The psychophysics of bouncing: Perceptual constraints, physical constraints, animacy, and phenomenal causality.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 12 2022
accepted: 23 04 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 18 8 2023
entrez: 18 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the present study we broadly explored the perception of physical and animated motion in bouncing-like scenarios through four experiments. In the first experiment, participants were asked to categorize bouncing-like displays as physical bounce, animated motion, or other. Several parameters of the animations were manipulated, that is, the simulated coefficient of restitution, the value of simulated gravitational acceleration, the motion pattern (uniform acceleration/deceleration or constant speed) and the number of bouncing cycles. In the second experiment, a variable delay at the moment of the collision between the bouncing object and the bouncing surface was introduced. Main results show that, although observers appear to have realistic representations of physical constraints like energy conservation and gravitational acceleration/deceleration, the amount of visual information available in the scene has a strong modulation effect on the extent to which they rely on these representations. A coefficient of restitution >1 was a crucial cue to animacy in displays showing three bouncing cycles, but not in displays showing one bouncing cycle. Additionally, bouncing impressions appear to be driven by perceptual constraints that are unrelated to the physical realism of the scene, like preference for simulated gravitational attraction smaller than g and perceived temporal contiguity between the different phases of bouncing. In the third experiment, the visible opaque bouncing surface was removed from the scene, and the results showed that this did not have any substantial effect on the resulting impressions of physical bounce or animated motion, suggesting that the visual system can fill-in the scene with the missing element. The fourth experiment explored visual impressions of causality in bouncing scenarios. At odds with claims of current causal perception theories, results indicate that a passive object can be perceived as the direct cause of the motion behavior of an active object.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37594993
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285448
pii: PONE-D-22-33138
pmc: PMC10437946
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0285448

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Vicovaro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:87-92
pubmed: 28292667
Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):799-808
pubmed: 33792421
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Feb;78(2):618-35
pubmed: 26659806
Cortex. 2017 Oct;95:172-191
pubmed: 28910670
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1445-1471
pubmed: 34591519
Perception. 2000;29(8):943-51
pubmed: 11145086
Iperception. 2020 Dec 26;11(6):2041669520980019
pubmed: 33489073
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446
pubmed: 19884961
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;25(6):475-492
pubmed: 33812770
Psychol Sci. 2022 Feb;33(2):224-235
pubmed: 34982590
J Vis. 2013 Mar 22;13(4):15
pubmed: 23525131
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Aug;68(6):1047-58
pubmed: 17153197
Perception. 2004;33(4):455-69
pubmed: 15222393
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Dec;21(6):1473-93
pubmed: 7490589
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):1-2
pubmed: 29345483
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Sep;59(2):154-79
pubmed: 19500784
J Vis. 2020 Jun 3;20(6):6
pubmed: 32516356
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):693-4
pubmed: 11426224
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Sep-Oct;123(1-2):1-19
pubmed: 16860283
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Aug;64(6):956-68
pubmed: 12269302
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2015-2033
pubmed: 35705791
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e229
pubmed: 26189677
Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):575-82
pubmed: 23474831
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):44-8
pubmed: 20424021
Dev Sci. 2017 Jul;20(4):
pubmed: 26898995
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:133-144
pubmed: 29724404
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 17;8:1841
pubmed: 29089917
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Mar;194:51-62
pubmed: 30743090
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;113(1):132-47
pubmed: 16478304
Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;120(2):411-37
pubmed: 23458084
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1649-1662
pubmed: 28956971
Perception. 1987;16(3):309-36
pubmed: 3432028
Am J Psychol. 1997 Winter;110(4):573-602
pubmed: 9479748
Perception. 2010;39(9):1240-53
pubmed: 21125951
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):652-664
pubmed: 28337549
Science. 1989 Jan 20;243(4889):365-7
pubmed: 2911746
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):647-52
pubmed: 17972727
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Oct;58(7):1066-75
pubmed: 8920842
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Sep-Oct;123(1-2):166-85
pubmed: 16919228
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jul;116(3):580-601
pubmed: 19618988
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Aug;66(6):926-42
pubmed: 15675641
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Sep;21(9):649-665
pubmed: 28655498
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;21(10):749-759
pubmed: 28711322
Psychol Bull. 2009 Sep;135(5):774-93
pubmed: 19702382
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):553-563
pubmed: 29181761
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Sep-Oct;123(1-2):112-43
pubmed: 16908002
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Aug;4(8):299-309
pubmed: 10904254
Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):493-8
pubmed: 12430831
Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):1-10
pubmed: 20121858
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):591-596
pubmed: 27473683
Perception. 2011;40(1):74-90
pubmed: 21513186
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18327-32
pubmed: 24145417

Auteurs

Michele Vicovaro (M)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Loris Brunello (L)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Giulia Parovel (G)

Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH