Bruxism and dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
bruxism
dental implants
meta-analysis
survival
systematic review
Journal
Journal of oral rehabilitation
ISSN: 1365-2842
Titre abrégé: J Oral Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0433604
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2023
17 Aug 2023
Historique:
revised:
24
04
2023
received:
31
10
2022
accepted:
07
08
2023
medline:
17
8
2023
pubmed:
17
8
2023
entrez:
17
8
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Overload from bruxism may affect survival of dental implants. To evaluate implant failure and marginal bone loss (MBL) in patients presenting with probable bruxism compared to non-bruxers. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021238397). An electronic search September 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Science Direct was combined with a hand search. Two independent reviewers carried out abstract screening, full-text assessment, quality assessment (National Institutes of Health tool) and data extraction. Only studies that provided information on self-report and clinical examination needed for the diagnosis of at least 'probable' bruxism were included. A pairwise random-effect meta-analysis was carried out. In total 1338 studies were identified, and after screening and full-text assessment 27 studies that presented data on 2105 implants in probable bruxers and 10 264 implants in non-bruxers were included, with 138 and 352 implant failures in respective groups. the meta-analysis showed that implants placed in probable bruxers had a higher risk of failure than in non-bruxers (OR 2.189; 95% CI 1.337, 3.583, p = .002). A meta-regression showed that follow-up time did not affect this OR. Eighteen studies provided general data on MBL but did not report results separated between bruxers and non-bruxers. Therefore, an analysis of MBL was not possible. The results of the present systematic review show that implants placed in probable bruxers present a significantly higher risk of failure than implants placed in non-bruxers. This should be considered in treatment planning and management of implant patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Overload from bruxism may affect survival of dental implants.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate implant failure and marginal bone loss (MBL) in patients presenting with probable bruxism compared to non-bruxers. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021238397).
METHODS
METHODS
An electronic search September 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Science Direct was combined with a hand search. Two independent reviewers carried out abstract screening, full-text assessment, quality assessment (National Institutes of Health tool) and data extraction. Only studies that provided information on self-report and clinical examination needed for the diagnosis of at least 'probable' bruxism were included. A pairwise random-effect meta-analysis was carried out.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total 1338 studies were identified, and after screening and full-text assessment 27 studies that presented data on 2105 implants in probable bruxers and 10 264 implants in non-bruxers were included, with 138 and 352 implant failures in respective groups. the meta-analysis showed that implants placed in probable bruxers had a higher risk of failure than in non-bruxers (OR 2.189; 95% CI 1.337, 3.583, p = .002). A meta-regression showed that follow-up time did not affect this OR. Eighteen studies provided general data on MBL but did not report results separated between bruxers and non-bruxers. Therefore, an analysis of MBL was not possible.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the present systematic review show that implants placed in probable bruxers present a significantly higher risk of failure than implants placed in non-bruxers. This should be considered in treatment planning and management of implant patients.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(1):2-4.
Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Bruxism is mainly regulated centrally, not peripherally. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(12):1085-1091.
Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(11):837-844.
Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism and dental implant failures: a multilevel mixed effects parametric survival analysis approach. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(11):813-823.
Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism and dental implant treatment complications: a retrospective comparative study of 98 bruxer patients and a matched group. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):e1-e9.
Brägger U, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(1):26-34.
De Boever AL, Keersmaekers K, Vanmaele G, Kerschbaum T, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(11):833-839.
Maló P, Nobre M, Lopes A. The rehabilitation of completely edentulous maxillae with different degrees of resorption with four or more immediately loaded implants: a 5-year retrospective study and a new classification. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4(3):227-243.
Anitua E, Saracho J, Almeida GZ, Duran-Cantolla J, Alkhraisat MH. Frequency of prosthetic complications related to implant-borne prosthesis in a sleep disorder unit. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43(1):19-23.
Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Larsson C. Retrospective clinical evaluation of 2-to 6-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: mean follow-up of 9 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(2):201-212.
Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Larsson C. Retrospective evaluation of implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses after a mean follow-up of 10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(7):634-645.
Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Larsson C. Analysis of technical complications and risk factors for failure of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(4):523-532.
Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Factors influencing the fracture of dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(1):58-67.
Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F, Hublin C, Piirtola M, Kaprio J. Self-reported sleep bruxism in 1990 and 2011 in a nationwide twin cohort: evidence of trait persistence and genetic liability. J Oral Rehabil. 2022.
Lobbezoo F, Visscher CM, Ahlberg J, Manfredini D. Bruxism and genetics: a review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(9):709-714.
Manfredini D, Serra-Negra J, Carboncini F, Lobbezoo F. Current concepts of bruxism. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(5):437-438.
Manfredini D, Winocur E, Guarda-Nardini L, Paesani D, Lobbezoo F. Epidemiology of bruxism in adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27(2):99-110.
Beddis H, Pemberton M, Davies S. Sleep bruxism: an overview for clinicians. Br Dent J. 2018;225(6):497-501.
Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(3):460-469.
Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism and dental implants: a meta-analysis. Implant Dent. 2015;24(5):505-516.
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.
NIH. Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies. 2014 https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed 15 January 2020
Tonetti MS, Schmid J. Pathogenesis of implant failures. Periodontol 2000. 2000;1994(4):127-138.
Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, et al. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology. 2008;70(18):1630-1635.
Egger M, Smith GD. Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. BMJ books; 2003:23-42.
Wallace BC, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Trow P, Schmid CH. Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational Back-end. J Stat Softw. 2012;49(5):1-15.
Wallace BC, Lajeunesse MJ, Dietz G, et al. OpenMEE: intuitive, open-source software for meta-analysis in ecology and evolutionary biology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2017;8(8):941-947.
Barnea E, Tal H, Nissan J, Tarrasch R, Peleg M, Kolerman R. The use of tilted implant for posterior atrophic maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(4):788-800.
Bischof M, Nedir R, Abi Najm S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Samson J. A five-year life-table analysis on wide neck ITI implants with prosthetic evaluation and radiographic analysis: results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(5):512-520.
Cakan U, Özcan M. Implant-supported extra-orally cemented monolithic zirconia crowns: a prospective controlled clinical study up to 18 months in function. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2022;30(4):276-283.
Clauser C, Sforza NM, Menini I, Kalemaj Z, Buti J. Immediate Postextraction single-tooth implants and provisional crowns in the esthetic area: 2-year results of a cohort prospective multicenter study-patient-centered outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(4):833-840.
Coltro MPL, Ozkomur A, Villarinho EA, Teixeira ER, Vigo A, Shinkai RSA. Risk factor model of mechanical complications in implant-supported fixed complete dentures: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(9):915-921.
Di Francesco F, De Marco G, Cristache CM, Vernal R, Cafferata EA, Lanza A. Survival and mechanical complications of posterior single implant-supported restorations using prefabricated titanium abutments: a medium- and long-term retrospective analysis with up to 10 years follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2022;35(3):278-286.
Engstrand P, Gröndahl K, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Nannmark U, Brånemark PI. Prospective follow-up study of 95 patients with edentulous mandibles treated according to the Branemark novum concept. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(1):3-10.
Gamper FB, Benic GI, Sanz-Martin I, Asgeirsson AG, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing one-piece and two-piece dental implants supporting fixed and removable dental prostheses: 4-to 6-year observations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(12):1553-1559.
Gjelvold B, Kisch J, Mohammed DJH, Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Immediate loading of single implants, guided surgery, and intraoral scanning: a nonrandomized study. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33(5):513-522.
Guncu MB, Aktas G, Guncu GN, Anıl D, Turkyilmaz I, Antonoff LR. Clinical, technical, and radiologic outcomes of 182 implant-supported zirconia single crowns using Titanium-Base abutments: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2022;35(4):553-559.
Han J, Tang Z, Zhang X, Meng H. A prospective, multi-center study assessing early loading with short implants in posterior regions. A 3-year post-loading follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(1):34-42.
Higuchi K, Rosenberg R, Davó R, Albanese M, Liddelow G. A prospective single-cohort multicenter study of an innovative prefabricated three-implant-supported full-arch prosthesis for treatment of edentulous mandible: 1-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(1):150-159.
Ibañez JC, Tahhan MJ, Zamar JA, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of double acid-etched surface titanium implants in 41 consecutive full-arch cases in the mandible and maxilla: 6-to 74-month results. J Periodontol. 2005;76(11):1972-1981.
Malo P, de Araujo NM, Lopes A, Ferro A, Botto J. The all-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: a longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(4):565-577.
Malo P, de Araujo NM, Lopes A, Ferro A, Nunes M. The all-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: a longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(4):538-549.
Malo P, Nobre M, Lopes A. Immediate loading of'All-on-4′ maxillary prostheses using trans-sinus tilted implants without sinus bone grafting: a retrospective study reporting the 3-year outcome. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6(3):273-283.
Mastrangelo F, Gastaldi G, Vinci R, et al. Immediate Postextractive implants with and without bone graft: 3-year follow-up results from a multicenter controlled randomized trial. Implant Dent. 2018;27(6):638-645.
Pera F, Menini M, Bagnasco F, Mussano F, Ambrogio G, Pesce P. Evaluation of internal and external hexagon connections in immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations: a within-person randomized split-mouth controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(4):562-567.
Schlee M, Pradies G, Mehmke WU, et al. Prospective, multicenter evaluation of trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants placed in routine dental practices: 1-year interim report from the development period (2010 to 2011). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1141-1153.
Schneider D, Witt L, Hämmerle CH. Influence of the crown-to-implant length ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting single crown restorations: a cross-sectional retrospective 5-year investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(2):169-174.
Segalla DB, Villarinho EA, Correia ARM, Vigo A, Shinkai RSA. A within-subject comparison of short implants in the posterior region: retrospective study of up to 10 years. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(3):172-179.
Stacchi C, Troiano G, Rapani A, et al. Factors influencing the prevalence of peri-implantitis in implants inserted in augmented maxillary sinuses: a multicenter cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2021;92(8):1117-1125.
Tealdo T, Menini M, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, Capalbo V, Pera P. Brånemark novum® immediate loading rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles: 11-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):83-89.
Villarinho EA, Triches DF, Alonso FR, Mezzomo LAM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RSA. Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: a prospective clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(4):671-680.
Vrielinck L, Blok J, Politis C. Survival of conventional dental implants in the edentulous atrophic maxilla in combination with zygomatic implants: a 20-year retrospective study. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):27.
Bredberg C, Vu C, Haggman-Henrikson B, Chrcanovic BR. Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non-bruxer patients: a retrospective case-control study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;25(1):124-132.
Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43(2):192-203.
Mishra SK, Chowdhary R, Chrcanovic BR, Brånemark PI. Osseoperception in dental implants: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(3):185-195.
Meyer G, Fanghanel J, Proff P. Morphofunctional aspects of dental implants. Ann Anat. 2012;194(2):190-194.
Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(5):528-535.
Lobbezoo F, Brouwers JE, Cune MS, Naeije M. Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(2):152-159.
Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(1):26-35.
Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:99-119.
Klokkevold PR, Han TJ. How do smoking, diabetes, and periodontitis affect outcomes of implant treatment? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):173-202.
Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Aarab G, et al. The development of the standardised tool for the assessment of bruxism (STAB): an international road map. J Oral Rehabil. 2022.