Homologous versus Heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 Vaccination in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a blinded randomized controlled trial.
RBD subunit vaccine
SARS-CoV-2
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
heterologous prime boost COVID-19 vaccination
immunogenicity
inactivated vaccines
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
10
06
2023
accepted:
13
07
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
18
8
2023
entrez:
18
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Optimizing vaccine efficacy is of particular concern in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which mainly have an inadequate immune response to primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This investigation aimed to explore the potential prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination strategies following autologous (auto-) HSCT. In a randomized clinical trial, patients who had already received two primary doses of receptor-binding domain (RBD) tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during three to nine months after auto-HSCT were randomized to receive either a homologous RBD-TT conjugated or heterologous inactivated booster dose four weeks after the primary vaccination course. The primary outcome was comparing the anti-S IgG Immune status ratio (ISR) four weeks after the heterologous versus homologous booster dose. The assessment of safety and reactogenicity adverse events was considered as the secondary outcome. Sixty-one auto-HSCT recipients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either homologous or heterologous booster doses four weeks after the primary vaccination course. The mean ISR was 3.40 (95% CI: 2.63- 4.16) before the booster dose with a 90.0% seropositive rate. The ISR raised to 5.12 (95% CI: 4.15- 6.08) with a 100% seropositive rate after heterologous (P= 0.0064) and to 3.42 (95% CI: 2.67- 4.17) with a 93.0% seropositivity after the homologous booster doses (P= 0.96). In addition, the heterologous group suffered more AEs following the booster dosage than the homologous group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.955). In multivariable analysis, the prime-boost vaccination strategy (heterologous versus homologous), the level of ISR before the booster dose, and the length of time between auto-HSCT and booster dose were the positive predictors of serologic response to a booster dose. No serious adverse event is attributed to booster vaccination. In patients who were primed with two SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses during the first year after auto-HSCT, heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination with inactivated platform resulted in considerably enhanced serologic response and non-significantly higher reactogenicity adverse events than homologous RBD-TT conjugated prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination strategy.
Sections du résumé
Background/Purpose
Optimizing vaccine efficacy is of particular concern in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which mainly have an inadequate immune response to primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This investigation aimed to explore the potential prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination strategies following autologous (auto-) HSCT.
Methods
In a randomized clinical trial, patients who had already received two primary doses of receptor-binding domain (RBD) tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during three to nine months after auto-HSCT were randomized to receive either a homologous RBD-TT conjugated or heterologous inactivated booster dose four weeks after the primary vaccination course. The primary outcome was comparing the anti-S IgG Immune status ratio (ISR) four weeks after the heterologous versus homologous booster dose. The assessment of safety and reactogenicity adverse events was considered as the secondary outcome.
Results
Sixty-one auto-HSCT recipients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either homologous or heterologous booster doses four weeks after the primary vaccination course. The mean ISR was 3.40 (95% CI: 2.63- 4.16) before the booster dose with a 90.0% seropositive rate. The ISR raised to 5.12 (95% CI: 4.15- 6.08) with a 100% seropositive rate after heterologous (P= 0.0064) and to 3.42 (95% CI: 2.67- 4.17) with a 93.0% seropositivity after the homologous booster doses (P= 0.96). In addition, the heterologous group suffered more AEs following the booster dosage than the homologous group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.955). In multivariable analysis, the prime-boost vaccination strategy (heterologous versus homologous), the level of ISR before the booster dose, and the length of time between auto-HSCT and booster dose were the positive predictors of serologic response to a booster dose. No serious adverse event is attributed to booster vaccination.
Conclusion
In patients who were primed with two SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses during the first year after auto-HSCT, heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination with inactivated platform resulted in considerably enhanced serologic response and non-significantly higher reactogenicity adverse events than homologous RBD-TT conjugated prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37593732
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1237916
pmc: PMC10427916
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Tetanus Toxoid
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1237916Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Sharifi Aliabadi, Karami, Barkhordar, Hashemi Nazari, Kavousi, Ahmadvand and Vaezi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276
pubmed: 34863358
Vaccine. 2022 Jul 29;40(31):4220-4230
pubmed: 35691871
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2093-2100
pubmed: 34756184
Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 19;14:1169666
pubmed: 37153556
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jun;10(6):e798-e806
pubmed: 35472300
J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Jun 16;15(1):81
pubmed: 35710431
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 10;14(2):
pubmed: 35053487
Br J Haematol. 2022 Feb;196(4):928-931
pubmed: 34664267
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 03;11(1):
pubmed: 36679963
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):165-171
pubmed: 34928302
Lancet Haematol. 2021 Mar;8(3):e185-e193
pubmed: 33482113
Am J Transplant. 2022 Sep;22(9):2254-2260
pubmed: 35429211
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;11(1):46
pubmed: 35974381
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;205(7):844-847
pubmed: 35015969
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):483-495
pubmed: 34890537
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):521-529
pubmed: 35074136
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 12;13(1):5362
pubmed: 36097029
Annu Rev Med. 2022 Jan 27;73:55-64
pubmed: 34637324
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 May 13;11(1):53
pubmed: 35562753
Blood Rev. 2022 Nov;56:100984
pubmed: 35752546
Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):856-869
pubmed: 34370971
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Feb;18:100423
pubmed: 36618081
Leukemia. 2021 Oct;35(10):2885-2894
pubmed: 34079042
J Clin Virol. 2023 Feb;159:105374
pubmed: 36592547
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Jan 24;:100141
pubmed: 36712811
Med. 2022 Nov 11;3(11):760-773.e5
pubmed: 35998623