Implantable Penile Prosthesis for Erectile Dysfunction: Insurance Coverage in the United States.


Journal

Urology practice
ISSN: 2352-0787
Titre abrégé: Urol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635343

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2023
Historique:
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 18 8 2023
entrez: 18 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A manufacturer's benefit verification database was evaluated to ascertain United States health plan insurance coverage for implantable penile prostheses for erectile dysfunction. All-payer and employer-sponsored health plan benefit verification databases were queried to determine implantable penile prosthesis approval status. For the all-payer analysis, data by payer were available and presented for 2019-2021 to assess approval status varied by payer and over time. For the employer-sponsored health plan analysis, data by payer were available from 2018-2021. Benefit verification records for the all-payer database were available for 3,167 patients in 2019, 3,016 in 2020, and 2,837 in 2021. Insurance type was preferred provider organization (27.5%), Medicare Advantage (26.9%), Medicare (15.9%), or point-of-service (10.5%). Most patients were approved or verified for implantable penile prosthesis coverage (79.4% in 2019, 79.6% in 2020, and 78.4% in 2021). Coverage was most extensive for government-based insurance (Medicare 98.7%, Medicare Advantage 97.1%, Tricare 100%, and Veterans Affairs 80.0%) but was also favorable for commercial insurance (75.0%). The most common reason for lack of coverage was employer exclusion; the proportion of patients with no coverage due to exclusion increased from 13.5% in 2019 to 17.5% in 2021. Analyses of the employer-sponsored health plan database (n=3,083 patients) showed that 63.1% of patients were approved or verified for coverage and 34.2% did not have coverage due to health plan exclusions. Approximately 80% of patients had implantable penile prosthesis coverage. Employer exclusion was the most common reason for lagging coverage; rates of employer exclusion increased 29.3% from 2019-2021.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37594033
doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000416
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

501-510

Auteurs

Mohit Khera (M)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Joshua P Langston (JP)

Urology of Virginia/Eastern Virginia Medical School, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Matthew E Pollard (ME)

Posterity Fertility, PC, Denver, Colorado.

Denise Asafu-Adjei (D)

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.

Natalie C Edwards (NC)

Health Services Consulting Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts.

Krista D Nitschelm (KD)

Health Economics & Market Access, Pelvic Floor & Prosthetic Urology, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.

Mital Patel (M)

Global Value & Outcomes, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.

Samir K Bhattacharyya (SK)

Health Economics & Market Access, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH