Segment anything model for medical image analysis: An experimental study.


Journal

Medical image analysis
ISSN: 1361-8423
Titre abrégé: Med Image Anal
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9713490

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2023
Historique:
received: 14 05 2023
revised: 03 07 2023
accepted: 31 07 2023
pmc-release: 01 10 2024
medline: 8 9 2023
pubmed: 19 8 2023
entrez: 18 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Training segmentation models for medical images continues to be challenging due to the limited availability of data annotations. Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a foundation model trained on over 1 billion annotations, predominantly for natural images, that is intended to segment user-defined objects of interest in an interactive manner. While the model performance on natural images is impressive, medical image domains pose their own set of challenges. Here, we perform an extensive evaluation of SAM's ability to segment medical images on a collection of 19 medical imaging datasets from various modalities and anatomies. In our experiments, we generated point and box prompts for SAM using a standard method that simulates interactive segmentation. We report the following findings: (1) SAM's performance based on single prompts highly varies depending on the dataset and the task, from IoU=0.1135 for spine MRI to IoU=0.8650 for hip X-ray. (2) Segmentation performance appears to be better for well-circumscribed objects with prompts with less ambiguity such as the segmentation of organs in computed tomography and poorer in various other scenarios such as the segmentation of brain tumors. (3) SAM performs notably better with box prompts than with point prompts. (4) SAM outperforms similar methods RITM, SimpleClick, and FocalClick in almost all single-point prompt settings. (5) When multiple-point prompts are provided iteratively, SAM's performance generally improves only slightly while other methods' performance improves to the level that surpasses SAM's point-based performance. We also provide several illustrations for SAM's performance on all tested datasets, iterative segmentation, and SAM's behavior given prompt ambiguity. We conclude that SAM shows impressive zero-shot segmentation performance for certain medical imaging datasets, but moderate to poor performance for others. SAM has the potential to make a significant impact in automated medical image segmentation in medical imaging, but appropriate care needs to be applied when using it. Code for evaluation SAM is made publicly available at https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/segment-anything-medical-evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37595404
pii: S1361-8415(23)00178-0
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102918
pmc: PMC10528428
mid: NIHMS1927264
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

S-Adenosylmethionine 7LP2MPO46S

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102918

Subventions

Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB031575
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R44 HL152825
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Sci Data. 2022 Oct 4;9(1):601
pubmed: 36195599
Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:312-329
pubmed: 28286318
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021 Oct;43(10):3349-3364
pubmed: 32248092
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37
pubmed: 11701515
Data Brief. 2019 Nov 21;28:104863
pubmed: 31867417
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Aug;32(4):582-596
pubmed: 31144149
Ultrasonics. 2022 May;122:106706
pubmed: 35149255
Med Image Anal. 2023 Feb;84:102680
pubmed: 36481607
Comput Biol Med. 2015 May;60:8-31
pubmed: 25747341
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104623
pubmed: 34252683
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024
pubmed: 25494501
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 8;42(11):226
pubmed: 30298337
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2014 Dec;4(6):475-7
pubmed: 25525580
Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug;119(4):508-516
pubmed: 30033447

Auteurs

Maciej A Mazurowski (MA)

Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA; Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA; Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Haoyu Dong (H)

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. Electronic address: haoyu.dong151@duke.edu.

Hanxue Gu (H)

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Jichen Yang (J)

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Nicholas Konz (N)

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Yixin Zhang (Y)

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH