Child-centredness in paediatric magnetic resonance imaging: Information needs and experiences of children requiring magnetic resonance imaging and their parents.

child-centred care health services research magnetic resonance imaging quality of care

Journal

Child: care, health and development
ISSN: 1365-2214
Titre abrégé: Child Care Health Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7602632

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Aug 2023
Historique:
revised: 30 06 2023
received: 21 09 2022
accepted: 03 07 2023
medline: 15 8 2023
pubmed: 15 8 2023
entrez: 15 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Assessing patient experiences is essential to provide high quality health-care. The objectives of this study were to examine (1) child- and parent-reported information status before magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), (2) experiences during an MRI and (3) needs and suggestions for improvement. Children (≥8 years) and parents answered questionnaires (before and after planned MRI examination) covering mental condition, information status/needs, preparation for MRI, and potential stressors. Before MRI n = 132 accompanying parents and n = 91 children provided data (after MRI: n = 93 parents; n = 71 children). The mean age of the children undergoing MRI was 10.5 years (SD = 4.9). Children had on average seven previous MRIs before our survey (Range: 1-33). Twenty-three percent of the children were to be sedated during the examination. Parents and children reported low to medium levels of burden, high knowledge and high information status. For the children, most stressful factors during the MRI were boredom and noise. Main information resources were the radiologists or self-searches. Parents of children with their first MRI reported higher anxiety levels in their children and stated a worse information status (main information source: self-searches/internet). Parents reported needs regarding organization of the MRI (e.g., reduction of waiting times), age-appropriate information and communication during the MRI. Children wished to visit the MRI room prior the examination (44%) and to get more information (44%). Children suggested improvements such as better sound quality of films/music, more transparency about the procedure, being in contact with a parent and shorter examinations. Results suggest that preparation, information provision and care is perceived positively by families. Needs and suggestions for improvement were, for example, higher transparency of procedures, better communication and reduction of stress. Findings indicate that preparation in routine-care should follow an individualized child-focused approach, should focus on families without previous MRIs and should address children with high anxiety levels.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Assessing patient experiences is essential to provide high quality health-care. The objectives of this study were to examine (1) child- and parent-reported information status before magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), (2) experiences during an MRI and (3) needs and suggestions for improvement.
METHODS METHODS
Children (≥8 years) and parents answered questionnaires (before and after planned MRI examination) covering mental condition, information status/needs, preparation for MRI, and potential stressors. Before MRI n = 132 accompanying parents and n = 91 children provided data (after MRI: n = 93 parents; n = 71 children). The mean age of the children undergoing MRI was 10.5 years (SD = 4.9). Children had on average seven previous MRIs before our survey (Range: 1-33). Twenty-three percent of the children were to be sedated during the examination.
RESULTS RESULTS
Parents and children reported low to medium levels of burden, high knowledge and high information status. For the children, most stressful factors during the MRI were boredom and noise. Main information resources were the radiologists or self-searches. Parents of children with their first MRI reported higher anxiety levels in their children and stated a worse information status (main information source: self-searches/internet). Parents reported needs regarding organization of the MRI (e.g., reduction of waiting times), age-appropriate information and communication during the MRI. Children wished to visit the MRI room prior the examination (44%) and to get more information (44%). Children suggested improvements such as better sound quality of films/music, more transparency about the procedure, being in contact with a parent and shorter examinations.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that preparation, information provision and care is perceived positively by families. Needs and suggestions for improvement were, for example, higher transparency of procedures, better communication and reduction of stress. Findings indicate that preparation in routine-care should follow an individualized child-focused approach, should focus on families without previous MRIs and should address children with high anxiety levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37581953
doi: 10.1111/cch.13157
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Kindness for Kids-Foundation

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Child: Care, Health and Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Arlachov, Y., & Ganatra, R. (2012). Sedation/anaesthesia in paediatric radiology. The British Journal of Radiology, 85(1019), e1018-e1031. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/28871143
Beattie, M., Murphy, D. J., Atherton, I., & Lauder, W. (2015). Instruments to measure patient experience of healthcare quality in hospitals: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0089-0
Bomher, S. T., Munguia, J. M., Albert, M. S., Nelson, K. W., Bargmann-Losche, J., Platchek, T. S., & Donnelly, L. F. (2020). The approach to improving patient experience at children's hospitals: A primer for pediatric radiologists. Pediatric Radiology, 50(11), 1482-1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04781-3
Bull, C. (2021). Patient satisfaction and patient experience are not interchangeable con-cepts. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 33(1), mzab023. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzab023
Bull, C., Byrnes, J., Hettiarachchi, R., & Downes, M. (2019). A systematic review of the validity and reliabil-ity of patient-reported experience measures. Health Services Research, 54, 1023-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13187
Cahoon, G. D., & Davison, T. E. (2014). Prediction of compliance with MRI procedures among children of ages 3 years to 12 years. Pediatric Radiology, 44(10), 1302-1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2996-y
Capurso, M., Rossetti, C., Mutti, L., Ciani, A., & Santangelo, V. (2020). A low cost, volunteer-based program to prepare children to undergo magnetic resonance imaging without sedation. Children's Health Care, 49(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02739615.2018.1545581
Carter, A. J., Greer, M.-L. C., Gray, S. E., & Ware, R. S. (2010). Mock MRI: Reducing the need for anaesthesia in children. Pediatric Radiology, 40(8), 1368-1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1554-5
Chou, I.-J., Tench, C. R., Gowland, P., Jaspan, T., Dineen, R. A., Evangelou, N., Abdel-Fahim, R., Whitehouse, W. P., & Constantinescu, C. S. (2014). Subjective discomfort in children receiving 3 T MRI and experienced adults' perspective on children's tolerability of 7 T: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. BMJ Open, 4(10), e006094. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006094
Feng, J. Y., Toomey, S. L., Elliott, M. N., Zaslavsky, A. M., Onorato, S. E., & Schuster, M. A. (2020). Factors associated with family experience in pediatric inpatient care. Pediatrics, 145(3), e20191264. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1264
Gårdling, J., & Månsson, M. E. (2014). Children's and Parent's perceptions of a magnetic resonance imaging examination. Journal of Radiology Nursing, 33(1), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradnu.2013.11.006
Harrington, S. G., Jaimes, C., Weagle, K. M., Greer, M.-L. C., & Gee, M. S. (2021). Strategies to perform magnetic resonance imaging in infants and young children without sedation. Pediatric Radiology, 52, 374-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05062-3
Haslund-Thomsen, H., Bauditz, S. J., & Kristensen, H. N. (2021). Familiar in the unfamiliar-Children's, parents', and healthcare professionals' experiences of procedure-related anesthesia in the pediatric oncological ward. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 61, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.03.008
Hogan, D., DiMartino, T., Liu, J., Mastro, K. A., Larson, E., & Carter, E. (2018). Video-based education to reduce distress and improve understanding among pediatric MRI patients: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 41, 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.01.005
Hybschmann, J., Povlsen, N. E., Sørensen, J. L., Afshari, A., Borgwardt, L., Berntsen, M., Madsen, T. W., & Gjaerde, L. K. (2021). Nonpharmacological interventions to reduce sedation/general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 65(9), 1254-1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13851
Koch, B. L., Hater, D. M., & Coley, B. D. (2020). The use of a patient advocate to improve the experience in pediatric radiology. Pediatric Radiology, 50(11), 1499-1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04784-0
Larson, E., Sharma, J., Bohren, M. A., & Tunçalp, Ö. (2019). When the patient is the expert: Measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(8), 563-569. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.225201
McGlashan, H. L., Dineen, R. A., Szeszak, S., Whitehouse, W. P., Chow, G., Love, A., Langmack, G., & Wharrad, H. (2018). Evaluation of an internet-based animated preparatory video for children undergoing non-sedated MRI. The British Journal of Radiology, 91(1087), 20170719. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170719
Morel, B., Andersson, F., Samalbide, M., Binninger, G., Carpentier, E., Sirinelli, D., & Cottier, J. P. (2020). Impact on child and parent anxiety level of a teddy bear-scale mock magnetic resonance scanner. Pediatric Radiology, 50(1), 116-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04514-1
Munn, Z., & Jordan, Z. (2013). Interventions to reduce anxiety, distress, and the need for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review. Journal of Radiology Nursing, 32(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradnu.2012.08.003
Perez, M., Cuscaden, C., Somers, J. F., Simms, N., Shaheed, S., Kehoe, L. A., Holowka, S. A., Aziza, A. A., Shroff, M. M., & Greer, M. L. C. (2019). Easing anxiety in preparation for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study using animal-assisted therapy. Pediatric Radiology, 49, 1000-1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04407-3
Pua, E. P. K., Barton, S., Williams, K., Craig, J. M., & Seal, M. L. (2020). Individualised MRI training for paediatric neuroimaging: A child-focused approach. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 41, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100750
Quigley, D. D., Palimaru, A., Lerner, C., & Hays, R. D. (2020). A review of best practices for monitoring and improving inpatient pediatric patient experiences. Hospital Pediatrics, 10(3), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2019-0243
Riley, A. W. (2004). Evidence that school-age children can self-report on their health. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 4(4), 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1367/A03-178R.1
Staphorst, M. S., Benninga, M. A., Bisschoff, M., Bon, I., Busschbach, J. J. V., Diederen, K., van Goudoever, J. B., Haarman, E. G., Hunfeld, J. A. M., Jaddoe, V. V. W., de Jong, K. J. M., de Jongste, J. C., Kindermann, A., Königs, M., Oos-terlaan, J., Passchier, J., Pijnenburg, M. W., Reneman, L., Ridder, L., … van de Vathorst, S. (2017). The child's perspective on discomfort during medical research procedures: A descriptive study. BMJ Open, 7(7), e016077. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016077
Sum, M., Ong, Y., Low, S., Lye, W., & Tang, P. (2019). Using a checklist to assess if a child undergoing MRI needs general anaesthesia. Clinical Radiology, 74(6), 17-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.015
Sze, R. W., Vera, C. D., Hogan, L., & Iyer, R. S. (2019). If Disney ran your pediatric radiology department: A different approach to improving the patient and family experience. Pediatric Radiology, 49(4), 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4308-4
Szeszak, S., Man, R., Love, A., Langmack, G., Wharrad, H., & Dineen, R. A. (2016). Animated educational video to prepare children for MRI without sedation: Evaluation of the appeal and value. Pediatric Radiology, 46, 1744-1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3661-4
Towbin, A. J., O'Connor, T., Perry, L. A., Moskovitz, J. A., Miñano, G. G., Regan, J., Hulefeld, D., Schwieterman, E., Hater, D., & Smith, R. L. (2020). Using informatics to engage patients. Pediatric Radiology, 50(11), 1514-1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04767-1
Westra, A. E., Zegers, M. P., Sukhai, R. N., Kaptein, A. A., Holscher, H. C., Ballieux, B. E., van Zwet, E. W., & Wit, J. M. (2011). Discomfort in children undergoing unsedated MRI. European Journal of Pediatrics, 170(6), 771-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-010-1351-z
Xu, H. S., Cavaliere, R. M., & Min, R. J. (2020). Transforming the imaging experience while decreasing sedation rates. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 17(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.08.005

Auteurs

Laura Inhestern (L)

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Jochen Herrmann (J)

Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Jana Schürmann (J)

Faculty of Educational Science, University of Education Freiburg, Breisgau, Germany.

Rieke Lisa Meister (RL)

Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Marie Teresa Nawka (MT)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Martin Mynarek (M)

Department for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center HaTriCS4, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Dieter Linhart (D)

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Corinna Bergelt (C)

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Classifications MeSH