Advancing the PD-L1 CPS test in metastatic TNBC: Insights from pathologists and findings from a nationwide survey.
22C3
Biomarkers
Breast cancer
CPS
Immunotherapy
PD-L1
SP263
TNBC
Journal
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
ISSN: 1879-0461
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8916049
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
21
05
2023
revised:
11
08
2023
accepted:
12
08
2023
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
19
8
2023
entrez:
18
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pembrolizumab has received approval as a first-line treatment for unresectable/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥ 10. However, assessing CPS in mTNBC poses challenges. Firstly, it represents a novel analysis for breast pathologists. Secondly, the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in mTNBC further complicates the assessment. Lastly, the lack of standardized assays and staining platforms adds to the complexity. In KEYNOTE trials, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit as a companion diagnostic test. However, both the 22C3 pharmDx and VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assays are validated for CPS assessment. Consequently, assay-platform choice, staining conditions, and scoring methods can significantly impact the testing outcomes. This consensus paper aims to discuss the intricacies of PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC and provide practical recommendations for pathologists. Additionally, we present findings from a nationwide Italian survey elucidating the state-of-the-art in PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37595344
pii: S1040-8428(23)00191-9
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104103
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104103Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Nicola Fusco has received honoraria for consulting, advisory role, speaker bureau, travel, and/or research grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Gilead, Diaceutics, Adicet Bio, and Sermonix. Mariia Ivanova from Agilent Technologies Denmark ApS. Carmen Criscitiello reports personal fees for consulting, advisory role, and speakers’ bureau from Lilly, Roche, Novartis, MSD, Seagen, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. Bruna Cerbelli from MSD and Novartis. Fabio Pagni from MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Amgen. Mauro Mastropasqua from Exact Sciences. Alfredo Santinelli from Roche-Ventana, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Amgen. Giuseppe Curigliano has received honoraria for speaker’s engagement: Roche, Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Foundation Medicine, NanoString, Samsung, Celltrion, BMS, MSD; Honoraria for providing consultancy: Roche, Seattle Genetics, NanoString; Honoraria for participating in Advisory Board: Roche, Lilly, Pfizer, Foundation Medicine, Samsung, Celltrion, Mylan; Honoraria for writing engagement: Novartis, BMS; Honoraria for participation in Ellipsis Scientific Affairs Group; Institutional research funding for conducting phase I and II clinical trials: Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, Celgene, Servier, Orion, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, AbbVie, Tesaro, BMS, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp Dome, Janssen-Cilag, Philogen, Bayer, Medivation, Medimmune. Elena Guerini-Rocco from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Biocartis, Exact Science, GSK, and Illumina. Paolo Graziano Consulting/Honoraria from Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Amgen. Giulia d’Amati from MSD, Roche, Astrazeneca, Daiichi Sankyo. These companies had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and/or in the decision to publish the results. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.