Survivor engagement: Experience with an advocacy-based model in Washington, D.C.


Journal

Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture
ISSN: 1997-3322
Titre abrégé: Torture
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9309086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
medline: 18 8 2023
pubmed: 17 8 2023
entrez: 17 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As an IRCT member organization supporting survivors of torture, the Torture Abolition and Survivor Support Coalition (TASSC) International places survivor engagement at the core of their work, aiming to provide safe and inclusive spaces for survivors to speak out and take meaningful action to prevent torture. This article describes TASSC's model for engaging survivors in advocacy and presents evidence on the personal impacts such engagement can have. Each year from 2016-2019, TASSC administered a simple survey with questions for survivors to complete after their annual "Advocacy Day" in Washington D.C. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected to inform internal service provision and the design of future events. Across the four years a total of 140 survivors and compatriot human rights advocates participated in the annual Advocacy Day, and a majority completed the surveys. In their survey responses, survivors agreed they had many positive thoughts and feelings after advocacy. Their reported positive experiences included a sense of being listened to and heard by an understanding and responsive audience, the power of feeling part of a group that was speaking out on behalf of themselves and others, and a sense of motivation and hopefulness for the future. Although undertaken primarily to inform internal processes, TASSC's surveys with survivors who engaged in advocacy shed light on the potential value of well-designed advocacy experiences. Consistent with past research, survivors reported strong motivations around and compelling benefits from participating, despite the challenges that the deeply personal nature of their engagement could present. This feedback suggests TASSC has a strong model that could be replicated elsewhere, but it would be beneficial to further investigate the experiences of survivors engaging in advocacy in other country settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37589067
doi: 10.7146/torture.v33i2.135716
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

85-101

Auteurs

Seini O Connor (S)

Refugees As Survivors (RASNZ), Auckland, New Zealand. Correspondence to seini.oconnor@gmail.com.

Andrea Barron (A)

Torture Abolition and Survivors' Support Coalition, Washington, D.C., USA. Correspondence to andrea@tassc.org.

Léonce Byimana (L)

US Clinical Programs, Center for Victims of Torture, USA. Correspondence to: lbyimana@cvt.org.

Jennifer Isley (J)

Licensed Independent Clinical Social Worker (Private Practice), USA. Correspondence to jennifer.isely@gmail.com.

Sheetal Patel (S)

Psychologist (Private Practice), Washington D.C., USA. Correspondence to: sheetal.patel2@gmail.com.

Yadhu Dhital (Y)

Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Correspondence to: dhitalyr@gmail.com.

Nouf Bazaz (N)

Loyola University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Correspondence to: nsbazaz@loyola.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH