 745 individual text responses to open-ended questions indicated four categories related to the perceived value of using real-life stories for learning, demystifying a taboo subject, and providing tools for practice. Respondents suggested the inclusion of more information on memory-making, support networks, and mental health following pregnancy loss.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The educational intervention increased student nurses' perceived knowledge, confidence, and skills in caring for families experiencing pregnancy loss. This offers potential for increased quality of care for those experiencing pregnancy loss in healthcare settings, increased patient satisfaction, and improved mental health-related outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37580730
doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01408-4
pii: 10.1186/s12912-023-01408-4
pmc: PMC10424365
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
268Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Midwifery. 2018 Nov;66:1-9
pubmed: 30075300
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 11;7(10):e018394
pubmed: 29025848
Qual Health Res. 2020 Jan;30(2):258-267
pubmed: 31535938
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):135-40
pubmed: 11372211
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):262-70
pubmed: 21967678
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 25;16:16
pubmed: 26810220
Nurs Res. 2007 Mar-Apr;56(2):108-16
pubmed: 17356441
Contemp Nurse. 2011 Apr-Jun;38(1-2):76-83
pubmed: 21854239
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):1405-12
pubmed: 22249676
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 26;22(1):441
pubmed: 35619067
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jul;97(7):890-898
pubmed: 29608210
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Oct;117:105479
pubmed: 35863087
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Aug;103:104962
pubmed: 34052663
Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1966-75
pubmed: 19185858
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Mar;49(3):101650
pubmed: 31760179
Zdr Varst. 2019 Dec 13;59(1):1-7
pubmed: 32952697
Women Birth. 2007 Dec;20(4):153-60
pubmed: 17964235
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 08;10(7):e0130059
pubmed: 26154302
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Apr;295(4):845-852
pubmed: 28210863
Lancet. 2021 Aug 28;398(10302):772-785
pubmed: 34454675
Hum Reprod Update. 2018 Nov 1;24(6):731-749
pubmed: 30204882
Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):345-9
pubmed: 26916147
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):e311-e319
pubmed: 31320295
Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):137-146
pubmed: 30153984
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105159
pubmed: 34607237
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Jun;22(3):227-232
pubmed: 28463062
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405
pubmed: 23480423
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2011 Jul;1(2):121-4
pubmed: 22229135
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 2;6(11):e011864
pubmed: 27807081
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0277496
pubmed: 36395201
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;61:51-58
pubmed: 33752063
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 31;22(1):270
pubmed: 35361132
Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):301-304
pubmed: 33894248
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jan;103(1):F22-F28
pubmed: 28667189