Context-aware augmentation for liver lesion segmentation: shape uniformity, expansion limit and fusion strategy.
Context-aware augmentation
expansion limit
liver lesion segmentation
shape uniformity
uneven fusion
Journal
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2023
01 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
19
12
2022
accepted:
18
05
2023
medline:
15
8
2023
pubmed:
15
8
2023
entrez:
15
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data augmentation with context has been an effective way to increase the robustness and generalizability of deep learning models. However, to our knowledge, shape uniformity, expansion limit, and fusion strategy of context have yet to be comprehensively studied, particularly in lesion segmentation of medical images. To examine the impact of these factors, we take liver lesion segmentation based on the well-known deep learning architecture U-Net as an example and thoroughly vary the context shape, the expansion bandwidth as well as three representative fusion methods. In particular, the context shape includes rectangular, circular and polygonal, the expansion bandwidth is scaled by a maximum value of 2 compared to the lesion size, and the context fusion weighting strategy is composed of average, Gaussian and inverse Gaussian. Studies conducted on a newly constructed high-quality and large-volume dataset show that (I) uniform context improves lesion segmentation, (II) expanding the context with either 5 or 7 pixels yields the highest performance for liver lesion segmentation, depending on the lesion size, and (III) an unevenly distributed weighting strategy for context fusion is appreciated but in the opposite direction, depending on lesion size as well. Our findings and newly constructed dataset are expected to be useful for liver lesion segmentation, especially for small lesions.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Data augmentation with context has been an effective way to increase the robustness and generalizability of deep learning models. However, to our knowledge, shape uniformity, expansion limit, and fusion strategy of context have yet to be comprehensively studied, particularly in lesion segmentation of medical images.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
To examine the impact of these factors, we take liver lesion segmentation based on the well-known deep learning architecture U-Net as an example and thoroughly vary the context shape, the expansion bandwidth as well as three representative fusion methods. In particular, the context shape includes rectangular, circular and polygonal, the expansion bandwidth is scaled by a maximum value of 2 compared to the lesion size, and the context fusion weighting strategy is composed of average, Gaussian and inverse Gaussian.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Studies conducted on a newly constructed high-quality and large-volume dataset show that (I) uniform context improves lesion segmentation, (II) expanding the context with either 5 or 7 pixels yields the highest performance for liver lesion segmentation, depending on the lesion size, and (III) an unevenly distributed weighting strategy for context fusion is appreciated but in the opposite direction, depending on lesion size as well.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Our findings and newly constructed dataset are expected to be useful for liver lesion segmentation, especially for small lesions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37581084
doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1399
pii: qims-13-08-5043
pmc: PMC10423356
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5043-5057Informations de copyright
2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-22-1399/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 1;95(4):E100-E107
pubmed: 31140709
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 May;12(5):2620-2633
pubmed: 35502381
Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102152
pubmed: 34280669
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017 Apr;39(4):640-651
pubmed: 27244717
J Pathol Inform. 2022 Feb 07;13:100012
pubmed: 35223136
Nat Methods. 2021 Feb;18(2):203-211
pubmed: 33288961
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021 Jun;43(6):2014-2028
pubmed: 31880540
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jul;134:104497
pubmed: 34022486
Med Image Anal. 2023 Feb;84:102680
pubmed: 36481607
Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102154
pubmed: 34280670
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2021 Sep;92:101968
pubmed: 34390918
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jul 30;21(Suppl 2):89
pubmed: 34330249