Quantifying the efficacy of an automated facial coding software using videos of parents.
ALSPAC
FaceReader
automated facial coding
facial expressions
parenting
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
17
05
2023
accepted:
10
07
2023
medline:
16
8
2023
pubmed:
16
8
2023
entrez:
16
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This work explores the use of an automated facial coding software - FaceReader - as an alternative and/or complementary method to manual coding. We used videos of parents (fathers, We found that the automated facial detection rate was low (25.2% for fathers, 24.6% for mothers) compared to manual coding, and discuss some potential explanations for this (e.g., poor lighting and facial occlusion). Our logistic regression analyses found that Surprise and Positive expressions had strong predictive capabilities, whilst Negative expressions performed poorly. Mothers' faces were more important for predicting Positive and Neutral expressions, whilst fathers' faces were more important in predicting Negative and Surprise expressions. We discuss the implications of our findings in the context of future automated facial coding studies, and we emphasise the need to consider gender-specific influences in automated facial coding research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37583610
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223806
pmc: PMC10425266
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1223806Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G9815508
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_15018
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19009
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Burgess, Culpin, Costantini, Bould, Nabney and Pearson.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Feb 20;4:36
pubmed: 31984238
J Nonverbal Behav. 2023;47(2):117-210
pubmed: 37162792
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):544-8
pubmed: 19653777
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):111-27
pubmed: 22507743
Cogn Emot. 2020 Aug;34(5):986-993
pubmed: 31726935
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 May;47:62-71
pubmed: 28347907
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 12;10:259
pubmed: 30809180
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Mar 14;4:51
pubmed: 31020050
Front Psychol. 2021 May 05;12:627561
pubmed: 34025503
Front Neurosci. 2023 May 02;17:1125983
pubmed: 37205049
Sci Data. 2020 Sep 8;7(1):293
pubmed: 32901038
Infancy. 2009 May 1;14(3):285-305
pubmed: 19885384
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0281309
pubmed: 36763694
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 3;17(3):e0263863
pubmed: 35239654
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Feb;27(1):76-85
pubmed: 23421835
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Aug;31(3):871-886
pubmed: 30919792
Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):305-34
pubmed: 12696842
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 19;11:1388
pubmed: 32636788
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):97-110
pubmed: 22507742
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223905
pubmed: 31622426
Cogn Emot. 2021 Aug;35(5):874-889
pubmed: 33761825