Protein components of maple syrup as a potential resource for the development of novel anti‑colorectal cancer drugs.

AGE EMT STAT3 autophagy colorectal cancer maple syrup receptor for AGE

Journal

Oncology reports
ISSN: 1791-2431
Titre abrégé: Oncol Rep
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 9422756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 03 03 2023
accepted: 31 07 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 18 8 2023
entrez: 18 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Maple syrup is a natural sweetener consumed worldwide. Active ingredients of maple syrup possess antitumor effects; however, these ingredients are phenolic compounds. The present study aimed to investigate components other than phenolic compounds that may have antitumor effects against colorectal cancer (CRC). Cell proliferation assays demonstrated that treatment with the more than 10,000 molecular weight fraction significantly inhibited viability in DLD‑1 cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that the protein components of maple syrup may be the active ingredients in maple syrup. We obtained protein components from maple syrup by ammonium sulfate precipitation, and treatment with the protein fraction of maple syrup (MSpf) was found to exhibit a potential antitumor effect. MSpf‑treated DLD‑1 colon adenocarcinoma cells exhibited significantly decreased proliferation, migration and invasion. In addition, upregulation of LC3A and E‑cadherin and downregulation of MMP‑9 expression levels were observed following MSpf treatment. Investigation of the components of MSpf suggested that it was primarily formed of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Therefore, whether AGEs in MSpf affected the STAT3 pathway through the binding to its receptor, receptor of AGE (RAGE), was assessed. MSpf treatment was associated with decreased RAGE expression and STAT3 phosphorylation. Finally, to determine whether autophagy contributed to the inhibitory effect of cell proliferation following MSpf treatment, the effect of MSpf treatment on autophagy induction following bafilomycin A1 treatment, a specific autophagy inhibitor, was assessed. The inhibitory effect of MSpf treatment on cell proliferation was enhanced through the inhibition of autophagy by bafilomycin A1 treatment. These results suggested that AGEs in MSpf suppressed cell proliferation and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition through inhibition of the STAT3 signaling pathway through decreased RAGE expression. Therefore, AGEs in MSpf may be potential compounds for the development of antitumor drugs for the treatment of CRC with fewer adverse effects compared with existing antitumor drugs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37594118
doi: 10.3892/or.2023.8616
pii: 179
pmc: PMC10463007
doi:
pii:

Substances chimiques

bafilomycin A1 88899-55-2
Glycation End Products, Advanced 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Molecules. 2021 Nov 08;26(21):
pubmed: 34771150
Oncol Lett. 2019 Mar;17(3):2713-2720
pubmed: 30854045
J Cell Mol Med. 2022 Nov;26(21):5539-5550
pubmed: 36251949
Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009;56:101-43
pubmed: 19389608
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Dec 09;17(12):
pubmed: 27941683
Redox Biol. 2022 Oct 10;57:102505
pubmed: 36279629
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Jun;128:240-255
pubmed: 30991130
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):7031-6
pubmed: 22509024
Biol Pharm Bull. 2022;45(10):1466-1475
pubmed: 36184504
Phytomedicine. 2023 Jan;108:154526
pubmed: 36334389
EMBO J. 2015 Apr 1;34(7):856-80
pubmed: 25712477
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Sep 15;14(9):6187-6195
pubmed: 36247299
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2023 Apr 21;28(1):33
pubmed: 37085753
J Med Food. 2010 Apr;13(2):460-8
pubmed: 20132041
Matrix Biol. 2015 May-Jul;44-46:200-6
pubmed: 25652204
Annu Rev Pathol. 2018 Jan 24;13:395-412
pubmed: 29414248
Drug Dev Res. 2022 Apr;83(2):389-396
pubmed: 34402084
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33
pubmed: 35020204
Foods. 2022 Jul 25;11(15):
pubmed: 35892796
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30
pubmed: 29313949
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2022 Jun;60(2):266-278
pubmed: 35910270
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 04;9(8):
pubmed: 28777346
Cell Tissue Res. 2022 Oct;390(1):113-129
pubmed: 35794391
Phytother Res. 2012 Jul;26(7):995-1002
pubmed: 22147441
Redox Biol. 2017 Oct;13:508-521
pubmed: 28734243
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 04;23(21):
pubmed: 36362294
Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Sep 1;63(4):582-92
pubmed: 15306213
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Aug;9(16):1304
pubmed: 34532441
J Inflamm Res. 2021 Dec 22;14:7281-7293
pubmed: 34992417
J Oleo Sci. 2015;64(3):331-5
pubmed: 25757438
J Clin Invest. 2009 Jun;119(6):1429-37
pubmed: 19487819
Food Res Int. 2017 Sep;99(Pt 3):1048-1055
pubmed: 28865616
Foods. 2021 Dec 20;10(12):
pubmed: 34945711
J Cell Sci. 2008 Mar 15;121(Pt 6):727-35
pubmed: 18322269
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 14;13:922477
pubmed: 36188592
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 21;19(20):
pubmed: 36294262
Biomed Rep. 2017 Jul;7(1):6-10
pubmed: 28685052
Planta Med. 2018 Jul;84(9-10):627-637
pubmed: 29518815
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Jul 16;62(28):6687-98
pubmed: 24983789
Food Funct. 2021 Oct 19;12(20):9658-9668
pubmed: 34664597
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;8(4):319-333
pubmed: 36157259
Phytomedicine. 2016 Apr 15;23(4):398-405
pubmed: 27002410
Free Radic Res. 2013 Aug;47 Suppl 1:3-27
pubmed: 23767955
Food Chem. 2013 Jan 15;136(2):636-42
pubmed: 23122108
J Food Sci. 2019 Jun;84(6):1538-1546
pubmed: 31120572
J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2021 Nov 23;28(1):22
pubmed: 34814951
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 16;12:1023177
pubmed: 36591515
Cancer Cell. 2014 Jul 14;26(1):106-20
pubmed: 25026213
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Jan;57(1):5-14
pubmed: 26632377
Cell Cycle. 2011 Dec 15;10(24):4256-71
pubmed: 22134354
Pathol Res Pract. 2023 May;245:154425
pubmed: 37019018
Matrix Biol. 2021 Jan;95:1-14
pubmed: 33065248
J Biol Chem. 2012 Dec 28;287(53):44498-507
pubmed: 23150674
Glycoconj J. 2016 Aug;33(4):499-512
pubmed: 27291759
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Nov 20;18(11):
pubmed: 29156655
Oncol Rep. 2015 Apr;33(4):1579-84
pubmed: 25647359
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 11;20(20):
pubmed: 31614552
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 08;23(19):
pubmed: 36233242
Cells. 2022 Apr 12;11(8):
pubmed: 35455991

Auteurs

Tetsushi Yamamoto (T)

Pathological and Biomolecule Analyses Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Higashi-osaka 577‑8502, Japan.

Ryota Shiburo (R)

Pathological and Biomolecule Analyses Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Higashi-osaka 577‑8502, Japan.

Yoshie Moriyama (Y)

Pathological and Biomolecule Analyses Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Higashi-osaka 577‑8502, Japan.

Kuniko Mitamura (K)

Pathological and Biomolecule Analyses Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Higashi-osaka 577‑8502, Japan.

Atsushi Taga (A)

Pathological and Biomolecule Analyses Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Higashi-osaka 577‑8502, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH