Application and Use of Andersen's Behavioral Model as Theoretical Framework: A Systematic Literature Review from 2012-2021.
Andersen’s behavioral model
Health services utilization
Journal
Iranian journal of public health
ISSN: 2251-6093
Titre abrégé: Iran J Public Health
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 7505531
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
12
10
2022
accepted:
24
01
2023
medline:
18
8
2023
pubmed:
18
8
2023
entrez:
18
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anderson's model provides a theoretical structure to understand use of health service. This scoping review aimed to examine the application of Andersen's behavioral model in different studies. Related studies that were published between 2012 and 2021 were retrieved by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and CINAHL databases. Fourteen studies satisfied the criteria for inclusion. The reviewed studies specified that the Andersen's Model has been used in numerous parts of the health system and concerning different illnesses. The reviewed studies revealed differences in the factors examined. Most of the studies examined age, education, gender, marital status, and employment status as predisposing factors, and income, medical insurance, and living location as enabling factors. While, the chronic illnesses and perceived general health status were examined as need factors, in addition to an extensive diversity of health conditions and illnesses. Though the associations were established among the key factors tested in the reviewed studies and health care service use, the findings were inconsistent. In the reviewed studies, the setting and the study population characteristics looked to have a strong influence on the direction and strength of these associations. Merely a slight number of common factors were examined and there were enormous differences in the methods by which these factors were classified. Future and primary studies are necessary to deepen our understanding of the use of health care services and the complexity of the Andersen's behavioral model.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Anderson's model provides a theoretical structure to understand use of health service. This scoping review aimed to examine the application of Andersen's behavioral model in different studies.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Related studies that were published between 2012 and 2021 were retrieved by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and CINAHL databases. Fourteen studies satisfied the criteria for inclusion.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The reviewed studies specified that the Andersen's Model has been used in numerous parts of the health system and concerning different illnesses. The reviewed studies revealed differences in the factors examined. Most of the studies examined age, education, gender, marital status, and employment status as predisposing factors, and income, medical insurance, and living location as enabling factors. While, the chronic illnesses and perceived general health status were examined as need factors, in addition to an extensive diversity of health conditions and illnesses. Though the associations were established among the key factors tested in the reviewed studies and health care service use, the findings were inconsistent. In the reviewed studies, the setting and the study population characteristics looked to have a strong influence on the direction and strength of these associations.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Merely a slight number of common factors were examined and there were enormous differences in the methods by which these factors were classified. Future and primary studies are necessary to deepen our understanding of the use of health care services and the complexity of the Andersen's behavioral model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37593505
doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i7.13236
pii: IJPH-52-1346
pmc: PMC10430393
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1346-1354Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Alkhawaldeh et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Références
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Dec;49(12):2367-2375
pubmed: 34178743
Health Serv Res. 1974 Fall;9(3):208-20
pubmed: 4436074
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):95-124
pubmed: 4198894
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):647-53
pubmed: 18580382
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2014;2014:735235
pubmed: 25431589
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 May;39(3):200-9
pubmed: 21533848
Acta Oncol. 2013 Feb;52(2):382-90
pubmed: 23320775
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:170-176
pubmed: 27788380
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;63(2):103-114
pubmed: 29056085
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 17;15:271
pubmed: 26184765
J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10
pubmed: 7738325
Gerontology. 2012;58(4):366-70
pubmed: 22179496
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016 Feb;7(1):18-25
pubmed: 26981338
Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:Doc11
pubmed: 23133505
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208729
pubmed: 30521640
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jul;45(7):768-779
pubmed: 29681132
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Sep;52:100845
pubmed: 32205107