Dysphagia Outcomes Before and After Adenotonsillectomy in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery
ISSN: 2168-619X
Titre abrégé: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589542
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2023
01 Oct 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
17
08
2024
pubmed:
17
8
2023
medline:
17
8
2023
entrez:
17
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and tonsil hypertrophy may be associated with dysphagia. However, randomized clinical trials assessing dysphagia outcomes in children randomized to adenotonsillectomy (AT) vs watchful waiting with supportive care (WWSC) are lacking. To assess dysphagia outcomes in children with OSA and tonsil hypertrophy managed with AT or WWSC. This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial, the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (CHAT), was conducted at tertiary children's hospitals from October 2007 to June 2012. Children aged 5.0 to 9.9 years with OSA were randomized to AT or WWSC and underwent polysomnography at baseline and 7 months. Caregivers completed the OSA-18 questionnaire, which includes an item on difficulty in swallowing at baseline and 7 months. The current secondary analysis was conducted from December 1, 2022, to January 10, 2023. AT vs WWSC. Prevalence of dysphagia, based on parental responses to the difficulty in swallowing item on the OSA-18 questionnaire, was redefined as a binary outcome at baseline and 7-month follow-up. In total, 386 children were included (199 female [51.6%]; median [IQR] age, 6.0 [5.0-8.0] years). Of the total, 207 children were Black (53.6%). At baseline, the number of children with dysphagia was similar (4.0%; 95% CI, -4.9% to 12.9%) between the AT group (56 [29.8%]) and the WWSC group (51 [25.8%]). Following AT, a decrease was observed (21.3%; 95% CI, 13.5%-28.9%) in the prevalence of dysphagia among the children. In contrast, the prevalence of dysphagia did not change significantly (1.0%; 95% CI, -7.6% to 9.6%) in the WWSC group. Children in the AT group were more likely to experience a resolution of dysphagia than those in the WWSC group (adjusted odds ratio, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.91-12.25). Higher baseline AHI was associated with a lower resolution of dysphagia (AOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98). This secondary analysis of the CHAT randomized clinical trial suggested that children with dysphagia and OSA undergoing AT may experience dysphagia improvement. A prospective randomized trial that uses a validated dysphagia survey is needed to verify the effectiveness of AT in treating dysphagia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00560859.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37590002
pii: 2808659
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.2145
pmc: PMC10436182
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00560859']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
878-883Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn