Qualitative study of in-kind incentives to improve healthcare quality in Belize: Is quality work better than wealth?
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
18
11
2022
accepted:
09
08
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
18
8
2023
entrez:
18
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a sparsity of knowledge of the specific mechanisms through which financial and non-financial incentives impact the performance of health teams. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by examining an in-kind incentives program for healthcare teams implemented in three districts in Belize (2012-2022) as part of the Salud Mesoamerica Initiative, which aimed to improve healthcare quality. We performed a qualitative study to understand the mechanisms through which the in-kind incentive program supported quality improvement in Belize. We conducted key informant interviews (April-June 2021) remotely on a sample of former and current healthcare workers from Belize's Ministry of Health and Wellness familiar with the program. We analyzed responses using qualitative content analysis. We used open coding to identify patterns and themes. We conducted eight key informant interviews from a pool of thirty potential informants. Our analysis of the interviews yielded a total of 11 major themes with 27 subthemes. Most informants reported that in-kind incentives were not the primary motivation for improving their performance, though they did acknowledge that incentives had increased their attention on the quality of care provided. Conversely, we found that quarterly measurements and supportive supervision by national level authorities offered an external validation mechanism and instilled frontline staff with a sense of shared responsibility towards improving their performance. The majority of informants conveyed positive opinions about the in-kind incentives program. Our study contributes to the understanding of how in-kind incentives can enhance performance. We found that in-kind incentives created extrinsic motivation, leading to an increased focus on quality. Standardized measurements and supportive supervision improved intrinsic motivation and formed a stronger commitment to quality of care. Rather than focusing on tangible incentives, explicitly incorporating standardized measurements and supportive supervision in the routine work of the Ministry of Health could have longer lasting effects on quality improvement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is a sparsity of knowledge of the specific mechanisms through which financial and non-financial incentives impact the performance of health teams. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by examining an in-kind incentives program for healthcare teams implemented in three districts in Belize (2012-2022) as part of the Salud Mesoamerica Initiative, which aimed to improve healthcare quality.
METHODS
We performed a qualitative study to understand the mechanisms through which the in-kind incentive program supported quality improvement in Belize. We conducted key informant interviews (April-June 2021) remotely on a sample of former and current healthcare workers from Belize's Ministry of Health and Wellness familiar with the program. We analyzed responses using qualitative content analysis. We used open coding to identify patterns and themes.
RESULTS
We conducted eight key informant interviews from a pool of thirty potential informants. Our analysis of the interviews yielded a total of 11 major themes with 27 subthemes. Most informants reported that in-kind incentives were not the primary motivation for improving their performance, though they did acknowledge that incentives had increased their attention on the quality of care provided. Conversely, we found that quarterly measurements and supportive supervision by national level authorities offered an external validation mechanism and instilled frontline staff with a sense of shared responsibility towards improving their performance. The majority of informants conveyed positive opinions about the in-kind incentives program.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study contributes to the understanding of how in-kind incentives can enhance performance. We found that in-kind incentives created extrinsic motivation, leading to an increased focus on quality. Standardized measurements and supportive supervision improved intrinsic motivation and formed a stronger commitment to quality of care. Rather than focusing on tangible incentives, explicitly incorporating standardized measurements and supportive supervision in the routine work of the Ministry of Health could have longer lasting effects on quality improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37594970
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290457
pii: PONE-D-22-31837
pmc: PMC10437859
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0290457Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Rios-Zertuche et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
BMJ. 2011 Jun 28;342:d3590
pubmed: 21712336
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Apr 1;31(3):183-190
pubmed: 29917087
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;5:CD007899
pubmed: 33951190
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212
pubmed: 30195398
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):237-43
pubmed: 20543209
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2016 Dec;14(4):175-182
pubmed: 27552534
Glob Health Action. 2016 Oct 13;9:32404
pubmed: 27741956
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):137-153
pubmed: 29126109
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Jul;29(4):456-65
pubmed: 23735736
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;169:1-8
pubmed: 27665198
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:346-351
pubmed: 28186066
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1420
pubmed: 32765341
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 7;16(1):120
pubmed: 28687089
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jan 13;3(1):e000664
pubmed: 29564163
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;132(1):117-25
pubmed: 26653397