Segment anything model for medical image analysis: An experimental study.
Deep learning
Foundation models
Segmentation
Journal
Medical image analysis
ISSN: 1361-8423
Titre abrégé: Med Image Anal
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9713490
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
14
05
2023
revised:
03
07
2023
accepted:
31
07
2023
pmc-release:
01
10
2024
medline:
8
9
2023
pubmed:
19
8
2023
entrez:
18
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Training segmentation models for medical images continues to be challenging due to the limited availability of data annotations. Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a foundation model trained on over 1 billion annotations, predominantly for natural images, that is intended to segment user-defined objects of interest in an interactive manner. While the model performance on natural images is impressive, medical image domains pose their own set of challenges. Here, we perform an extensive evaluation of SAM's ability to segment medical images on a collection of 19 medical imaging datasets from various modalities and anatomies. In our experiments, we generated point and box prompts for SAM using a standard method that simulates interactive segmentation. We report the following findings: (1) SAM's performance based on single prompts highly varies depending on the dataset and the task, from IoU=0.1135 for spine MRI to IoU=0.8650 for hip X-ray. (2) Segmentation performance appears to be better for well-circumscribed objects with prompts with less ambiguity such as the segmentation of organs in computed tomography and poorer in various other scenarios such as the segmentation of brain tumors. (3) SAM performs notably better with box prompts than with point prompts. (4) SAM outperforms similar methods RITM, SimpleClick, and FocalClick in almost all single-point prompt settings. (5) When multiple-point prompts are provided iteratively, SAM's performance generally improves only slightly while other methods' performance improves to the level that surpasses SAM's point-based performance. We also provide several illustrations for SAM's performance on all tested datasets, iterative segmentation, and SAM's behavior given prompt ambiguity. We conclude that SAM shows impressive zero-shot segmentation performance for certain medical imaging datasets, but moderate to poor performance for others. SAM has the potential to make a significant impact in automated medical image segmentation in medical imaging, but appropriate care needs to be applied when using it. Code for evaluation SAM is made publicly available at https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/segment-anything-medical-evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37595404
pii: S1361-8415(23)00178-0
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102918
pmc: PMC10528428
mid: NIHMS1927264
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
S-Adenosylmethionine
7LP2MPO46S
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102918Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB031575
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R44 HL152825
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Sci Data. 2022 Oct 4;9(1):601
pubmed: 36195599
Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:312-329
pubmed: 28286318
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021 Oct;43(10):3349-3364
pubmed: 32248092
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37
pubmed: 11701515
Data Brief. 2019 Nov 21;28:104863
pubmed: 31867417
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Aug;32(4):582-596
pubmed: 31144149
Ultrasonics. 2022 May;122:106706
pubmed: 35149255
Med Image Anal. 2023 Feb;84:102680
pubmed: 36481607
Comput Biol Med. 2015 May;60:8-31
pubmed: 25747341
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104623
pubmed: 34252683
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024
pubmed: 25494501
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 8;42(11):226
pubmed: 30298337
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2014 Dec;4(6):475-7
pubmed: 25525580
Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug;119(4):508-516
pubmed: 30033447