Transient naive reprogramming corrects hiPS cells functionally and epigenetically.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
04
06
2021
accepted:
11
07
2023
medline:
25
8
2023
pubmed:
17
8
2023
entrez:
16
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cells undergo a major epigenome reconfiguration when reprogrammed to human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPS cells). However, the epigenomes of hiPS cells and human embryonic stem (hES) cells differ significantly, which affects hiPS cell function
Identifiants
pubmed: 37587336
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06424-7
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-06424-7
pmc: PMC10447250
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromatin
0
DNA Transposable Elements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
863-872Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Kim, K. et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 467, 285–290 (2010).
pubmed: 20644535
pmcid: 3150836
doi: 10.1038/nature09342
Polo, J. M. et al. Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 848–855 (2010).
pubmed: 20644536
pmcid: 3148605
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1667
Kim, K. et al. Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1117–1119 (2011).
pubmed: 22119740
pmcid: 3357310
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2052
Lister, R. et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471, 68–73 (2011).
pubmed: 21289626
pmcid: 3100360
doi: 10.1038/nature09798
Ohi, Y. et al. Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 541–549 (2011).
pubmed: 21499256
pmcid: 3987913
doi: 10.1038/ncb2239
Ruiz, S. et al. Identification of a specific reprogramming-associated epigenetic signature in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16196–16201 (2012).
pubmed: 22991473
pmcid: 3479609
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202352109
Bar-Nur, O., Russ, H. A., Efrat, S. & Benvenisty, N. Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells. Cell Stem Cell 9, 17–23 (2011).
pubmed: 21726830
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.007
Panopoulos, A. D. et al. Aberrant DNA methylation in human iPSCs associates with MYC-binding motifs in a clone-specific manner independent of genetics. Cell Stem Cell 20, 505–517.e6 (2017).
pubmed: 28388429
pmcid: 5444384
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.03.010
Yamanaka, S. & Blau, H. M. Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature 465, 704–712 (2010).
pubmed: 20535199
pmcid: 2901154
doi: 10.1038/nature09229
Guenther, M. G. et al. Chromatin structure and gene expression programs of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7, 249–257 (2010).
pubmed: 20682450
pmcid: 3010384
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.015
Choi, J. et al. A comparison of genetically matched cell lines reveals the equivalence of human iPSCs and ESCs. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1173–1181 (2015).
pubmed: 26501951
pmcid: 4847940
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3388
Tapia, N. & Schöler, H. R. Molecular obstacles to clinical translation of iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 19, 298–309 (2016).
pubmed: 27452174
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.017
Ma, H. et al. Abnormalities in human pluripotent cells due to reprogramming mechanisms. Nature 511, 177–183 (2014).
pubmed: 25008523
pmcid: 4898064
doi: 10.1038/nature13551
Cacchiarelli, D. et al. Integrative analyses of human reprogramming reveal dynamic nature of induced pluripotency. Cell 162, 412–424 (2015).
pubmed: 26186193
pmcid: 4511597
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.016
Xing, Q. R. et al. Diversification of reprogramming trajectories revealed by parallel single-cell transcriptome and chromatin accessibility sequencing. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba1190 (2020).
pubmed: 32917699
pmcid: 7486102
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1190
Liu, X. et al. Comprehensive characterization of distinct states of human naive pluripotency generated by reprogramming. Nat. Methods 14, 1055–1062 (2017).
pubmed: 28945704
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4436
Giulitti, S. et al. Direct generation of human naive induced pluripotent stem cells from somatic cells in microfluidics. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 275–286 (2019).
pubmed: 30598530
doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0254-5
Wang, Y. et al. Unique molecular events during reprogramming of human somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) at naïve state.eLife 7, e29518 (2018).
pubmed: 29381138
pmcid: 5807049
doi: 10.7554/eLife.29518
Guo, G. et al. Naive pluripotent stem cells derived directly from isolated cells of the human inner cell mass. Stem Cell Rep. 6, 437–446 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.02.005
Theunissen, T. W. et al. Molecular criteria for defining the naive human pluripotent state. Cell Stem Cell 19, 502–515 (2016).
pubmed: 27424783
pmcid: 5065525
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.011
Pastor, W. A. et al. Naive human pluripotent cells feature a methylation landscape devoid of blastocyst or germline memory. Cell Stem Cell 18, 323–329 (2016).
pubmed: 26853856
pmcid: 4779431
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.01.019
Liu, X. et al. Reprogramming roadmap reveals route to human induced trophoblast stem cells. Nature 586, 101–107 (2020).
pubmed: 32939092
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2734-6
Knaupp, A. S. et al. Transient and permanent reconfiguration of chromatin and transcription factor occupancy drive reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 21, 834–845.e6 (2017).
pubmed: 29220667
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.007
Roost, M. S. et al. DNA methylation and transcriptional trajectories during human development and reprogramming of isogenic pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 908 (2017).
pubmed: 29030611
pmcid: 5640655
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01077-3
Bar, S., Schachter, M., Eldar-Geva, T. & Benvenisty, N. Large-scale analysis of loss of imprinting in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. 19, 957–968 (2017).
pubmed: 28467909
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.020
Court, F. et al. Genome-wide parent-of-origin DNA methylation analysis reveals the intricacies of human imprinting and suggests a germline methylation-independent mechanism of establishment. Genome Res. 24, 554–569 (2014).
pubmed: 24402520
pmcid: 3975056
doi: 10.1101/gr.164913.113
Lee, H. J., Hore, T. A. & Reik, W. Reprogramming the methylome: erasing memory and creating diversity. Cell Stem Cell 14, 710–719 (2014).
pubmed: 24905162
pmcid: 4051243
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.008
van Steensel, B. & Belmont, A. S. Lamina-associated domains: links with chromosome architecture, heterochromatin, and gene repression. Cell 169, 780–791 (2017).
pubmed: 28525751
pmcid: 5532494
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.022
Soufi, A., Donahue, G. & Zaret, K. S. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors’ initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151, 994–1004 (2012).
pubmed: 23159369
pmcid: 3508134
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.045
Godoy, P. et al. Assessment of stem cell differentiation based on genome-wide expression profiles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20170221 (2018).
pubmed: 29786556
pmcid: 5974444
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0221
Ortmann, D. et al. Naive pluripotent stem cells exhibit phenotypic variability that is driven by genetic variation. Cell Stem Cell 27, 470–481.e6 (2020).
pubmed: 32795399
pmcid: 7487768
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.07.019
Skelly, D. A. et al. Mapping the effects of genetic variation on chromatin state and gene expression reveals loci that control ground state pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 27, 459–469.e8 (2020).
pubmed: 32795400
pmcid: 7484384
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.07.005
Pontis, J. et al. Hominoid-specific transposable elements and KZFPs facilitate human embryonic genome activation and control transcription in naive human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 24, 724–735.e5 (2019).
pubmed: 31006620
pmcid: 6509360
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.012
Guo, G. et al. Epigenetic resetting of human pluripotency. Development 144, 2748–2763 (2017).
pubmed: 28765214
pmcid: 5560041
doi: 10.1242/dev.146811
Greenberg, M. V. C. & Bourc’his, D. The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 590–607 (2019).
pubmed: 31399642
doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0159-6
Friedli, M. et al. Loss of transcriptional control over endogenous retroelements during reprogramming to pluripotency. Genome Res. 24, 1251–1259 (2014).
pubmed: 24879558
pmcid: 4120079
doi: 10.1101/gr.172809.114
Ohnuki, M. et al. Dynamic regulation of human endogenous retroviruses mediates factor-induced reprogramming and differentiation potential. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12426–12431 (2014).
pubmed: 25097266
pmcid: 4151758
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413299111
Müller, F.-J. et al. A bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cells. Nat. Methods 8, 315–317 (2011).
pubmed: 21378979
pmcid: 3265323
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1580
Koyanagi-Aoi, M. et al. Differentiation-defective phenotypes revealed by large-scale analyses of human pluripotent stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20569–20574 (2013).
pubmed: 24259714
pmcid: 3870695
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319061110
Poleshko, A. et al. Genome–nuclear lamina interactions regulate cardiac stem cell lineage restriction. Cell 171, 573–587.e14 (2017).
pubmed: 29033129
pmcid: 5683101
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.018
Wang, C. et al. Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin during mammalian embryo development. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 620–631 (2018).
pubmed: 29686265
doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0093-4
Guo, H. et al. The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos. Nature 511, 606–610 (2014).
pubmed: 25079557
doi: 10.1038/nature13544
Salvador-Palomeque, C. et al. Dynamic methylation of an L1 transduction family during reprogramming and neurodifferentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 39, e00499–18 (2019).
pubmed: 30692270
pmcid: 6425141
doi: 10.1128/MCB.00499-18
Kyttälä, A. et al. Genetic variability overrides the impact of parental cell type and determines iPSC differentiation potential. Stem Cell Rep. 6, 200–212 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.12.009
Rouhani, F. et al. Genetic background drives transcriptional variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004432 (2014).
pubmed: 24901476
pmcid: 4046971
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004432
Matoba, S. et al. Embryonic development following somatic cell nuclear transfer impeded by persisting histone methylation. Cell 159, 884–895 (2014).
pubmed: 25417163
pmcid: 4243038
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.055
Fishilevich, S. et al. GeneHancer: genome-wide integration of enhancers and target genes in GeneCards. Database 2017, bax028 (2017).
pubmed: 28605766
pmcid: 5467550
doi: 10.1093/database/bax028
Polo, J., Liu, X. & Nefzger, C. Establishment and maintenance of human naive pluripotent stem cells by primed to naive conversion and reprogramming of fibroblasts. Protoc. Exch. https://doi.org/10.1038/protex.2017.099 (2017).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
pubmed: 29750242
pmcid: 6137996
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Ewing, A. D. et al. Nanopore sequencing enables comprehensive transposable element epigenomic profiling. Mol. Cell 80, 915–928.e5 (2020).
pubmed: 33186547
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.024
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
pubmed: 20110278
pmcid: 2832824
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
Efron, B. The 1977 RIETZ lecture. Ann. Stat. 7, 1–26 (1979).
Butcher, L. M. et al. Non-CG DNA methylation is a biomarker for assessing endodermal differentiation capacity in pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 10458 (2016).
pubmed: 26822956
pmcid: 4740175
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10458
Hannan, N. R. F., Segeritz, C.-P., Touboul, T. & Vallier, L. Production of hepatocyte-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 8, 430–437 (2013).
pubmed: 23424751
pmcid: 3673228
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.153
Vargas-Landin, D. B., Pflüger, J. & Lister, R. Generation of whole genome bisulfite sequencing libraries for comprehensive DNA methylome analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1767, 291–298 (2018).
pubmed: 29524142
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7774-1_16
Chen, P.-Y., Cokus, S. J. & Pellegrini, M. BS Seeker: precise mapping for bisulfite sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 203 (2010).
pubmed: 20416082
pmcid: 2871274
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-203
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
pubmed: 19261174
pmcid: 2690996
doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25
Tarasov, A., Vilella, A. J., Cuppen, E., Nijman, I. J. & Prins, P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics 31, 2032–2034 (2015).
pubmed: 25697820
pmcid: 4765878
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv098
Guo, W. et al. CGmapTools improves the precision of heterozygous SNV calls and supports allele-specific methylation detection and visualization in bisulfite-sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34, 381–387 (2018).
pubmed: 28968643
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx595
Korthauer, K., Chakraborty, S., Benjamini, Y. & Irizarry, R. A. Detection and accurate false discovery rate control of differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulfite sequencing. Biostatistics 20, 367–383 (2019).
pubmed: 29481604
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy007
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
pubmed: 30423086
pmcid: 6129281
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).
pubmed: 25751142
pmcid: 4655817
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317
Jin, Y., Tam, O. H., Paniagua, E. & Hammell, M. TEtranscripts: a package for including transposable elements in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq datasets. Bioinformatics 31, 3593–3599 (2015).
pubmed: 26206304
pmcid: 4757950
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv422
Kumar, L. & E Futschik, M. Mfuzz: a software package for soft clustering of microarray data. Bioinformation 2, 5–7 (2007).
pubmed: 18084642
pmcid: 2139991
doi: 10.6026/97320630002005
Reimand, J., Kull, M., Peterson, H., Hansen, J. & Vilo, J. g:Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W193–W200 (2007).
pubmed: 17478515
pmcid: 1933153
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm226
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
pubmed: 20513432
pmcid: 2898526
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004
McCole, R. B., Erceg, J., Saylor, W. & Wu, C.-T. Ultraconserved elements occupy specific arenas of three-dimensional mammalian genome organization. Cell Rep. 24, 479–488 (2018).
pubmed: 29996107
pmcid: 6363003
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.031
Burger, L., Gaidatzis, D., Schübeler, D. & Stadler, M. B. Identification of active regulatory regions from DNA methylation data. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e155 (2013).
pubmed: 23828043
pmcid: 3763559
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt599
Dekker, J. et al. The 4D nucleome project. Nature 549, 219–226 (2017).
pubmed: 28905911
pmcid: 5617335
doi: 10.1038/nature23884
Reiff, S. B. et al. The 4D Nucleome Data Portal as a resource for searching and visualizing curated nucleomics data. Nat. Commun. 13, 2365 (2022).
pubmed: 35501320
pmcid: 9061818
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29697-4
ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11247
Schultz, M. D. et al. Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature 523, 212–216 (2015).
pubmed: 26030523
pmcid: 4499021
doi: 10.1038/nature14465