Latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction: a large single-institution evaluation of surgical outcome and complications.
Autologous reconstruction
Breast cancer
Breast reconstruction
Latissimus dorsi flap
Thoracic reconstruction
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2023
16 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
16
06
2023
accepted:
02
08
2023
medline:
16
8
2023
pubmed:
16
8
2023
entrez:
16
8
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The use of autologous tissues is considered gold standard for patients undergoing breast reconstruction and is the preferred method in the post-radiation setting. Although the latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) has been replaced by abdominal flaps as technique of choice, it remains a valuable option in several specific clinical situations and its use has been regaining popularity in recent years. In this work, we present an 18-year retrospective analysis of a single-institution single-surgeon experience with LDF-based reconstruction with focus on early complications and reconstructive failures. Hospital records of all patients undergoing breast surgery for any reason in the Certified Breast Cancer Center, Regio Klinikum Pinneberg, Germany between April, 1st 2005 and October, 31st 2022 were reviewed. 142 consecutive LDF-based reconstructive procedures were identified. Detailed information was gathered on patient characteristics, treatment-related factors, and complications. One hundred forty patients (139 female, 1 male) received 142 LDF-based surgeries. The flap was used mainly for immediate breast reconstruction with or without implant (83% of patients), followed by defect coverage after removal of a large tumor (7%), implant-to-flap conversion with or without placement of a new implant (6%), and delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction (4%). The use of LDF decreased between 2005 and 2020 (2005: 17, 2006: 13, 2007: 14, 2008: 16, 2009: 5, 2010: 9, 2011: 8, 2012: 3, 2013: 10, 2014: 8, 2015: 8, 2016: 7, 2017: 7, 2018: 4, 2019: 4, 2020: 2, 2021: 6, 2022: 4). Surgery was performed for invasive breast cancer in 78%, ductal carcinoma in situ in 20% and other reasons such as genetic mutation in 1% of patients. Ipsilateral radiation therapy was received by 12% of patients prior to LDF surgery and by 37% after the surgery. 25% of patients were smokers. The median duration of surgery, including all procedures conducted simultaneously such as e.g., mastectomy, axillary surgery, or implant placement, was 117 min (range 56-205). Patients stayed in the hospital for a median of 7 days (range 2-23 days). The most common complication was seroma (26%), followed by wound dehiscence (8%), surgical site infection (7%), partial skin and/or nipple necrosis of any size (7%) and hematoma requiring surgical evacuation (2%). 19% of all patients required seroma aspiration or drainage, mostly at the donor site and performed under ultrasound guidance in the ambulatory setting. Flap loss due to necrosis occurred in 2% of patients. Latissimus dorsi flap is a well-established surgical technique commonly used for immediate breast reconstruction as well as defect coverage in locally advanced breast cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest single-surgeon analyses of early complications in patients receiving LDF. As expected, seroma was the most common complication observed in nearly one third of patients and requiring a therapeutic intervention in every fifth patient. Serious adverse events occurred rarely, and flap loss rate was very low.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37584773
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07186-3
pii: 10.1007/s00404-023-07186-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Recommendations of the AGO Breast Committee (2022) Diagnosis and treatment of patients with early and advanced Breast Cancer, www.ago-online.de . Accessed 15 Aug 2023
(2021) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Breast Cancer, Version 2.2021—March 12, 2021, NCCN.org
Sood R, Easow JM, Konopka G, Panthaki ZJ (2018) Latissimus dorsi flap in breast reconstruction: recent innovations in the workhorse flap. Cancer Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274817744638
doi: 10.1177/1073274817744638
pubmed: 29334788
pmcid: 5933575
Papp C, McCraw JB (1998) Autogenous latissimus breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 25:261–266
doi: 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)32504-9
pubmed: 9627783
Hokin JA, Silfverskiold KL (1987) Breast reconstruction without an implant: results and complications using an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:58–66
doi: 10.1097/00006534-198701000-00010
pubmed: 3797518
Durkin AJ, Pierpont YN, Patel S, Tavana ML, Uberti MG, Payne WG, Smith DJ, Smith PD (2010) An algorithmic approach to breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1318–1327. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d6e7b8
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d6e7b8
pubmed: 20145585
Hardwicke JT, Prinsloo DJ (2011) An analysis of 277 consecutive latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions: a focus on capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174133
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174133
pubmed: 21701322
Sternberg EG, Perdikis G, McLaughlin SA, Terkonda SP, Waldorf JC (2006) Latissimus dorsi flap remains an excellent choice for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 56:31–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000186463.07617.6f
doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000186463.07617.6f
pubmed: 16374092
Pinsolle V, Grinfeder C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Faucher A (2006) Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.03.057
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.03.057
pubmed: 16996422
Chang DW, Barnea Y, Robb GL (2008) Effects of an autologous flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 1000 consecutive reconstructions of previously irradiated breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:356–362. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d6303
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d6303
pubmed: 18626350
(2015) National German Guideline (S3): Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue, AWMF Registry No. 015/075
Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller H, Friese K (1999) Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: improved aesthetic results after transection of its humeral insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1876–1881. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199906000-00011
doi: 10.1097/00006534-199906000-00011
pubmed: 10359248
Palve J, Luukkaala T, Kaariainen M (2022) Comparison of different techniques in latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: plain, immediately lipofilled, and implant enhanced. Ann Plast Surg 88:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798
pubmed: 33661213
Daltrey I, Thomson H, Hussien M, Krishna K, Rayter Z, Winters ZE (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of quilting latissimus dorsi flap donor site on seroma formation. Br J Surg 93:825–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5434
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5434
pubmed: 16775818
Tomita K, Yano K, Masuoka T, Matsuda K, Takada A, Hosokawa K (2007) Postoperative seroma formation in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: a retrospective study of 174 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg 59:149–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802c54ef
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802c54ef
pubmed: 17667407
Lee KT, Mun GH (2015) Fibrin sealants and quilting suture for prevention of seroma formation following latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39:399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0476-x
doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0476-x
pubmed: 25808821
Menke H, Erkens M, Olbrisch RR (2001) Evolving concepts in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: results and follow-up of 121 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 47:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200108000-00001
doi: 10.1097/00000637-200108000-00001
pubmed: 11506316
Schwabegger A, Ninkovic M, Brenner E, Anderl H (1997) Seroma as a common donor site morbidity after harvesting the latissimus dorsi flap: observations on cause and prevention. Ann Plast Surg 38:594–597. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199706000-00005
doi: 10.1097/00000637-199706000-00005
pubmed: 9188974
Paillocher N, Florczak AS, Richard M, Classe JM, Oger AS, Raro P, Wernert R, Lorimier G (2016) Evaluation of mastectomy with immediate autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy: a single institution study of 111 cases of invasive breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:949–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.024
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.024
pubmed: 27134148
Houvenaeghel G, El Hajj H, Schmitt A, Cohen M, Rua S, Barrou J, Lambaudie E, Bannier M (2020) Robotic-assisted skin sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using latissimus dorsi flap a new effective and safe technique: a comparative study. Surg Oncol 35:406–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.09.022
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.09.022
pubmed: 33035789
Giacalone PL, Rathat G, Daures JP, Benos P, Azria D, Rouleau C (2010) New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0951-7
doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0951-7
pubmed: 20502959
Clarke-Pearson EM, Lin AM, Hertl C, Austen WG, Colwell AS (2016) Revisions in implant-based breast reconstruction: how does direct-to-implant measure up? Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1690–1699. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002173
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002173
pubmed: 27219225
Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hu Q, Van Zee K (2014) The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of long-term surgical outcomes, aesthetic results, and satisfaction over 13 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:588–595. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000523
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000523
pubmed: 25357021
Tarantino I, Banic A, Fischer T (2006) Evaluation of late results in breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi flap and prosthesis implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000207396.22527.68
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000207396.22527.68
pubmed: 16641703
Button J, Scott J, Taghizadeh R, Weiler-Mithoff E, Hart AM (2010) Shoulder function following autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. A prospective three year observational study comparing quilting and non-quilting donor site techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1505–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.08.017
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.08.017
pubmed: 19819774
Steffenssen MCW, Kristiansen AH, Damsgaard TE (2019) A Systematic review and meta-analysis of functional shoulder impairment after latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 82:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001691
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001691
pubmed: 30516558
Wallwiener D, Jonat W, Kreienberg R, Friese K, Diedrich K, Beckmann MW (2009) Atlas der gynäkologischen Operationen, 7th edn. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
Abdallah A (2009) Onkoplastische Brustchirurgie. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Köln
Kaariainen M, Giordano S, Kauhanen S, Helminen M, Kuokkanen H (2014) No need to cut the nerve in LD reconstruction to avoid jumping of the breast: a prospective randomized study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:1106–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.029
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.029
pubmed: 24933238
Lopez CD, Kraenzlin F, Frost C, Darrach H, Aravind P, Sacks JM (2019) Latissimus denervation: a review of evidence. J Reconstr Microsurg 35:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688748
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688748
pubmed: 31067584
Jones GE (2020) Latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Bostwick’s plastic and reconstructive breast surgery. Volume II: part VII non-microsurgical breast reconstruction. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Ditsch N. 2023 Atlas der onkoplastischen Brustoperationen (in press): Elsevier
Leff DR, Bottle A, Mayer E, Patten DK, Rao C, Aylin P, Hadjiminas DJ, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Gui G (2015) Trends in immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the United Kingdom. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e507. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000484
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000484
pubmed: 26495220
pmcid: 4596432
Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Matros E (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cde
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cde
pubmed: 23271515
Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, Lee G, Curtin C (2013) Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 19:463–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12148
doi: 10.1111/tbj.12148
pubmed: 23758582
Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, Alderman A, Giordano SH, Buchholz TA, Kronowitz SJ, Smith BD (2014) Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States. J Clin Oncol 32:919–926. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2284
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2284
pubmed: 24550418
pmcid: 4876312
Findlay-Shirras L, Lima I, Smith G, Clemons M, Arnaout A (2021) Canada follows the US in the rise of bilateral mastectomies for unilateral breast cancer: a 23-year population cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 185:517–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05965-z
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05965-z
pubmed: 33128192
Shaheen MS, Momeni A (2022) Nationwide trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomies: an analysis of 55,060 unilateral breast cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10:e4344. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004344
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004344
pubmed: 35646492
pmcid: 9132527